Reply With Quote
after all of mccains experience, he gave khalidi half a million dollars.
They all fit. Would you like me to mix them up a bit?
Just not as relevant as you want it to be. All of it was reported. There simply isn't anything more to these stories.
He has been in public office for some time now. That makes for quite a public record. If you are too stupid to realize that, it's not my problem.
You said close friendship. You lied. This is why you are a .
Wow, "Nobama" -- what does that even mean? Very used tampon of you. "Allegedly" -- wow, that's really amazing. Really a burning issue for our times.
That's great because these have never been the criteria I use for voting.
Really got to you, didn't I?
No -- you are just Dung.
he has been in office for "some time" now - then what is his record ? How much of that corruption in Chicago did he fix ? How about that Sarkozy fellow or those Fannie Mae ties ?
It is relevant -- but not for now because the media who love the messiah don't want it to be. Same reason that Stevens was convicted and Charlie Rangel roams the earth a free man.
after all of mccains experience, he gave khalidi half a million dollars.
I want to know why Obama hasn't handed out ponies to everyone yet! WAHHHH!!
And you're a
It's PUBLIC RECORD. Meaning you can look it up. Have you looked it up?he has been in office for "some time" now - then what is his record ?
There has been nothing new in any of these stories, even after much investigation conservatives. The right wing has been pumping dry wells for months. They've been trying, but there is simply no there there. So, they just repeat the same charges over and over and over and over again, and it just becomes background noise. Too bad for youIt is relevant -- but not for now because the media who love the messiah don't want it to be.
So you now say the media controls the US justice system.Same reason that Stevens was convicted and Charlie Rangel roams the earth a free man.
You are insane.
And you're a
It's PUBLIC RECORD. Meaning you can look it up. Have you looked it up?
There has been nothing new in any of these stories, even after much investigation conservatives. The right wing has been pumping dry wells for months. They've been trying, but there is simply no there there. So, they just repeat the same charges over and over and over and over again, and it just becomes background noise. Too bad for you
So you now say the media controls the US justice system.
You are insane.
I know it is public -- I did look it up -- it says , "present"
Ah, so you didn't look it up at all. You read a blog.
Classic.
I'm gonna highlight this for a certain person who has trouble understanding.
no he didnt .. the IRI gave an organization that Khalidi was a part of half a million dollars and it was atually $498K and some change
McCain was CHAIRMAN of the IRI. The IRI gave a group co-founded by Khalidi almost half a million dollars.
yes that is correct - exactly what I said twenty posts ago
i'm going to use a republican tactic........
"mccain gave khalidi half a million dollars to kill jews".
McCain is on Larry King tonight so I'll see what he has to say.
So you think McCain had no say in where the money was given. Gotcha.
no i didnt say that -- you said mccain gave khalidi a half a million dollars. -- when actually the IRI - of which McCain was chair gave an organization of which Khalidi was a part of $498K and some change
McCain's organization gave Khalidi's organization half a million dollars.
Why isn't the mainstream media reporting this 24 hours nonstop?
They are biased in favor of McCain!
I didn't say McCain gave him half a million dollars. I'm saying McCain was the chairman of an organization that thought Khalidi's organization deserved half a million dollars. I'm saying McCain is an enormous hypocrite because if he thought Khalidi was such a bad guy then he could've stopped that payment back when it was allocated.
thats what i said. mccain gave khalidi half a million dollars.
and it was in 1998
Yeah, and McCain was only 63 at the time.
so, mccain and saddam paid people to kill jews?
Wait...I thought Obama being on a board with Ayers was relevant????? I guess not since it was sooooooooooo long ago. God I hate hypocrites.
Obama launched his political career from Ayers house.
but I never said it was irrelevant being from 1998 -- I just added that to the facts of the story.
Why did you feel that detail was important?
Why isn't it important ?
I didn't post it. Tell us why you posted it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions