Reply With Quote
Makes sense if you aren't insane.
WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng
The 9/11 hoax is falling apart at free-fall speed, like a house of cards!
Makes sense if you aren't insane.
That's why NIST believes it.
I'm just curious:
At what acceleration should a collapsing building fall?
At Moon's gravity? LOL
I would think that a collapsing structure (on Earth -- let's be clear) would fall somewhere near a rate of 32.2 feet/sec/sec.
Next.
A rigid steel-framed building would not fall, whether here on earth, or on the Moon.
Things made of steel fail all the time. When they fail, they often fall. I know -- I'm a mechanical engineer.
I guess that steel bridge in Minnesota didn't fall either.
It was another controlled demolition by Bush and Cheney. But the idiots forgot to fly the fake planes into it this time.
Sincerely,
Nbadan and Galileo
The bridge was not steel-framed, it was steel reinforced concrete.
It's so easy to catch you lying.
No, it was a steel bridge with a concrete roadbed.
Well, but Galileo did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
Oh well...game over for us then.
It's so easy to catch you lying.
But did it turn into powder?
Did it fall the equivalent of 110 stories with 110 stories worth of building on top of it?
And, that bridge fell because of a structural failure in the steel, not any concrete components.
The first five floors of the WTC didn't have far to fall why would there be no desks, or any other items? You guys find any reason you can to steer clear form the truth.
A bridge and a Steel framed building = apples and oranges.And, that bridge fell because of a structural failure in the steel, not any concrete components.
Well, besides the fact they did find alot of office equipment in the debris, most of it was obliterated by the other 105 floors worth of building that came down on top of it.
More like apples and pears but, they both grow on trees.
Show me some pics of all this office debris they found.
Then where is the office furniture of the top floors since they didn't have anything above them? You guys say it's called the pancake theory then much of the debris would be trapped between floors.most of it was obliterated by the other 105 floors worth of building that came down on top of it.
And your 105 floors theory will not work on Building 7 so come up with another excuse.
But ignorant white people only pick what they can reach.More like apples and pears but, they both grow on trees.
Do you guys just make up?
You think the WTC just turned into a giant pile of tal powder? I guess that's why it took so long to escavate and haul all of that debris out of there.
A bunch of photos of debris removed from WTC can be seen on this website.
(I'm sure there are many others)
http://redeye.chicagotribune.com/new...llery?index=35
Where are the desk ,chairs, and computers? All I saw was you see after a bomb went off. Did you even look at the link you posted?
And, if you saw an office building, after a bomb went off, you'd find desks, chairs, and computers.
I have come to the conclusion that Yonnie,Chump,and all his glue sniffing pals really don't want the truth, they just want to disagree with people.
it does kind of make sense, considering the weight of the building would have no effect on it's collapse, because gravity doesn't exist above the 40th floor.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
