Reply With Quote
tim didn't read the story.
http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/...56/detail.html
...said the woman refused medical treatment after the assault, which happened outside the view of the bank's surveillance cameras.
tim didn't read the story.
I would be interested to see how you do on the "Reading Comprehension" portion of the SAT.
Nobody in that thread was saying McCain was DIRECTLY responsible for the attack. Nobody in that thread believes McCain told his supporters to attack that woman.
What they are saying is McCain is purposefully injecting fear and hate into the political environment to garner votes, which as a side effect increases the likelihood that a supporter will do something stupid out of anger. You seem to fundamentally not understand this important distinction.
The key being whether she was assaulted at all. Have the results of the ATM video been released?
of course not. he's more than happy to throw out his ASSumptions and completely inaccurate conclusions so he can trash "Obama s" as he likes to call them. his shtick is completely predictable.
what part of "outside the view of the bank's surveillance cameras" don't you understand? god damn you are one dumb .
I want the press to be respectful to her. Since she's gone public, I hope she's prepared to answer questions fairly. Certainly I hope she's treated with kindness by those who deal directly with her.
I hope that anyone investigating this does so responsibly and carefully, but thoroughly and with skepticism.
I hope that anyone who treats her with bile gets -slapped by karma.
If she's an innocent victim I hope the criminal responsible is caught and held responsible. I hope she gets any help she needs.
If she's putting forward a hoax, then I hope she doesn't cause too much damage to anyone's reputation and that she gets the help she needs.
As for what happens on a message board and who happens to say what? Who cares? I'm not sure it matters and I don't think there's anything wrong with anyone posting links, asking questions, or speculating. Making jokes about it might be off-color, but that's how some people deal with the unfortunate things we face in society. I don't see how talking about this issue or questioning it does any harm.
Just my take.
Seriously, do I have to piece this together? I said review the ATM video tape. I didn't say review the video tape of her getting the B etched on her face.
RIF.
The cameras would be valuable for more than just the attack. They might show if the guy walked by, if he initiated the attack at the ATM. They also might show other cars/witnesses that could have seen the attacker or the victim prior to the attack.
Are you really this stupid? You astound me with how damn dumb you. It's amazing.
All know is the ASSAULT took place outside of the video. Not the robbery."The attack began at 8:50 pm ET and Ashley called the police at 9:30 PM ET. Initially, she was robbed, ran away after the robbery, and the robber followed her to her car. At that point, he became enraged at the bumper sticker and began beating her and scratched the ‘B’ into her face. Ashley went to the hospital early this morning after initially refusing medical attention last night, and had an MRI and/or a CAT scan. Doctors believe her cheek will heal fully."
Got damn. Log off the internet if you can't follow.
i'd bet my life she withdrew 60 bucks. she can't be that stupid. i'm also pretty sure she was completely alone.
My post wasn't meant as an insult. I just thought that you had missed that sentence in the original story.
Exactly. Pretty sure. Why not check the tape to see if she was alone or you can see the robbery?
Yeah, I just had to include your post since some others in this thread need their hand held through the discussion.
How would they know the attack took place outside the view of the surveillance cameras unless they viewed the surveillance cameras???
Because ATM cameras don't pan around like spotlights. When she pointed to the spot where it happened, if it was more than a few feet from the ATM, the cop would have known it was out of the line of sight of the camera.
that. i'd pay off a black man to take this rap, and pronto!!!
I agree with all of that. None of us are doing any harm. The ones who might be doing harm are the ones doing the actual digging. Sifting through the dirt during the excavation is fine since it's already unearthed.
Why do I get the feeling the surveillance tapes will end up showing us nothing?
Holy what a stupid azz mufuka.
MaryAnnKilledGinger has to be Rookie of the Year for Spurstalk, no?
Oh the gutter press? I'm right there with you. I'm also pretty ticked off at the nasty messages on her blog page right now. It's vile stuff. Especially when people can't know all the facts yet.
If it is a hoax, they could be very useful in helping to prove it. It would be hard to explain someone just standing there, for example, if an assault was taking place twenty feet away. I'd also be interested to know what's across the street and if there were any cameras over there.
I'll say this, if it is a hoax the Republicans would not be dumb enough to it up.
They are too good at this.
if there were a shred of hope for this being true, it would be the only topic on fox ALL DAY.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
