Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 54
  1. #1
    Silence surpasses speech. duncan228's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    27,693
    Spurs reserve faces crucial days
    By Jeff McDonald

    In the second half of his Spurs preseason debut Saturday, Salim Stoudamire attempted something he'd recommend no player recovering from a strained groin try.

    The high hurdles.

    Stoudamire was closing in fast on Indiana's T.J. Ford, when the Pacers guard abruptly stopped his drive and up-faked. The move sent a surprised Stoudamire leaping over Ford's head and, ultimately, crashing shoulder-first into the court.

    The entire AT&T Center seemed to cringe at once.

    “It wasn't as bad as it looked,” Stoudamire said afterward.

    Stoudamire came out of his first preseason game no worse for wear, an important first step in his bid to make the Spurs and revive his flailing career. He had been out of practice since Sept. 30 with an injured left groin.

    The 26-year-old former Atlanta Hawks guard is in camp on a make-good deal. In order to guarantee the full value of his contract, he must first earn a roster spot.

    In that regard, he is guaranteed nothing, and he knows it.

    “It's do-or-die as far as my situation is concerned,” Stoudamire said. “It's a challenge, and I'm looking forward to it.”

    Over the next eight days, leading up to the NBA's Oct. 27 deadline for roster cuts, Stoudamire will do his best to earn a nameplate over his locker at the AT&T Center. At the very least, perhaps he can force the Spurs to recover the one belonging to his older cousin Damon, who appeared in 38 games with the team last season, out of the trash heap.

    One thing working in Stoudamire's favor: His resume contains real NBA experience, and Spurs coach Gregg Popovich tends to prefer players who have demonstrated they can play in the league.

    Taken by Atlanta with the first pick in the second round of the 2005 draft, Stoudamire spent his first three seasons with the Hawks — though a falling out with coach Mike Woodson eventually precipitated his departure this offseason.

    One thing working against Stoudamire in San Antonio: Simple mathematics.

    The Spurs already have three points guard with guaranteed contracts — Tony Parker, Jacque Vaughn and rookie George Hill.

    Popovich says he would have to think long and hard about keeping a fourth point man.

    “That would be difficult to do,” Popovich said. “Salim knows he's in a tough spot. He hasn't been able to play. So he's going to want to show us he's got skills we can't resist.”

    Stoudamire, a career 40.7 percent shooter, wasn't irresistible in his preseason debut against the Pacers, but was intriguing.

    The Spurs believe he could serve the same purpose Eddie House did for the Boston Celtics last season, providing quick-strike offense in well-timed spurts off the bench.

    Ten seconds into his first-quarter stint Saturday, Stoudamire showed why, uncoiling his smooth left-handed stroke and draining a 17-footer.

    He finished with eight points on 3-of-11 shooting in 21 minutes of the Spurs' 106-98 victory. Not bad for shaking off the rust.

    “It's always hard when you haven't played for a while,” Parker said, “but I thought he did all right.”

    If the Spurs do decide to keep Stoudamire, there are steps they could take to loosen the logjam at point guard.

    They could look to trade Vaughn, who is in the final year of a reasonable contract that would pay him $1.2 million this season.

    Popovich, however, values Vaughn for his steady hand and leadership, as well his potential to mentor the newcomer Hill. So the Spurs might rather keep him around.

    Stoudamire could become more attractive to the point-guard laden Spurs if he shows he could play shooting guard as well. At 6-foot-1, he would be undersized for that role on a consistent basis, but could be of use against smaller lineups.

    “The other possibility is if he could play some ‘two' (shooting guard) or George Hill could play some ‘two,'” Popovich said. “If he played well enough to make us think in that direction, we could do it with a different sort of flexibility — using Salim and George as ‘one-twos,' so to speak.”

  2. #2
    obligatory troll smasher Flux451's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    1,311
    That last idea sounds interesting.
    I hope we keep Farmer/Salim. I also like the idea of Bolliver because they would both be playing there hearts out compe ively.



    Spurs reserve faces crucial days
    By Jeff McDonald

    In the second half of his Spurs preseason debut Saturday, Salim Stoudamire attempted something he'd recommend no player recovering from a strained groin try.

    The high hurdles.

