Reply With Quote
answer the question please.
If we had a discussion where it was clearly stated that I thought Hill would not see more than normal minutes, yes it would be acceptable to assume when you talk to me and say no minutes that I would use my brain and understand what you mean by it.
answer the question please.
I don't assume when the person I'm arguing with constantly lies and goes back and changes the meaning of his words mid thread.
Yes, I said the matchups would indicate that KT would not get extended minutes. The equation obviously changed when Oberto came up lame.
You are the one being dishonest, not me. You keep quoting only little parts and then acting like you do not understand how some can think that the person they are talking to understands things without having to use flash-cards to help illustrate.
Yes, I said the matchups would indicate that KT would not get extended minutes. The equation obviously changed when Oberto came up lame.
Did I not say that KT would see time against the Wolves and Raps?
DPG, for the good of the thread, drop it
You've lost, get over it. When TIMVP is right, just accept it. Trust me, I've argued with him in the past and have learned, if takes over 3 posts to explain something to you, your wrong.
How am I wrong???? I said KT would get minutes against the Raps and Wolves because he is healthy and can do well. Oberto got hurt so he got the minutes anyways, but since he did so well it leads me to believe that 1) he is healthy and 2) he would be taking some of the normal rotational minutes from Oberto even if he is healthy.DPG, for the good of the thread, drop it
You've lost, get over it. When TIMVP is right, just accept it. Trust me, I've argued with him in the past and have learned, if takes over 3 posts to explain something to you, your wrong.
His shooting really helps and so does his rebounding. How does this make me wrong?
I give up. I can't argue with someone who calls scoreboard on 18 minutes being classified as extended playing time and who also calls scoreboard for KT playing more with Oberto was out. Especially since said person had already retracted his scoreboard claims during the same thread.
Congrats you win perhaps the most jumbled argument I've ever read. Amazing job changing the meaning of "not playing" and "will not play" to somehow reference extended minutes. Well done, especially since it took you a couple pages to make that switch
P.S.
Quick, claim that KT is going to play more minutes next game than Oberto. You have a good chance because Oberto will not play due to injury. And when I say will not play, I mean he won't play. As in his minutes will not be measurable because there will be none.
I guess we will just have to see when Oberto is fully healthy along with Kurt who Pop goes with in certain situations. I just think that Kurt is better for the Spurs in most situations.
Congrats you win perhaps the most jumbled argument I've ever read. Amazing job changing the meaning of "not playing" and "will not play" to somehow reference extended minutes. Well done, especially since it took you a couple pages to make that switch
P.S.
Quick, claim that KT is going to play more minutes next game than Oberto. You have a good chance because Oberto will not play due to injury. And when I say will not play, I mean you won't play. As in his minutes will not be measurable because there will be none.
Why do you try and take away from what I am saying by making dishonest claims. The minutes part is part of it (although you act like I threw 18 minutes in your face as certified proof that I no doubt won the argument), but we were talking effectiveness. KT has been effective in games where Oberto has normally gotten the minutes.
I does not matter if Oberto is hurt. Look at how KT is playing in the games. If he would of sucked ass against the Raps, then I would of said you were 100% right. But he did well which leads me to believe that he can take some minutes from Oberto even when he is healthy in the situations we discussed.
*sigh*
No we were talking minutes. I never talked about KT's effectiveness.
Minutes. Not effectiveness.
For the thousandth time.
If KT was effective, why then would he not get the minutes?
I can only explain that Oberto usually plays against perimeter bigs 20 times per thread. I've reached my limit.
You win. Congrats.
LOL, the thing is I completely get what you are saying, I am just disagreeing with it. Maybe I just really suck at explaining what I think?
I can only explain that Oberto usually plays against perimeter bigs 20 times per thread. I've reached my limit.
You win. Congrats.
I know that Oberto usually gets the minutes against the perimeter bigs. My thinking was that this is KT's first full year, he is fully healthy and his tools will allow him to take some of those minutes from Oberto in certain situations. Like the Wolves/Raps. That is all. *handshake*
Washed-up has-been living on a reptation as the best and hardest-working player on a bad Knicks team.
He hasn't been on the Knicks since 2005. David Robinson said18 months ago KT defended Duncan just as good as or better than anyone else he has seen. I don't think David Robinson would say that about a washed up has been. Just because he doesn't put up great numbers doesn't mean he is a has been, when he and Timmy are on the floor they never give up offensive rebounds.
If the Suns still had KT last year and Duncan had to defend Shaq, Suns win that series. If the Suns don't have KT in 2007, the Spurs sweep that series. KT makes a big impact. When you see him frustrate Bynum this year you'll know why I said that.
now, now kids. can't we play nice?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
