Reply With Quote
Oh and let me know when Rush told his listeners to vote for Obama as a strategy for disrupting the primaries.
I'm sure you can tell me when it was.
To tell you the truth I gained a tremendous amount respect for the person that Chump is after meeting him...it's been hard for me to argue with him since then...thing is I've tried and he's a been a pussy about it himself...good to see him back in all his Chumpness...
Oh and let me know when Rush told his listeners to vote for Obama as a strategy for disrupting the primaries.
I'm sure you can tell me when it was.
As long as you understand the point behind the article....the headline and the body of the article was just an example.
Besides...I guarnatee you I can find and example of the Russians flying over Alaskan airspace at some point, which would render even the anal interpretation of the statement true.
You don't have to worry about that...Brilliant.
Don't let me stop you.
Eh if it wasn't Rush it was Hannity, already said it one of them was doing it...I get them confused, and I don't listen to either of them enough to know the exact dates. It was during the primaries.
Please do that -- and let me know what Palin's responsibilities were in that situation.
I know that your heart will go on.You don't have to worry about that...
Prejudice is prejudice...a name is no different then a policy especially since policies at this state are just words.
People are prejudiced against Republicans or Democrats, old people or young people...
There's no such thing as prejudice or racism in a Presidential Election...racism would have been not allowing him to run...
American citizens have a right to disciminate over anything, in their voting preferences. Anything...it is their right as American citizens to cast their vote or not for anyone they choose...anything and everything is fair game from bias to favor in an election. Looks, name, skin color, age, youth, voice inflection, intellience, gender, back ground, state of origin, region of origin, accent, their past, their education, politics, affiliations, associations, party affiliation, hair color, eye color, size...name....religious beliefs. Etc.
Anything.
It's all prejudice...and totally acceptable, since becoming President is not a right...but a privilege.
why do you think Dukakis got his ass kicked so bad?
...no one wanted to elect some dude whose name sounded so much like a turd...would have been a national disgrace.
Hold on one second...I need to go take a Dukakis.
It's already been gone over..go read the thread again. You are being stupid now...it was well explained in that thread.
She's briefed after it's over?
That's it?
No dude...but under certain cir stance she would be the one in command and of course they go over that...that is such an essential state to our National defense...hint, it's right next to Russia.
The what else happens?
Which cir stances?but under certain cir stance she would be the one in command and of course they go over that...that is such an essential state to our National defense...hint, it's right next to Russia.
It's in the thread.
Its actually not. You lose track of threads like you lose track of airspace.
Prejudice is prejudice...a name is no different then a policy especially since policies at this state are just words.
People are prejudiced against Republicans or Democrats, old people or young people...
There's no such thing as prejudice or racism in a Presidential Election...racism would have been not allowing him to run...
American citizens have a right to disciminate over anything, in their voting preferences. Anything...it is their right as American citizens to cast their vote or not for anyone they choose...anything and everything is fair game from bias to favor in an election. Looks, name, skin color, age, youth, voice inflection, intellience, gender, back ground, state of origin, region of origin, accent, their past, their education, politics, affiliations, associations, party affiliation, hair color, eye color, size...name....religious beliefs. Etc.
Anything.
It's all prejudice...and totally acceptable, since becoming President is not a right...but a privilege.
Hold on one second...I need to go take a Dukakis.
I always thought it was because he was so freakin short to be totally honest with you.
Out if those four you mentioned which ones are the most critical for Obama to carry in your opinion? Probably PA and CO I'm thinking. I just read on Taggert political wire that every one of McCain's ad's are now going negative. Now the is going to hit the fan. I'm just glad that Obama has these pretty sizable leads now. Another thing too is the Obama campaign is staying on the offensive as well. Man the 4th can get here quick enough.
I'm not worried about McCain going negative. Dem 527s have a lot of bullets to fire too, and if McCain wants to take his gloves off completely so be it. Its just another sign of desperation.
As for which of those states McCain needs to win, I love my answer because it explains just how dire it is for McCain.
Which does he need to win? All of them.
North Carolina voter registration trend [voters per week]:
8/30/2008 7,834
9/6/2008 10,077
9/13/2008 16,154
9/20/2008 20,880
9/27/2008 27,237
10/4/2008 31,114
This week:
Dem 16,067
Ind. 8,844
GOP 5,978
Lib 225
Total 31,114
Black voters were 34% of registrations this week. They make up 22% of all registered voters.
Overall in 2008:
+223,964 dem, +157,137 ind, +39,505 rep
Time for a thread reboot.
I'm curious as to what states people view as the real battlegrounds today? I've got my idea but I'm wonder what others view as the true toss ups right now.
Florida, North Carolina, Virginia and Ohio.
Any blue state where Obama faired poorly in the Primaries. I know you guys think people will blindly just transfer their enthusiasm to a candidate they didn't support...but it doesnt' work that way. Even if they don't change parties, even if their second choice isn't from a different party(as it usually is) they won't have the same motivation to go out and vote for a candidate they didn't support the first time around.
This is a problem for McCain as well...but it's the #1 area where Palin is helping...and it's the #1 area where Biden isn't helping Obama.
BTW, I do think Michigan is still in play
Last edited by whottt; 10-04-2008 at 03:24 PM.
The internals of that poll are wacky. That poll is an outlier. Minnesota is not going red. They were the only state that resisted Reagan in 84. McCain has spent a lot of money to be compe ive in Minnesota. His money would've been better spent shoring up Florida.Dammit how is he behind now in Minnesota....
Sorry I want a landslide....
You still think New York is a battleground state? Are you really that stupid?
Look at my sig...he says McCain will get more votes than Bush in 2004, and Obama will receive less than Kerry. If McCain wins, it's by the skin of his teeth.
With a steady 5-7 point lead in the polls, at certain point the RNC will shift money to congressional races.
The GOP should write off the presidential race and try to avoid a 60 seat Democratic Senate.
Congressional approval rating:
Code:RCP Average 09/19 - 09/30 17.8 75.6 -57.8 CBS News 09/27 - 09/30 18 77 -59 GW/Battleground 09/21 - 09/25 17 77 -60 FOX News 09/22 - 09/23 17 73 -56 NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 09/19 - 09/22 15 73 -58 CNN/OpinionResearch 09/19 - 09/21 22 78 -56
Those registrations by party ID don't mean near as much as you guys think they do.
Sin,
Whottt, a registered Democrat.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
