The first step to nationalized media?
![]()
Wow. This doesn't seem right. Why would you piss off the media two weeks before the election?
The first step to nationalized media?
![]()
Wouldn't the government pay for nationalized media? This seems more capitalist than anything.
'Tis why I said the first step.
![]()
Yeah I don't get LJ's comment at all unless he was just tossing AHF a softball.
WTF, you think the AntiChrist victory party should be free? How does everyone expect them to pay for the hookers and blow?
The networks have been hyping this campaign and sucking it for every drop, dragging it out, and amplifying every scurrilous turd of slime and lies.
Why shouldn't they pay? They pay for Superbowl, Olympics, etc
The Business of America is Show Business
What they . HUSSEIN gets falsely accused of socialism, but when he goes entrepreneurial capitalism, he gets trashed, too. all y'all
Eh, let me know how much Chicago hotels and escort services are charging that night too.
I doubt the press will pass those services up either.
The Book of Revelations 11:4 says -
"And then the fifth horn blew. And the Dragon, preparing for Victory, gathered the scribes from the twelve tribes and commanded a he for his companionship."
haha. Damn. Angel Luv was right![]()
I was expecting AHF to take a harder swing.
This sounds more like thinning the herd than anything, although it'd be interesting to see what the norm is.
Classic that some of you would single me out. Eh, whatever. I'm disappointed in the lack of thought from what are normally some very rational posters.
I've posted a lot of articles on here in an attempt to counter all the leftist bull , but I've realized of late that's a lost cause.
By swing I meant I wanted you to do the homework. Could this be the beginning of nationalized media? Probably not. But if it's totally out of the norm, perhaps it could be the beginning to something.
As a standalone news item, it's a tad bit fishy . . .
I don't know AHF, all you've done is post some weak articles addressing what are pretty much non issues. I don't know what reaction you've been expecting.
What gets me is they think they're intellectuals.
These suckers don't have a thought(analytical or otherwise) independent of CNN, DailyKos or Huffington post and think they're intellectuals.
What would be your description of a real intellectual? lots of Shakespeare and Tolstoy? Just wondering.
whottt's definition of intellectual = Sarah Palin
He supports her because he knows this is the one time in history someone dumber than him has the chance to be this close to the White House
Oh wait, I forgot about GWB
Shakespeare didn't write the plays. Sir Francis Bacon did.
![]()
I consider George Will to be a real intellectual... and think it's unfortunate that so many republicans shun him because he's "nerdy," and instead prefer to admire people like Rush, Hannity, and O'Reilly, who seem very anti-intellectual to me.
Pleeeez-- he couldn't even write better essays than Montaigne. Edward DeVere, The 17th Earl of Oxford... now that's a conspiracy theory that has some teeth!
That says alot more about democrats than republicans. Is there a counterpart to George Will's above the frey mentality in the Liberal editorial pages?
Thought not.
They are all a bunch of cheerleaders who do the free campaigning for Obama.
The Democrats have squashed dissent in their own ranks, and will squash it in the united states.
I know, it's only lame when the dirty neocons do it, but real cool when Obama does it.
Crocodile Tear, Oppurtunistic Defenders of the Cons ution, Neo patriots, Corporate Coffee bar/bookstore intellectuals. You define patriotism and the cons ution to define your distorted version of the american vision.
Your formula is simple for cons utional interpretation.
IF it helps your socialistic principles fine, if not, illegal and unpatriotic.
I mean it's democrats telling americans that its patriotic to pay high taxes when we fought the brits for that same reason.
Obama is your messiah, he supplants a need for God.
WHile i don't believe Angel Luvs assertion.
She's somewhat correct.
Nothing you've written has anything to do with me. If you dislike the general liberal view of things, that's fine. All of the other things-- messiah, calling people unpatriotic, illegal, etc,. is stuff you are projecting from other arguments that you must've had with other people, because I've never said anything remotely like that.
You want examples of people or a literal definition?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)