    Stoudamire was closing in fast on Indiana's T.J. Ford, when the Pacers guard abruptly stopped his drive and up-faked. The move sent a surprised Stoudamire leaping over Ford's head and, ultimately, crashing shoulder-first into the court.

    The entire AT&T Center seemed to cringe at once.

    “It wasn't as bad as it looked,” Stoudamire said afterward.

    Stoudamire came out of his first preseason game no worse for wear, an important first step in his bid to make the Spurs and revive his flailing career. He had been out of practice since Sept. 30 with an injured left groin.

    The 26-year-old former Atlanta Hawks guard is in camp on a make-good deal. In order to guarantee the full value of his contract, he must first earn a roster spot.

    In that regard, he is guaranteed nothing, and he knows it.

    “It's do-or-die as far as my situation is concerned,” Stoudamire said. “It's a challenge, and I'm looking forward to it.”

    Over the next eight days, leading up to the NBA's Oct. 27 deadline for roster cuts, Stoudamire will do his best to earn a nameplate over his locker at the AT&T Center. At the very least, perhaps he can force the Spurs to recover the one belonging to his older cousin Damon, who appeared in 38 games with the team last season, out of the trash heap.

    One thing working in Stoudamire's favor: His resume contains real NBA experience, and Spurs coach Gregg Popovich tends to prefer players who have demonstrated they can play in the league.

    Taken by Atlanta with the first pick in the second round of the 2005 draft, Stoudamire spent his first three seasons with the Hawks — though a falling out with coach Mike Woodson eventually precipitated his departure this offseason.

    One thing working against Stoudamire in San Antonio: Simple mathematics.

    The Spurs already have three points guard with guaranteed contracts — Tony Parker, Jacque Vaughn and rookie George Hill.

    Popovich says he would have to think long and hard about keeping a fourth point man.

    “That would be difficult to do,” Popovich said. “Salim knows he's in a tough spot. He hasn't been able to play. So he's going to want to show us he's got skills we can't resist.”

    Stoudamire, a career 40.7 percent shooter, wasn't irresistible in his preseason debut against the Pacers, but was intriguing.

    The Spurs believe he could serve the same purpose Eddie House did for the Boston Celtics last season, providing quick-strike offense in well-timed spurts off the bench.

    Ten seconds into his first-quarter stint Saturday, Stoudamire showed why, uncoiling his smooth left-handed stroke and draining a 17-footer.

    He finished with eight points on 3-of-11 shooting in 21 minutes of the Spurs' 106-98 victory. Not bad for shaking off the rust.

    “It's always hard when you haven't played for a while,” Parker said, “but I thought he did all right.”

    If the Spurs do decide to keep Stoudamire, there are steps they could take to loosen the logjam at point guard.

    They could look to trade Vaughn, who is in the final year of a reasonable contract that would pay him $1.2 million this season.

    Popovich, however, values Vaughn for his steady hand and leadership, as well his potential to mentor the newcomer Hill. So the Spurs might rather keep him around.

    Stoudamire could become more attractive to the point-guard laden Spurs if he shows he could play shooting guard as well. At 6-foot-1, he would be undersized for that role on a consistent basis, but could be of use against smaller lineups.

    “The other possibility is if he could play some ‘two' (shooting guard) or George Hill could play some ‘two,'” Popovich said. “If he played well enough to make us think in that direction, we could do it with a different sort of flexibility — using Salim and George as ‘one-twos,' so to speak.”

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    2,681
    He finished with eight points on 3-of-11 shooting... Not bad for shaking off the rust.
    How is shooting 27% not bad, especially from a guy not known for defense?

  4. #4
    Believe. jayc23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    442
    cut him

  5. #5
    Realistic Spurs Fan Amuseddaysleeper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    17,732
    seriously

  6. #6
    I'm Mavs>Spurs bitch Allanon's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    12,224
    Salim probably has the most unknown talent upside of the current camp players. But coming in this late, I don't think he'll have a chance to impress. He's a goner.

  7. #7
    Veteran Manufan909's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    5,049
    Salim probably has the most unknown talent upside of the current camp players. But coming in this late, I don't think he'll have a chance to impress. He's a goner.
    From your mouth to Pop's beard. As long as Hairston or Farmer make it, I'm half ok. But the other half being Salim or Gaines would ruin it for me.

