Reply With Quote
Certainly, your only interest is discussing me.
Thanks for your attention.
whottt is such an idiot.
The only idiots in this thread are those that think I have the slightest bit of interest in discussing citicorp...
Certainly, your only interest is discussing me.
Thanks for your attention.
The federal government is giving them $300 billion. That's bound to help the stock price.
Irrelevant.
You asked if there is something positive to be said about Citi's performance and I pointed out how Citi's stock performance was damn positive.
If you invisted $1MM in Citi stock last week, today you'd have approx $2.5MM.
Pretty sweet if you ask me . . .
Not irrelevant. That stock e speaks not at all to Citi's performance, just their luck at being bailed out. Their actual performance, as a company, has been less than piss poor.
Irrelevant.
I asked whottt for something positive.
You are not whottt.
I'm sure he thanks you for leaping to his defense.
Oh wait, he told you to suck a .
thsi my friend invests in gold already
i shouldve jump on the bandwagon
when did $30 turn into $300?
An extra zero got into Schiff's blog. I should have known better.
http://caps.fool.com/blogs/viewpost....20523245711617
One measurement of a company's performance is the value of its stock. Citi's more than doubled in a weeks time. The reason why it doubled is irrelevant if the ask was to find something positive to say about Citi.
Go ask the people who bought Citi at $3 and sold it at $8 if they have something positive to say.
I know the answer, do you?
Somebody answering a question that was not directed at them. Probably the first time it happens at ST.Irrelevant.
I asked whottt for something positive.
You are not whottt.
I'm sure he thanks you for leaping to his defense.
Oh wait, he told you to suck a .
Great comeback, idiot
Somebody answering a question that was not directed to them. Probably the first time it happens at ST.
Great comeback, idiot
Wow, you sure are taking the internets seriously this week.
Defending Citigroup's performance and whottt's honor.
I know he needs help because he's that stupid, it's just hilarious that it's you who wants to rescue him.
Wow, you sure are taking the internets seriously this week.
As seriously as you.
Defending Citigroup's performance
I'm simply pointing out a fact which contradicts what you said. I know it is hard for you to admit it. 5 years posting here have taught me it's a rare even when you admit you are wrong about something.
It's also a rare event when you don't try hard to have the last word. Even when you are proven wrong.
and whottt's honor.
Wrong again. I could care less about whottt's honor.
I know he needs help because he's that stupid, it's just hilarious that it's you who wants to rescue him.
You think I was trying to "rescue" him? From what?
I simply pointed out a a positive thing about Citi's performance (among all the ty things that can be said about that company) at a point in time when you asked for one. That is all I did.
But you had to make a comment about how the stock e had to do with a $30B government guarantee, an irrelevant comment given that the e in the stock price really existed, which is in itself a positive event regardless of what caused it. Again, ask the guys who bought Citi at $3 how "positive" they are feeling right about now?
Chump...please don't use smack I run at other posters to benefit yourself in this thread.
smeagol, please disregard Chump's usage of my go suck a comment.
I'm not defending Citibank's performance. I'm simply defending one aspect of its performance, the value of its stock since it hit the bottom.
It is an easy aspect to defend.
Yeah, I know you don't like it when you are exposed as the idiot you are. Tough .
Right, you have to suck his now.smeagol, please disregard Chump's usage of my go suck a comment.
But he's already sucking your , so you got what you wanted out of it.
Whom did I ask again? Oh yeah, not you, dumbass. You clearly don't understand what goes on here. Your agenda is now to save whottt so he'll suck your . That's your business. Mission accomplished.I simply pointed out a a positive thing about Citi's performance (among all the ty things that can be said about that company) at a point in time when you asked for one. That is all I did.
They're thanking God that the government gave them $30 billion to cover for their lousy performance.But you had to make a comment about how the stock e had to do with a $30B government guarantee, an irrelevant comment given that the e in the stock price really existed, which is in itself a positive event regardless of what caused it. Again, ask the guys who bought Citi at $3 how "positive" they are feeling right about now?
RIF
Whom did I ask again? Oh yeah, not you, dumbass.
Since when do I need your permission to make a comment in the Political Forum?
Look idiot, you were wrong, there is something positive to say about Citi, and that is its stock performance over the last 10 days. Get over it.
You clearly don't understand what goes on here.
You do?
Your agenda is now to save whottt so he'll suck your .
He said "Go suck a ", not "I will suck your ".
You're dumb as a brick wall.
And they are 150% richer by investing in Citibank's stock.They're thanking God that the government gave them $30 billion to cover for their lousy performance.
You wish you'd been that smart, but you're not.
You don't, otherwise you wouldn't have answered a question that wasn't directed to you, dumbass.
You don't get it. I understand.Since when do I need your permission to make a comment in the Political Forum?
Look idiot, you were wrong, there is something positive to say about Citi, and that is its stock performance over the last 10 days. Get over it.You really are racking up the fail here.
Yes, I understand perfectly what my conversation with whottt was, You didn't and still don't.
You do?
He said "Go suck a ", not "I will suck your ".
You're dumb as a brick wall.
I don't have my money in stocks. For the year, that makes me quite smart enough, thank you. Sounds to me like you lost money this year. I didn't.And they are 150% richer by investing in Citibank's stock.
You wish you wuould've bees that smart, but you're not.
i think it's great that americans get to bail out these stained corporations and people think it's great.
From post #38 of this thread:You don't, otherwise you wouldn't have answered a question that wasn't directed to you, dumbass.
You don't get it. I understand.
Yes, I understand perfectly what my conversation with whottt was, You didn't and still don't.
I don't have my money in stocks. For the year, that makes me quite smart enough, thank you. Sounds to me like you lost money this year. I didn't.
Case closed.
So you did lose money this year. I understand why you're so pissy.
Anyway, if you still can't figure out why I specifically asked whottt what he specifically liked about Citigroup, you have even more problems.
It's a message board, asshole.
It's clear you lost given these kinds of lame responses.You don't get it. I understand.
Yes, I understand perfectly what my conversation with whottt was, You didn't and still don't.
If you wanted to have a private conversation, use the PM function.
Says the brain who coined the phrase "Hedo > Manu"
I don't have my money in stocks. For the year, that makes me quite smart enough, thank you. Sounds to me like you lost money this year. I didn't.
Saying "quite smart enough" doesn't make you smart.
The money I had lost, I have made it back through the course of November.
You still don't get it.
It's a message board, asshole.
Not at all. You just ruined what could have been a fun exchange with whottt.It's clear you lost given these kinds of lame responses.
So now you're the boss here. Hypocrite.If you wanted to have a private conversation, use the PM function.
Hey, how did your wife do in that "Who would you rather " internets photo contest you entered her in? That was smart and classy.Say the brain who coined the phrase "Hedo > Manu"
Keeping my money out of the stocks proves I was smart. I'm no day trader, so I have to call the overall strategy a smart one.Saying "quite smart enough" doesn't make you smart.
Did you buy Citigroup last week?The money I had lost, I have made it back through the course of November.
I did not. Actually, I'm making money as we speak.
My only "problem" is arguing with you about stuff you are clueless. I guess I will leave whottt continue the job of exposing you ignorant ass.Anyway, if you still can't figure out why I specifically asked whottt what he specifically liked about Citigroup, you have even more problems.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
