Reply With Quote
What stupid mother er wrote this hot pile of steaming ?
http://www.kb24.com/users/IJQfvoTS/blogs/413
Most people offten make that comparison between the two talking about whos better some may say Kobe and others may say M.j. now if you ask me M.j. is pretty nice dough his the master, one of the greatest ever to play this game, but I think Kobe is better in certain stan point, Kobe is better in terms of shooting the basketball, trust me even dough am a big Kobe fan and all, I still have a few Jordan dvds jus to also watch his game see what he does and see if his similar to Kobe or to see how his different from Kobe, belive it or not I watch M.j. occasionally cuz am to bussy watching Kobe but when I do get a chance to watch Jordan I do find some moves that Ive seen kobe do in the game, that tells me that Kobe may have picked up a few tricks from M.j. now back to what I was saying so Kobe can shoot, dribble better, and I know Jordan can score to but when it comes to going one on one Kobes in another level his lethal when it comes to that thats why is Black mamba his called that for a reason, Jordans better in terms of what his acomplished as a bball player in his carreer I mean he has 6 les, 10 times scoring chams like 5 mvps, finals mvps which Kobes yet to win, including defensive player of the year which is what kills me the most I feel like Kobe can defened and I just need him to win that award at least ones. So thats what separates Jordan from Kobe so we really cant make that comparison yet we gotta wait on till kobes finish with his carrer when is all said and done then we can site back and look at every thing that his acomplished, but Kobes not done yet he still got a good 8 or 9 years left in him hopefully more, Kobe I think has a lot of potetial to acomplish alot more probablly as much as M.j. but in that sense we cant really say Kobes better because his not yet done, but am telling yall right now Kobe will go down as the greatest player to ever play the game oh and he will be #1 in all time scoring passing Kareem, I allready think he is in my eyes but most people would disagree with me they would say am tripin so i cant say too much, I think as of right now in terms of jus scoring, puting the ball in the basket Kobes the best, Jordans carrer high is 69 pts thats nothing compare to Kobes 81 so yeah I think I can safely say that Kobes better, and will go down as the greatest ever.
What yall think?
What stupid mother er wrote this hot pile of steaming ?
Well, they both play the same position. That's about as close as Kobe is to Jordan.
Kobe is to Jordan as this author is to Shakespeare
Well, If Kobe can just win three more championships before he retires then he might start to SERIOUSLY be considered on Jordan's level by anyone other than people who dedicate web sites to him.
Even then, Kobe's argument will be tainted by the fact that Shaq was the the leader for three of those championships and Jordan took two years off during his prime to play baseball.
about right.
As Gino says, you can't compare the two until Kobe gets at least 3 more rings.
well, its somewhat true. kobe is better at 1 on 1s. that's only because jordan mostly goes for 1 on 5s just to even the odds.
i wouldn't go bragging about that 81 pts, not with the way the defense was allowed to play back then. handcheck anyone?
And 6 more Finals MVPs and 4 more MVPs.
This reads like someone from my mothers 3rd grade special Ed class typed it up.
Kobe needs 6 rings more than he has. He has yet win anything without Shaq. Jordan was the man on all his le teams.
Kobe won't get as many MVPs as Jordan did. But I think he has a chance at beating him in rings.
Jordan had Scottie Pippen so that won't be a requirement...it always takes two at least. As long as Kobe gets as many rings, it will go to the MVP count. I don't think Kobe can catch the MVPs so Kobe will still be behind until he surpasses MJ's ring count.
Did you just compare Shaq to Scottie Friggin Pippen??
I thought that Bigs were so much more valuable though? Just like Bynum, who any team would trade Manu or Parker or similar players for. If that was the case wouldn't the Bulls have traded Pippen for a big? Or at least in terms of 'chips, having a big is more valuable than Pippen.
Resubmitted for truth.
Yeah. Slim and none.
dude i stopped reading after all those typos.
Whut u talken about dough, dog? Which typoz?
Pippen is in the Greatest 50 players of all time I believe so although he's no Shaq, he gets good billing.
Jordan couldn't win until Pippen joined him either so it's similar to Kobe needing Shaq. So you can't discount Kobe's rings with Shaq, that's unreasonable. No player, no matter how great, is going to win it on his own.
Wouldn't be too quick with that but let's start with 1 this year first.
For Kobe haters, the ultimate nightmare would be if he got 3-4 more rings because he would probably take his place next to his Airness
Why do Laker fans feel the need to bring up this crap all the time ? It just gives people a chance to say something negative about Kobe. No one outside of LA (and even some LA fans) will ever concede that Bryant > Jordan. And honestly, no one gives a damn right now !!
Mike got the Finals MVPs, not Pippen.
Shaq got the Finals MVPs, not Kobe.
It's unreasonable to allow for a better Kobe/Jordan comparison by comparing Shaq to Pippen. Shaq did the heavy lifting for those Lakers championships.
I won't go so far as saying Kobe needs to win 6 more rings to be in the same category as Jordan. But, I think he would need at least another 4 with 4 Finals MVPs and at least a couple more League MVPs to make a legit argument, because he won't be able to catch Jordan's League MVPs or Finals MVPs, so he'd have to trump Jordan with rings with 7 to make a strong enough argument.
I'm not saying it's quite comparable, just that you can't throw them out just because he won with Shaq. History has a way of forgetting the details, if Kobe gets 6 rings, it'll be said that Shaq was the one who couldn't have won without Kobe. Very similar to the talk now outside of SA that KG is better than Duncan because KG's ring is in the now and people forget what Duncan's done.
Kobe has an outside chance at catching the Finals MVP count but no way he'll ever catch MJ on league MVPs.
I do agree, it'd take 7 rings for Kobe to make a strong argument, matching 6 would start the comparisons but just not enough.
, Kobe could end up with 10 Rings
No one around the league thinks KG is better than Duncan
I'm pretty sure Celtic fans think so. Which would make it the same case as the Jordan/Kobe debate...which really isn't much of a debate at all.
That would be like Spurs fans saying Manu is better than Kobe. We love our team, but we are not blind.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
