Reply With Quote
At this point, it would take Parker+Ginobili in order to get Chris Bosh.
Parker or Ginobili for Chris Bosh?
At this point, it would take Parker+Ginobili in order to get Chris Bosh.
Maybe....
I will trade Ginobili for Chris Bosh, yes!
Ginobili for Aldridge and Webster -- get it done. One time.
I would prefer Aldridge plus Batum. That is just me.
I'm sure you would, but why would they give up 2 starters?
Noez.
Well, the Blazers are clogged in their SF rotation. Batum is an unproven rookie. Blazers get Ginobili/Parker. They would prefer Parker so they have to throw in a filler. It is equal value. You don't say no when a GM comes and offer you Ginobili/Parker for two other non all stars. Aldridge is a 2nd option, is he?
Batum is not even 3rd option. Blazers get a veteran/scorer while we fill our needs at SF and Big man wise.
Chris Bosh is one heck of a player. How about Ginobili and Matt Bonner to Toronto? That would be too funny sending Bonner back to Toronto!
We keep Bonner in San Antonio and send them Udoka and Vaughn. They need depth at the Wings so they will accept this ripoff of a trade.Chris Bosh is one heck of a player. How about Ginobili and Matt Bonner to Toronto? That would be too funny sending Bonner back to Toronto!
It would be so much more fun sending Bonner back up north.I would love to see his face when Pop informs him of the trade!
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...8~24&te=&cash=
The trade result of the Raptors and the Spurs. I find the ESPN trade machine quite ridiculous but it is one of the better ones around.
Would you trade Hill for Batum?
Nope, if Jacque Vaughn is our 2nd string PG, I would throw slippers at the Spurs GM.
I like Hill. Pop needs to play Parker less and Hill more, at least this early in the season and with Tony not 100% with his ankle. Hill plays great defense, Tony not so much at the moment.
Also one thing I think is bringing the Spurs down is their reliance on the 3 point shot. Attack the rim! Slam it down! Quit with the constant 3's!!!
I agree with you. TP is our point guard and we definitely need him. With development of Mason and Hill and Ginobili is not getting any younger, it will make sense to get Bosh. This will work for Raptors since they already got O Neal and need experienced all star like Ginobili to run the floor and make serius impact. In Spurs side, DUncan and Bosh will a lil bit remind us of twin tower thing..only this time Duncan is the mentor. This will also create healthy compe ion for Ian and give him opportunity to play even better because Im tired of KT. No disrespect but honestly he is getting old and all he does is just fouling and rebound once in a while, he even lost his middle jumper. Coach Chip cannot make his knees any faster.
The Spurs would be out-of-their-minds lucky to get Aldridge for Ginobili.
I was actually referring more to Parker. No way they take Ginobili cause of Brandon Roy. For the Toronto situation, Ginobili would be a better fit. For the blazers, Parker would be better, but I would want Bayless or Blake thrown in to sweeten the deal.
oh...wow. here's an idea...you are a ing idiot. shut the up...stupid .
ok ok, maybe i overreacted. but this is a stupid ing question...i dislike most spurs' fans.
It is all just plain objective point of view. If it makes the Spurs a better team, the front office should do it. If they decide to throw Kapono's salary to the Spurs on this type of deal, the front office should hang up on the phone immediately.
Never seen that ESPN trade machine before. Interesting.
It only accounts for salary, not team needs. It pretty much is useless unless you know what the other team needs.
I can't believe toronto can trade Bosh only for Parker or Manu.They would be very stupid.But I would trade Parker+Manu for Bosh+Calderon if they want.We could have our franchise player when Duncan retires and we could have a great team to win this year with these twin towers.
Calderon-Mason-Finley-Bosh-Duncan .
And of course Bosh could learn a lot with TD as teammate like TD learned from Robinson.
They would want Ginobili for the 3 spot. He can easily play the 3 with bigs like Oden and Pryzbilla down low. Or he could come off of the bench like he does with the Spurs. They already have Blake at point guard, and Blake isn't a backup point. He's a really underrated player. Solid defender, takes care of the ball like his life depended on it, and makes all of the right passes. Anyway, I don't see them wanting Parker, even if Parker is the more valuable trading piece.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
