Reply With Quote
Utterly Predictable forum.
WTC 7 CIA Field Office Records Exempt From Disclosure
Submitted by Aidan Monaghan on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 6:26am.
The following is a Freedom of Information Act response from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) regarding a request for records pertaining to a description of the functions of the CIA field office once located on the 25th floor of World Trade Center Building 7.
The CIA will neither confirm or deny the existence of such records per Executive Order 12958.
FEMA WTC 7 report reference to WTC 7 CIA field office:
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf
Dear Mr. Monaghan:
This is a final response to your 22 September 2008 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, received 1 October 2008 in the office ofthe Information and Privacy Coordinator, for "records that describe the functions ofthe CIA field office once located in World Trade Center Building 7 in New York City, New York or any other CIA records regarding this field office."
In accordance with section 3.6(a) of Executive Order 12958, as amended, the CIA can neither confirm nor deny the existence or nonexistence ofrecords responsive to your request. The fact of the existence or nonexistence ofrequested records is currently and properly classified and is intelligence sources and methods information that is protected from disclosure by section 6 of the CIA Act of 1949, as amended. Therefore, the Agency has denied your request pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(1) and (b)(3). I have enclosed an explanation of these exemptions for your reference and retention.
CIA Information and Privaey Coordinator Delores M. Nelson made this decision, which you may appeal to the Agency Release Panel, in my care, within 45 days from the date of this letter. Please include the basis of your appeal.
Sincerely,
Delores M. Nelson
Information and Privacy Coordinator
» Aidan Monaghan's blog
http://www.911blogger.com/node/18596
Utterly Predictable forum.
Do you just knee-jerk defend the government on every issue? I suggest you sit down and read about the Founding Fathers.
No, I knee-jerk declare the results of FOIA requests for information about CIA offices utterly predictable. The founding fathers have nothing at all to do with it.
The Founding Fathers, none of them, approved of government secrecy.
How do you get accurate info about the CIA then?
Untrue.
You don't -- until it's unclassified.How do you get accurate info about the CIA then?
Give me an example of a Founding Father promoting government secrecy? There aren't many.
The Cons utional convention was held in secret, but all the ratification debates were held in public, after special ratifying elections were held.
The Cons ution has several provisions in it for open government. The CIA has exceeded its authority.
Well, at least this thread deals with important topics pertinent to today's difficult economic and foreign policy situations.
Are you telling me that every communication and piece of information regarding foreign intelligence was public under the first few presidents?
They most certainly were not.
The duck goes quack.
Are you telling me that Bush was for open government and George Washington was not?
When it came to basic foreign intel, they were probably pretty like minded.
GW wasn't into false-flag military attacks. Nor did buildings fall down by themself in those days.
You have no proof that GWB was.Building collapsed due to fire quite a lot in those days.Nor did buildings fall down by themself in those days.
Who turned off all the fire alarms in WTC 7 at 6:47 AM? The CIA perhaps? No wonder they won't release anything.
The fire alarms were not turned off.
Quit lying.
They were. It is right in the NIST report. We have already been over this.
They were not turned off. It is right in the NIST report. We have already been over this but you continue to lie about it.
Who turned off the fire alrams? The entire alarm system was turned off by putting it on "test status" so no alarm messages went to the fire department, the police department, or to anyone.
It just so happened that this happened at 6:47 AM. Hmmm? How does this happen in a high security building, eh?
So it's nice that you admit that you lied about the fire alarms' being turned off the sentence immediately after you said the fire alarms were turned off.
Now you are lying about no alarm messages' being sent to the fire department. I'll wait for you to correct that yourself as well.
It happens when it is a routine occurrence in this building. Had you actually read the NIST report, you would know this. You must have lied about doing that as well.It just so happened that this happened at 6:47 AM. Hmmm? How does this happen in a high security building, eh?
The alarms were turned off. When the fires broke out, no alarms were sounded.
The alarm was not turned off. Why did you go back to lying about that?
Antiwar protesters vs. Twoofers
LMFAO at about 3:42 in this video. Listen to what the antiwar guy thinks about Loose Change.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