  8. #8
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    “That would be difficult to do,” Popovich said. “Salim knows he's in a tough spot. He hasn't been able to play. So he's going to want to show us he's got skills we can't resist.”

    “The other possibility is if he could play some ‘two' (shooting guard) or George Hill could play some ‘two,'” Popovich said. “If he played well enough to make us think in that direction, we could do it with a different sort of flexibility — using Salim and George as ‘one-twos,' so to speak.”
    Interesting quotes from Pop. It's like he's talking himself into how he'd justify keeping Hill, Vaughn and Stoudamire.


    If the Spurs do decide to keep Stoudamire, there are steps they could take to loosen the logjam at point guard.

    They could look to trade Vaughn, who is in the final year of a reasonable contract that would pay him $1.2 million this season.
    A lot of us here have mentioned the possibility of moving Vaughn to open up a roster spot. While I like Vaughn as a leader and as a third point guard, I question whether Pop has confidence in him anymore. He didn't think about playing him in the playoffs, which is a bad sign when you play for Pop and usually an indication that your time is over.

    A trade that might make sense is Vaughn to the Orlando Magic. The Magic could use a point guard after Mike Wilks was lost for the season with a knee injury. Vaughn for Marcin Gortat could make sense. The Spurs would waive Gortat, which would save ~500K from just waiving Vaughn. The Magic are right up against the lux tax threshold, but this trade would keep them just below it.

    I think odds are that Pop will keep Vaughn but I'm not sure. On top of Vaughn's playoff status, in a recent interview, Pop was asked what he wants from a backup point guard. Pop said scoring. That's the opposite of what Vaughn brings and it's exactly what Stoudamire brings.

  9. #9
    veni, vidi, vici naico's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    1,275
    Get rid of Vaughn and sign Farmer and Hairston. If Pop wants to keep his Tolliver he can, but i'd give Salim a shot.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Post Count
    1,807
    Interesting quotes from Pop. It's like he's talking himself into how he'd justify keeping Hill, Vaughn and Stoudamire.


    A lot of us here have mentioned the possibility of moving Vaughn to open up a roster spot. While I like Vaughn as a leader and as a third point guard, I question whether Pop has confidence in him anymore. He didn't think about playing him in the playoffs, which is a bad sign when you play for Pop and usually an indication that your time is over.

    A trade that might make sense is Vaughn to the Orlando Magic. The Magic could use a point guard after Mike Wilks was lost for the season with a knee injury. Vaughn for Marcin Gortat could make sense. The Spurs would waive Gortat, which would save ~500K from just waiving Vaughn. The Magic are right up against the lux tax threshold, but this trade would keep them just below it.

    I think odds are that Pop will keep Vaughn but I'm not sure. On top of Vaughn's playoff status, in a recent interview, Pop was asked what he wants from a backup point guard. Pop said scoring. That's the opposite of what Vaughn brings and it's exactly what Stoudamire brings.
    Some of us suggested a trade to Orlando in a thread yesterday, citing the Wilks injury as well.

    The Gortat option is a good thought. Orlando does have an exception that they could use. It would put them in luxury tax territory by a couple hundred thousand, though. Gortat, by the way, has played pretty well this preseason and Battie has shaky legs.

    Reading between the lines, I don't think the Spurs are willing to eat Vaughn's contract. If they can't move him, they won't waive him. If they can move him, they'll keep Stoudamire.

  11. #11
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    Some of us suggested a trade to Orlando in a thread yesterday, citing the Wilks injury as well.

    The Gortat option is a good thought. Orlando does have an exception that they could use. It would put them in luxury tax territory by a couple hundred thousand, though. Gortat, by the way, has played pretty well this preseason and Battie has shaky legs.

    Reading between the lines, I don't think the Spurs are willing to eat Vaughn's contract. If they can't move him, they won't waive him. If they can move him, they'll keep Stoudamire.
    As much as Pop values vets, and he said as much in the article, it's extremely unlikely that he'll move Vaughn. JV is probably worth more to the Spurs as a mentor for Hill, than he is as a 3rd PG.

