Reply With Quote
Another preseason, another article of how Iverson might go to the Spurs......
You can't And AI is a ballhogger and needs to have ball in his hands to feel the rythym and be effective. If you can call it effective what he is doing on offense.
Another preseason, another article of how Iverson might go to the Spurs......
Worst experiment ever if it's done!!!! He will take like 30 shots per game to score at least 10 points.....
The FO of the Spurs has a great plan in place: lots of available cap space in 2010, the opportunity to get one or two very good players to complement a still-young Tony Parker, the chance to win more championships in the last playing years of Tim & Manu while building a team that will be very good even after they retire, etc., etc... why jeopodize that plan by going after an aging undersized guy with a questionable at ude?
Besides, they've got George Hill...
I think Iverson's ego might be too big to ever be a role player on this team....or accept what the Spurs would likely offer in compensation. I could be wrong.
Not that I support getting Iverson at all, but the reason is because the Spurs will likely end up with another Rasho Nesterovic signing with all that cap space in 2010.
The cap space all depends on if/what the Spurs re-sign Manu with.
I don't know man. I think losing his entire career can help him to look past the money. Were I in his position (set for life) winning would mean more than anything else right now.
Amare in 2010 or bust!!
That's what everybody was saying about Corey Maggette this summer too. I wouldn't want Iverson even if he was willing to cut his salary in half.
Can't win.
No D.
No thanks.
Stay with loosers.
We should all in kill you for that thought...
We'd have the smallest frontcourt in the league.
No thanks. For the veteran minimum yes, Vaughn role.
He will likely end up back in Philly or resign with nuggs for a couple years.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions