Here is my entire statement:
"NBA referees have proven themselves to be criminal, biased, selfish, and incompetent on many occasions. Obviously no referee will ever be 100% perfect, but these guys, and this league, aren't even close."
It is not 1) long-winded, 2) stupid, 3) a paragraph, 4) broad-sweeping, 5) an assumption.
The only t
hing you have "disproved" is your intelligence with your failure to understand that the plural "referees" relates to the plural "criminal, biased, selfish, and incompetent on many occasions".
Your faulty logic would also require that no other official had EVER committed ANY other criminal act.
