Reply With Quote
Hill's is OK. However, it looks like Oberto, Bonner and KT have all "hit the wall". Oberto and KT have hit the age wall. Bonner the "no-talent" wall.
When Spurs pass on Chalmers and CDR on draft day, somehow I knew this is going to happen..what I didnt know was I thought Hill will play better than this....I think Pop should be excited Hill is available at 26 by now..whoever think Hill is diamond in a rough is either in denial or a person who try to practice affirmation over reality. We waste another pick which can be used to upgrade roster or additional package for trade bait.
Hill's is OK. However, it looks like Oberto, Bonner and KT have all "hit the wall". Oberto and KT have hit the age wall. Bonner the "no-talent" wall.
Bonner played well tonight WTF...
Hill looks better than both Chalmers and CDR..
Why do people post in sequ's threads? If you want him them to go away do not post.
Hill got 20 and the spurs get blown out at home. nice.
Perceptive.
GHill just made headlines on ST the other day that he can rebound, he can play QB(high 8 assts), and that he can SCORE
Bonner has played some of the best ball I've seen him play on the Spurs these last 4 games. Give Bonner some credit. I may rip into Bonner a lot, but I want to see him do well and help the Spurs.
KT and Oberto though have stunk it up.
Give the guy a break. He looks like a fine, gutsy, kid to me, and he will grow into a very able backup at the very least.
Oh, and what SenorSpur said.
PS Good to see Nene has grown into a decent player... porr bas has had so much bad luck, but I always liked him since he stood up to the US team at the Sydney Olympics.
Hit the wall? LOL
Sequspur is ST's version of Rodney Dangerfield, only shorter and not as good looking
And not as funny.
And not as respected.
Until CDR actually plays more than 10 minutes at least, we will never know if he's better than george hill... translating college stats to NBA stats is inaccurate. As for Mario Chalmers, just look at the stats of this guy:
Average minutes per game:
Hill: 22:48 minutes
Chalmers: 29:48 minutes
Stats (Avg):
Hill: 8.7 points, 3.0 rebounds, 3.0 assists
Chalmers: 7.3 points, 2.8 rebounds, 4.8 assists
If george hill was actually given more time on the court and doesn't get yanked by pop I am pretty damn sure he'll produce even better stats that will trump chalmers
nice, thanks for looking that up. im liking what i see from a statistical standpoint.
Hill is doing more than OK so far.
Did anyone already point out that he doing very well in home games and not so well in road ones?
That the 8 ppg is really split in 13 and 3, respectively?
It's just a matter of confidence, coming from a team with low level basketball.
He will improve and will be a significant addition.
dude plays like he is scared. time to move on.
what a hater
whoever made this thread, look at george hill's statline tonight against the jazz and the number of minutes he played...
He created another thread to kiss Hills ass. lol
I don't kiss anyone's ass pinoy
Quoted For Suck.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
