Reply With Quote
Looking back, Tech fans, do you now see how it would have been silly for him to be standing there with the other three? With the final votes being revealed, it would have been an embarassment for Graham to be there.
lol 213 heisman points
and tech s think that he deserved to be there... LMAO
Looking back, Tech fans, do you now see how it would have been silly for him to be standing there with the other three? With the final votes being revealed, it would have been an embarassment for Graham to be there.
Damn. 213? If I were Harrell, I'm really, really glad I wasn't invited. If I'm Crabtree, I'm really, really pissed.
stretch dooshbag thread #521,200
at the end of the day, you either win it or you don't. Harrell would still take that invitation if they asked him to come.
Ten years from now, nobody will remember the vote tally except for you insecure Tech bashers that are so afraid of the size of their willies that you have to keep pulling it out to make sure it's still there.
How is it that Tebow has the most first place votes but doesn't win? Makes no sense. They should say "just write down one guy".
oh ok. Harrell should be glad he wasn't invited, but even though Crab had no shot either, he should be pissed? Great logic, Kermie.
Crabtree won the Biletnikoff and will be selected higher in the draft than any one of those guys, so he'll have the ultimate scoreboard any way.
Being selected higher doesn't mean scoreboard in anyways. Success is how you get the scoreboard. Right now, Bradford, McCoy, and Tebow all by far have the scoreboard.
that's like saying Danny Weurffel has scoreboard.
Youre a tool.
He obviously didn't deserve an invitation since he was so ridiculously far behind in voting.
If that's the case, then why were you guys crying like es about him not getting invited?
Because it's a point total system, dumb .
No, its more like saying Tom Brady has scoreboard on all the QB's taken higher than him.
i had a better chance of winning the heisman than harrell
no, he deserved to go because of the season he and the Raiders had, regardless of how the voting went.
you're a homer d-bag for statingt otherwise and for starting these d-bag threads over and over and over and over again.
what? He deserves to go. Why do you keep starting d-bag threads on this topic unless you have to keep checking the mirror to make sure your shlong is still there?If that's the case, then why were you guys crying like es about him not getting invited?
I know what it is and it's stupid.Because it's a point total system, dumb .
Of course, I'm sure your forrest gump ass thinks it's a great system.
Just keep on laughing your ass off like some kind of re ed hyena.
yes he does.
moron.
nyahahhha nyhahahaha. hilarious. My dog has a better chance at joining mensa than you.
Goddammit you . Crabtree was the BEST ING PLAYER IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL PERIOD CAN YOU HEAR ME SCREAMING AT YOU MORON!!!!!!! Yes, he should be pissed that he was left off the ballot. It's great logic. The best player should be pissed off when he isn't recognized as such.
The thing was... OU, UT, and Florida all had better and more successful seasons. That's probably a big reason why they got an added nod.
lol, 213
lol, harrell
lol, tech
lol, butthurt
lol, hypocritical crybaby
I don't have a problem with the system. Fact is, its all human voting, so of course some homerism and other such factors will come into play. The point system can help combat that.
I have a bigger problem with the system that determines things that matter more... the BCS. There should be a playoff system. That way, other good teams (like UT, USC, and Tech) all get another chance to show whether they deserve to be in the championship game or not, as opposed to teams that get a higher ranking just because they run up the score on games they already have won and that their opponent gave up on, like Florida and OU.
I think you take some of what I say a little too seriously dude. It's nothing but jokes from me when I bash on tech like I do. I thought you would have figured it out by now.
that was my point. success means more than where you get drafted. crabtree can get drafted before those guys, but that doesnt mean "scoreboard" or whatever you want to call it. if he sucks, then its even more embarassing because he was expected to be good. as opposed to a late pick sucking, because no one expected them to be good.
so he's the best player because you're screaming that he's the best player? Who the do you think you are that you know more than the voters?
The voters got it right, but that's not to say that both Harrell and Crabtree didn't deserve to go.
the dooshness in this thread is overpowering.
of course you don't. If you did, then you would look like an even bigger idiot than you already are.
I don't really care if you are serious or joking. You are a jackass either way.I think you take some of what I say a little too seriously dude. It's nothing but jokes from me when I bash on tech like I do. I thought you would have figured it out by now.
The voters are and always have been, ing re ed. The whole Heisman concept of offense only is re ed. See many of the Heisman winners from the last two decades. Crabtree deserved to go. I think I've established my argument that Harrell is a system quarterback and what made that Tech team special was Crabtree. He is in my opinion the best player regardless of position in college football.
so he's the best player because you're screaming that he's the best player? Who the do you think you are that you know more than the voters?
The voters got it right, but that's not to say that both Harrell and Crabtree didn't deserve to go.
the dooshness in this thread is overpowering.
Wait, if the voters got it right, why the would those two deserve to go? Dude, you ing contradict yourself with every sentence. Sometimes I tell myself your stupidity comes from your Tech education, considering that you actually went there. Then I read posts from FWDT and I'm reminded that Tech isn't the problem.
wtf?
lol, sensitive
X 1043902483249023
Well then why do McCoy and Tebow deserve to go if they know they already lost? Why invite just three? Theyve invited 5 before, so there's really no big deal inviting 5 again.
If those system QBs that you are talking about like Weurfell, Toretta, Weinke etc deserved to go, then once again, you Plaxicoed yourself. By that argument Harrell has every right to be there.
If you think your logic works, then you are an even bigger moron than stretch. , you may be the same guy for all I know.
no surprise you dont get it.
beh.lol, sensitive
, I'm probably talking with the same types of bandwagon homers that didn't even go to UT or A&M......
it would figure as much.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
