In a very small sample, Hill performed as well against upper echelon collegiate opponents as Chalmers or CDR did.
hill would have been picked up by the 35 pick
if spurs did not select him
boston won this year because of their d not because of their o
d has always won les latetly in the nba not the o rascal the sun lover
In a very small sample, Hill performed as well against upper echelon collegiate opponents as Chalmers or CDR did.
Sir, are you saying you know more about basketball talent than Celtics, Lakers, and SA. if you make this statement.. that is what your saying...
None of his statments are based on facts or observations. Its all comes from his midget rage.
rage much?
Objectivity = 2 for 29 = Sequspur
Subjectivity = a ray of sunshine and a hope that Hill can pick up the NBA game and actually contribute = the rest of you Poplickers.
Now who is objective?
Blow me.
Poplicking Poster Child to the Rescue.
you really are the biggest degenerate on the boards aren't you ... please go cheer for the suns.
This thread continues to waste our time.
But everyone keeps coming back!!!![]()
Hi... he torched your ass .. thanks
I must admit I had a few question marks early on, but I am now loving watching this kid take it to the haters. Bring on the ROY top 10
exactly.
indeed you degenerate little punk.
Are you really attempting to bump a thread? You? Really?![]()
Yup I am and read who on page 2 or 3 of this thread predicted great things for this kid.
geez...
SequSpur is really annoying and stupid
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)