Reply With Quote
You are not agree with the tax break?
lol at chump for assuming I am agree with the tax breakOh, and@ board Republicans getting angry about a Democrat's keeping tax cuts in place.
he promises stuff and lies to get in
I have a problem with his forked tongue more then anything
2 months ago he said the opposite
what will he say in 2 months
You are not agree with the tax break?
Says...you? Point out ONE thing I ed about. I'm just making statements.
The building was on fire before he inherited it. And what he promised to help put out the fire was never going to work...now you want to pretend like he didn't know the flame was already going? C'mon...if it isn't a good idea now, it wasn't a good idea then.
I can't believe how hard it is for some people to admit this guy used misleading campaign promises. Just once tell me he doesn't walk on water, and that he's a politician like the rest of them.
You're kidding, right?
Go ahead and . It's allowed. Lying about your ing just makes it funny.
I've never made anything resembling that claim, and have argued against those that do. Still, I find it to be a pointless, disingenuous critique. But, yes, most sensible Obama supporters agree that he will fall short of utopian perfection... agreed.
Every person that runs for president is a politician. It's inescapably in the job description. Washington, Madison, Lincoln... no one is excluded. I find it ridiculous when anyone tries to run for political office as a non-politician. It's like saying someone will dominate the nba... but he won't be a basketball player.
Not as funny as you ing about my ing, but okay.
Obama doesn't walk on water and he is a politician like the rest of them.
Anything more you want to about?
I am just making statements about your ing.
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you...!
For what it's worth, I'm not ing about Obama. I'm ing about Obamaniacs who will support Obama no matter what, even if he governs as Barack W. Bush.
I think--or I hope--that Obama is scared enough and smart enough to realize that his re-election depends on largely maintaining the status quo. If the economy really is in the ter, then any drastic changes implemented by Obama and the Democrats will become the cause of our nation's problems--according to stupid, disgruntled voters.
I can already sense a Clintonian inclination toward triangulation and a poll-driven presidency. While such a governing philosophy is anything but courageous or admirable, I definitely prefer it to hard left ideology.
nevermind
He's doing what he has to do.
What's new. Every democrat does just that!
Today's democrats cannot get elected without lying to their lemmings.
Do you board Republicans favor this course of action by Obama?
Yes or no.
Yeah, I'll admit that I'm at a loss to truly understand what the story is here. While the fundamentals of the declining economy perhaps haven't changed much since 11/4, the particulars have certainly been in flux and the tombstones from the decline are increasing. With that, it's a worthwhile effort to reconsider policies that might not best serve the public. I'd frankly much rather a President who will backtrack on a position to find a good outcome from reasoned analysis than one who insists upon maintaining a particular approach, no matter how much failure it appears destined to bring. One is pragmatic, the other is insane.
Here, the only people who would seem inclined to be bothered by reconsideration are those who seem interested in seeing failure from Obama, and, as Chump seems to be saying, the irony is that those who are bothered are the very people who would have advocated for this stance in the first place -- after all, it's among the things that McCain promised.
Seems to me that Obama cares more about saving what's left of our battered economy than what some in the GOP will think about him...truth be told it was Dubya who should have raised taxes years ago...
If you Dems were expecting him to keep all his promises he made during his campaign y'all are going to spend the next four years having a meltdown
I'm glad he got a clue, I guess I'm just skeptical that he actually got one or if it's just the first of many promises made to the electorate to sucker them into voting for him.Here, the only people who would seem inclined to be bothered by reconsideration are those who seem interested in seeing failure from Obama, and, as Chump seems to be saying, the irony is that those who are bothered are the very people who would have advocated for this stance in the first place -- after all, it's among the things that McCain promised.
Time will tell.
I still remember when Bush took office in 2000 and some republicans said the deficit would be eliminated by 2010. Too bad Bush never got a clue.
Also still remember republicans saying the deficit would balloon and the stock market would suffer with Clinton as president.
Suckers, indeed.
So far so good from barack.
Whats funny though is saying "tax increases" are good, but then turns around and doesn't do it.
Whatever though, glad hes governing from the center.
If he does what Clinton did second term, cut spending, then the budget should be fine.
That is until the next unnecessary stupidass bailout.
This will be fun to watch. After melting down for 8 years, think they can survive another four?If you Dems were expecting him to keep all his promises he made during his campaign y'all are going to spend the next four years having a meltdown
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