  12. #12
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    IMO, Vaughn is not going anywhere, at least until February. Same thing with Bonner.
    To be honest, I would rather have Farmer make the team than Salim.

  13. #13
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    Why keep a contract if it won't help you? The Spurs ate Ron mercer's contract in 2004. Vaughn's contract would be less that what the ate of Ron's.

    Vaughn probably won't be used in the playoffs again this season.

    I also mentioned trading Vaughn to Orlando the other day. That could be a good option too.

    Pop should be looking at players he thinks might help us in the playoffs. Stoudamire could be one of those players. Farmer could be one of those players. Tolliver could be one of those players. Stop taking up roster spots for players that aren't going to help us.

    btw with Tolliver I'm starting to think that both he and Bonner could really push each other like they've been doing in these last two preseason games. So maybe having both wouldn't be such a bad thing?
    Last edited by Ice009; 10-20-2008 at 08:37 AM.

  14. #14
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Why keep a contract if it won't help you? The Spurs ate Ron mercer's contract in 2004. Vaughn's is a lot smaller.

    Vaughn probably won't be used in the playoffs again this season. Vaughn couldn't really help us last season in the playoffs at all. What is he going to do for us this time?
    As stated in the article, he can be a good mentor for Hill. He's a guy that understands the system well, and his work ethic is indisputable.

    Pop should be looking at players he think might help us in the playoffs. Stoudamire could be one of those players.
    You can look to see what's available in February, when some teams probably are starting to tank because their season is not going their way. I don't think we need to rush and act right now.

  15. #15
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    As stated in the article, he can be a good mentor for Hill. He's a guy that understands the system well, and his work ethic is indisputable.



    You can look to see what's available in February, when some teams probably are starting to tank because their season is not going their way. I don't think we need to rush and act right now.
    We've got enough guys that know the system and can be mentors.

    We could wait until the trade deadline. What if we do and get nothing?

  16. #16
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    I still like Watkins on this roster, moreso than Stoudamire.

  17. #17
    PRICELESS SPURS FAN polandprzem's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    16,433
    By all the ways

    Gortat is the only polish guy in the NBA if someone don't know.

  18. #18
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    We've got enough guys that know the system and can be mentors.
    You know Pop, he likes veterans to carry such duties. Like Finley... or Vaughn.

    We could wait until the trade deadline. What if we do and get nothing?
    We roll with what we have. Other than Barry and Horry, we haven't lost any other player that makes the rotation in the playoffs anyways. Mason is there to cover for Barry, and KT should be more comfortable now after a year here.
    We're going to go as far as the big 3 takes us anyways. If you think we're going to make a splash and make a Gasol type of deal you have to be kidding yourself.

  19. #19
    Big Mo MoSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    7,185
    Salim isn't that much better than Vaughn except that he shoots the ball better. I don't think Pop would trade Vaughn unless he knows he's going to get something the team really needs in return.

  20. #20
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Post Count
    1,807
    Salim isn't that much better than Vaughn except that he shoots the ball better. I don't think Pop would trade Vaughn unless he knows he's going to get something the team really needs in return.
    Yes, but shooting is a need and priority for Pop. See TimVP's post from above.

  21. #21
    Believe. Tlegacy7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    16
    We need scoring for when the Spurs go on their droughts. I know Pop loves his vets but we need some new blood in there. I respect what Vaughn has done for us(just like I respect any player who dons a Spurs uniform) but I think its time he moved on. Without Manu who is our offensive spark plug off the bench?

  22. #22
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    If you keep Stoudamire, Spurs will have a logjam on the perimeter when Manu will be back in one month.
    It will be nearly impossible for Pop to give playing time to Stoudamire and Hill and Mason. One of these three players will end up in the doghouse. Hill deserves to get consistent playing time with Spurs to improve his game and Mason is paid nearly $4M. Stoudamire is likely the one that will end up in the doghouse.

    If Spurs keep Stoudamire, they will have a half useful player for one month and then have a player who won't be able to get playing with Spurs and can't be send to Austin. Great...

    I rather see Spurs try to use this roster spot on a young player who will be send to Austin to work on his game. This young player could be Hairston or a waived player from another team (like ***** *****! a couple of years ago).

