Reply With Quote
And if you turn it upside down, it kinda looks like a pirate with no face wearing a red and white striped bandana with a blue beard!
I don't see it. Move the three red lines around and you see it's just based on the Nero Cross...sign of the antichrist. No big deal.
And if you turn it upside down, it kinda looks like a pirate with no face wearing a red and white striped bandana with a blue beard!
I can explain this...he only pulled about 8-9 million more viewers than Perot did in 1992, Perot pulled about 20 million viewers and incidentally...that coincided just about perfectly with the 19 million votes he got.
Obama pulled about 29-30 million viewers....you better hope he gets a substantially better viewer to voter ratio than Perot got.
Maybe if he had invited Palin to appear he'd have got some legitimate big viewing totals.
She pulls Superbowl ratings in primetime
Seriously...I expected 50-60 million people to watch this...he got about half that.
It's become pretty obvious that the only politician people truly want to see these days is Sarah Palin.
I suggest you start getting used to her...you're gonna see her a lot over the next 12 years.
It's going to be a tough 12 years for the closeted woman hating gay male voting block. You guys know who you are...
Are you saying he won't?Obama pulled about 29-30 million viewers....you better hope he gets a substantially better viewer to voter ratio than Perot got.
I don't know...let's give him the 19 million that tuned in for the WS as well...
That's put him about 49 million...that's about what I expect him to get.
So your answer is his ratio will be better than Perot's.
Thanks.
Yeah but I expected him to pull 50 million viewers as well...
So you were wrong.
Happens all the time.
Right I was wrong...there was even less interest in Obama than I expected.
But I don't get your point..
I said you better hope he gets a better viewer to voter ratio...that's not a statement on how many votes I personally think he will get as you seem to have concluded.
I then compared Perot's viewers to the number of votes he got and there is nothing to indicate I was wrong to do so...as there's not really any other compairon's to draw, and there was a pretty direct correlation.
I then pointed out how many votes I think Obama will get, which incidentally coincides with about how many viewers I thought he would get....I overestimated his viewing totals and by all previous evidence I have likely overestimated his vote totals as well.
Right.
You were wrong.
Then you were wrong again.
Then you said you were wrong.
Then you said you will be wrong again.
What was I wrong about?
Ah, the amnesia defense.
Well played
I thought it was funny...
In any case your entire purpose in this thread seems to be to tell me I am wrong, which is something I never doubted and in fact was quite happy to point out myself, and that means that
A. Your participation in this thread is pretty much not needed at all. Since I am capable of pointing out my own error and in fact have done so several times.
B. Your claim that I decieve myself is both and untrue and a clear case of self delusion on your part.
Why 12 years? Is she gonna run for president in 2020 and then lose in 2024?I can explain this...he only pulled about 8-9 million more viewers than Perot did in 1992, Perot pulled about 20 million viewers and incidentally...that coincided just about perfectly with the 19 million votes he got.
Obama pulled about 29-30 million viewers....you better hope he gets a substantially better viewer to voter ratio than Perot got.
Maybe if he had invited Palin to appear he'd have got some legitimate big viewing totals.
She pulls Superbowl ratings in primetime
Seriously...I expected 50-60 million people to watch this...he got about half that.
It's become pretty obvious that the only politician people truly want to see these days is Sarah Palin.
I suggest you start getting used to her...you're gonna see her a lot over the next 12 years.
It's going to be a tough 12 years for the closeted woman hating gay male voting block. You guys know who you are...
1 term as McCain VP, 2 terms as Pres.
Oh ok. So do you think she'll stage a coup or just change the policy in the senate so that McCain is only allowed one term?
You said you were wrong, then acted like you didn't.
You lied about it because your self-perceived e-rep is that fragile.
I thought it was funny...
Or, maybe, he just thinks McCain will only serve one term.
Oh ok. So do you think she'll stage a coup or just change the policy in the senate so that McCain is only allowed one term?
...or maybe you have no idea what a joke is
That's pretty much it...but even if he doesn't...
Sarah has a habit of going after in bents usually after a term...whether they are members of her party, or not.
Sincerely,
The Mayor of Alaska
The Governor of Alaska
The Head of the Republican Party of Alaska
S's why I'm saying Democrats should love her...she beats Republicans way better than they do.
You're joking right? You're not seriously suggesting she would attempt to run AGAINST McCain if he wins this year?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
