If we let women vote, soon illegal immigrants and children will want to vote too.
i dont act s if gay or straight people will have sex in public or any of those other acts dude listed above...
if the definition of marraige is altered - it will open the door for lawsuits galore -- one of which will be joe bob the 50 year old - wants to be married to stevie the 11 year old kid. - -yes I assure you that will happen along with many other lawsuits... IMO
If we let women vote, soon illegal immigrants and children will want to vote too.
What's stopping that from happening now with an 11 year old girl? I'm really interested to see how you answer this one.
they already vote -- and dead people and cartoon characters too -- don't you keep up with Acorn ?
This wouldn't even be an issue if we hadn't decided to let whites and negros intermarry.
after women got the vote, the voting age got dropped so yes
They're also fantastic dressers.Gays are extremely proactive
Its not their fault they are not supposed to reproduce.
Great point. Way to stay on topic.
Did they use tax-exempt money to play politics? Hmmm and that would be who's fault? TheirsA church that took out newspaper ads criticizing President Bill Clinton in 1992 lost its federal tax exemption.
What if I am, ?
I don't even know where to begin with this.
Also if you are for gay marriage then you are also for sterile siblings getting married, cause if not you are a hypocrite.
The reasoning for this being the only way to justify outlawing sibling marriages is because their kids will grow up re ed. But if one is sterile, then there is no real legitimate reason to not let them marry.
![]()
Last edited by Trainwreck2100; 10-31-2008 at 03:10 PM.
No problem, I suppose you can't be expected to know my sexuality because you can't see if I'm wearing men's or women's clothing.
2 Unapologetic Bigots and a Thread.
Goddamn, I love this site.
When you say "come out and admit they are gay", do you mean here at ST?
This is an interesting thing to say. I was trying to make a similar point earlier. Any time the state excludes some people from marriage, the state must furnish some justification. Presently, under the federal cons ution, forbidding polygamy, incest, and gay marriage are all subject to rational basis review--in essence, the state just needs SOME reason that isn't absolutely nutty. With sterile siblings, there's no compelling reason like birth defects to justify exclusion. It's just gross.
I am for gay marriage. I am against sterile siblings marrying. You know why? Because it's gross, that's why. Call me a bigot.
I disagree with your "hypocrite" statement, though.
Yaaaaaaay!
Boooooooo!I am against sterile siblings marrying. You know why? Because it's gross, that's why. Call me a bigot.
Um...I disagree with your "hypocrite" statement, though.
Kind oooooooooof!
Count me as undecided on sterile siblings who want to marry. All two examples in the history of human civilization.
What about adopted siblings getting married? It's illegal in Texas.
What about adopted, gay, albino siblings?
![]()
There are matters of insurance. If your sibling had a disease and no insurance then another sibling who maybe had it could "marry" them to give them their benefits. But not actually live that married lifestyle.
Good point. That may be a better route to argue against gay marriage than the destruction of the ins ution of marriage.
Who the wants to marry more than one woman? I say go for it if you got the balls![]()
Are they really hot with low self-esteem?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)