  23. #23
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    If you keep Stoudamire, Spurs will have a logjam on the perimeter when Manu will be back in one month.
    Exactly. I think the backcourt is stocked enough. I simply don't see the net benefit of having Stoudamire in, what will be, a very, crowded backcourt. There just wont be enough minutes to go around. If they can't get scoring out of Mason and Hill, then they're in big trouble.

    I rather see Spurs try to use this roster spot on a young player who will be send to Austin to work on his game. This young player could be Hairston or a waived player from another team (like ***** *****! a couple of years ago).
    I believe the frontline development has been largely ignored - especially with Ian's unfortunate injury. Outside of Duncan, this team is lacking a paint presence. To your point, I'd rather see them use a roster spot on a developmental player like Watkins or Hairston. Though he has only limited NBA experience with Sac-town, Watkins CAN provide post defense, rebounding and shotblocking in spot duty this season. Hairston, with some Austin seasoning, could begin to pay dividends as early as next year. IMO, these are the two most important developmental players they should have in the pipeline.

  24. #24
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Post Count
    1,807
    If you keep Stoudamire, Spurs will have a logjam on the perimeter when Manu will be back in one month.
    It will be nearly impossible for Pop to give playing time to Stoudamire and Hill and Mason. One of these three players will end up in the doghouse. Hill deserves to get consistent playing time with Spurs to improve his game and Mason is paid nearly $4M. Stoudamire is likely the one that will end up in the doghouse.

    If Spurs keep Stoudamire, they will have a half useful player for one month and then have a player who won't be able to get playing with Spurs and can't be send to Austin. Great...

    I rather see Spurs try to use this roster spot on a young player who will be send to Austin to work on his game. This young player could be Hairston or a waived player from another team (like ***** *****! a couple of years ago).
    Bruno, good stuff as always.

    That player would either be Malik Hairston or a waiver claim. I'm a strong proponent of roster spots 14 and 15 always being reserved for Austin assignments. Convert the suits into jerseys. But it doesn't look to be in the cards this season.

    I'm not confident San Antonio will go in this direction, however. My working theory is that Pop wants to play faster this season, using Tony Parker off ball more often. He tried this last season, but D. Stoudamire and Vaughn tainted the results.

    I also think that San Antonio will be amongst league leaders in 3 point attempts, especially when adjusted for pace. Having said this, my bet would be that Pop wants to keep Farmer, Stoudamire and Tolliver after moving Vaughn. Buford and Demps are arguing for Hairston. Purely conjecture, but that's where I think it's at.

    Farmer and Stoudamire as deep bench options give the Spurs a good mix of players and would go far in alleviating offensive struggles. Defensively, they're tolerable for the short minutes they'd play.

    Whatever happens, the Spurs roster will be improved over last season and will set up nicely for 2009-10. After such a disappointing off season, camp has been something of an encouragement.

  25. #25
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Post Count
    1,807
    Exactly. I think the backcourt is stocked enough. I simply don't see the net benefit of having Stoudamire in, what will be, a very, crowded backcourt. There just wont be enough minutes to go around. If they can't get scoring out of Mason and Hill, then they're in big trouble.



    I believe the frontline development has been largely ignored - especially with Ian's unfortunate injury. Outside of Duncan, this team is lacking a paint presence. To your point, I'd rather see them use a roster spot on a developmental player like Watkins or Hairston. Though he has only limited NBA experience with Sac-town, Watkins CAN provide post defense, rebounding and shotblocking in spot duty this season. Hairston, with some Austin seasoning, could begin to pay dividends as early as next year. IMO, these are the two most important developmental players they should have in the pipeline.
    Wing and front line development are both areas of concern, everyone agrees. I'm not sold on Watkins as a pipeline player, however. The Spurs will have an opportunity at Javtokas and Gist next summer, and a remote chance at Splitter in 2010. So the pipeline is not completely dry. And Mahinmi and Tolliver have yet to completely flush out. So we'll have to wait and see. But ideally, the Spurs would be grooming one rotation big man in Austin.

    Rather than Watkins, I'd like to see the Toros draft prospect bigs with their first two picks and hope for the best. Steven Hill and Richard Hendrix would be nice. But for this season, 15 is not a workable number for an assignee. How I wish the NBDL rules were set up a bit differently.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •