Reply With Quote
You guys lost to the Kings, the Pacers, the Heat, and almost lost to the Knicks.
Wow, that is pathetic.
Double OT to beat the Grizzlies AT HOME. And just LOST to the Bucks AT HOME.
Give me a break. The Spurs are not contenders.
You guys lost to the Kings, the Pacers, the Heat, and almost lost to the Knicks.
Wow, that is pathetic.
Bogut > Duncan, its pretty obvious thats the trend here
25-5.
Even good teams will drop some games every now and then.
Needing a miracle shot to beat the Suns, barely beating the Grizz in double OT, and losing to the lowly Bucks at home. That's not an anomaly, it's a trend. The Spurs aren't that good.
Ok, that I agree.Bogut > Duncan, its pretty obvious thats the trend here
Check the Suns schedule before the Spurs game first. The Grizz game. Well, ok. The Bucks have a record of 14-17 coming into this game. Which is far better than the Kings.
And even good teams will drop some games every now and then.
seems to be. crap.Bogut > Duncan, its pretty obvious thats the trend here
The Lakers will not win the NBA le...again. Book it.
That phrase has a bad reputation around here.
Games are 48 minutes long...once the clock runs out, whichever team has more points, wins. That could be 1 point or 12 points or 20 points. Good teams have more points than the other team at the end of 48 minutes. Doesn't matter if its 1 or 12 or 20. A team could win by 1 point 82 times, and still be 82-0 at the end of the season.
If there are overtimes, it doesn't mean that a team isn't good. It just means they needed more time to score more than the other team.
25-5, but the Lakers had a ridiculous 11 of 15 at Staples to open the season. It'll even out. The Lakers this year are expected to be about 50-32 or so.
yes they do...for tonight.
Happy new year!
The Spurs are just not a good team.
This thread isn't about the Lakers. It's how the Spurs suck A$S
But doesn't this run counter to your whole theory on "making some shots" and "getting lucky". If a game is decided by few points, even in the Spurs favor, why shouldn't the other team just say the Spurs got lucky.
I don't know SD, you should rethink your arguments here, your game has been weak this season.
look how dumb you are
Anyways:
Spurs will finish much closer to 50-32 than the Lakers do, barring major injury.
Analingus seems to be hip these days.
Well, I hope they wash thoroughly beforehand.
The Bucks got that voodo working against the Spurrrss.
hey at least the spurs dont choke ha
Oh my, that's all you've got ???????????????
I was very miserable to see the spurs lose to bucks, but it's just a common game of the regular season. the rockets were beaten by wizards several days ago, even the celtics can be beaten by lakers and hornets have been beaten by bobcats this season, does that mean all these teams are not contenders?
Bucks beat spurs and wizards beat rockets, then bucks are gonna appear in the playoffs in place of spurs and wizards take place of rockets. It's not winORgohome game, it's just a regular season game that is not quite different from any other 81 game. No team can stay lossless throughout all the 82 games, I would rather to lose to such weak teams than lose to our rivals.
didn't the celtics beat yalls ass in the finals last june
the mavs will finish 32-50
SPURSOWNTEXAS is the new SD. We all though RSX was gonna be the answer, but this SOT character has a lot of potential
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
