Reply With Quote
Yeah because no doubt the Oilmen love Palin and the windfall tax on profits she hit their asses with.
You know more about Stem Cells...
Yup, McCain went against his own better judgment and that in itself is cause to wonder.
Yeah because no doubt the Oilmen love Palin and the windfall tax on profits she hit their asses with.
You know more about Stem Cells...
Come on whottt, you have to admit that McCain caving in against his own judgment shows a lack of leadership.
Oilmen sure like to have sex with the government employees that are supposed to be auditing them...
I already proposed whottt be nominated for a Nobel Prize (he took an Astronomy class in college) for thinking up Supermassive Black Holes. Who's with me?
Why would the Oilmen want Palin when there were so many better alternatives without a record of ass ing Oilcos like Palin has?(the only candidate in this election with such a record BTW).
Palin was selected to get the Pro-lifers(the only group on the right fantatical enough to run state and country level campaigns), the middle class, women and the pissed off Hillary supporters...
She's also one of the most charismatic politicians to come down the pipe in a while...
You don't see it yet, but you will on election day.
She's had more positive impact on a Presidential Campaign thany any VP selection in history...as evidenced by the RNC's record fund raising, appearance turnouts and TV ratings since she got the nod.
Anyone that thinks Palin was a stupid pick in terms of winning this election, is stupid.
alright. no one bit on it, so here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irena_Sendler
irena was more of a man than ol' albert could ever be.
That is true but the polls are also showing her initial excitement has dwindled and keeps going down the more she talks.
And if anyone can't see it wasn't the right move in the long run then they are stupid. Just plain stupid.
Wow, cons now are neglecting Nobel winners?
dude, whott, this guy practically wears obamapom-poms in here. it's like pissing in the wind with him.
it plummeted to 65%.
I bet not many politicians can pull that trick off...plummeting, and still having a 65% rating.
Did you know that 85% approval rating was one of the highest marks in history for any politician anywhere? And it had slumped...from over 90%.
Whottt is more interested in Sarah Palin's pom-poms.
It's about the money dip ...they think they'll get more of it under Obama. And there's absolutely nothing to indicate that's true...
Actually it's based upon beliefs, not a financial gain. I'm pretty sure intelligent minds want someone named not-Palin as responsible for this country.
From the letter:
During the administration of George W. Bush vital parts of our countries scientific enterprise have been damanged by stagnant or declining federal support.
Translation:
It's about the money.
These guys don't live on air you know....
They don't even mention McCain in their letter, they mention Bush...nor do they clearly state exactly why they are endorsing Obama.
mccain thinks embryos and fetuses are the same thing. a true progressive.
he voted for a bill to block fetal farming even though there was no fetal farming.
The funniest thing about this letter is when they say "our country"...and I'd be willing to bet the majority of them aren't even from America....unless of course every Nobel Laureate of 2008 is American. Which I highly doubt.
If only they had Pre-extraction embryonic stem cell research when your mama was Pregnant....and she had wanted to advance science.
If only....
just vote for the guy that claims victory in games that don't exist.
1) You advance knowledge by doing reasearch.
2) To do research you need money.
3) You don't actually care whether that money comes from the Federal or the State government. Stem cells research is heavily funded in the US by State, as well as charities money. More so than elsewhere in the world. It is highly questionable that had the Federal government decided to fund Stem Cells research, California would have put all that money into it. So Bush's decision had limited impact.
4) Even after the Yamanki experiments, the issue is far from over, as there are arguments against iPS=ES cells. You don't actually extract embryonic stem cells, you revert them from differentiated somatic cells.
5) The ethical issues are very relevant, if the iPS -resulting from the reversion- can actually produce a human being. In fact, they are even more dramatic, because one can technically take his own cells, revert them back to embryonic-like, and use them to create another self.
Would make a ty bumpersticker...you're either getting better or worse, I'll take you off ignore and keep an eye out for your posts to let you know which it is
Whott, not all people are obsessed by money.
Money is only important for those that don't have it.
These NObel laureates have no money problem whatsoever. They are people that are obsessed by their own brilliance, seldom by money.
Take from an insider.
The list contains Laureates from before 2008 of course.
And yes a lot were NOT born in America.
Benacerraf in Venezuela, Dieserhoffer in bavaria, Capecchi and Giacconi in Italy, Jim watson and Ollie Smithies in England, Nambu in Japan, in Russia the first that come to mind.
So what?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions