This isn't a topic that comes up here until around February but looking ahead -- waaaay ahead -- I'd be inclined to say that 1st seed is almost critical for the Spurs this year.
I wouldn't go so far as to say the Spurs' low seeding last year was the reason they did not repeat. It would, however, be foolish to say that the Spurs did themselves any favors with their playoff mathcups. Though Pop and Co. would never say it, beating the *akers would have been difficult under any cir stances but after the NO series was probably too tall a task.
So the Spurs got "younger?" Somewhat but 3/4 of "the core" still has old legs.
Artest is now in the division. Barry will thrive in houston like he didn't in SA.
Th *uns will either still be tough reg season opponent and will have a quality WL at the end or they will implode and finish at .500. I tend to trust the former rather than the latter.
Then there's Utah, who don't lose at home.
To me, all of this boils down to the importance of the reg season record. Pop historically pays no heed to seeding, at least publicly. This year I hope he plays FTW in the reg season as well as the POs. He can do this w/out over-playing his older stars. He's the best in the universe at managing minutes.