I'm perfectly OK with that. Utah should be #1, no matter who wins the national championship game.![]()
I'm perfectly OK with that. Utah should be #1, no matter who wins the national championship game.![]()
Utah had a of a year and I give them props. I am a Gators fan so I hope they can go out and handle their business and show they deserve to be up where they are. Utah might finish #1 AP, no problems there as long as FLA handles their business and goes out and beats Oklahoma.
BTW the BCS won't die, keep wishing like I do every damn year to no avail. The fans want it, almost all of us.
I agree but they should have the chance to prove it. People thought Bama would smoke them and look what happened. I think SC kills them but hey, stranger things have happened.
I think FLA would beat them too, Florida is better than Bama and proved it (Without the great Harvin out there). USC and FLA are the two best IMO, but then again playoff is needed to prove who is the best.
The same USC that got smoked by Oregon State, who in turn got smoked by Utah?
Alabama was saying that yesterday, too.![]()
My point exactly. If USC had stepped it up and beat Oregon St., they wouldn't be worrying about not being in the big game. Utah didn't lose to anyone.
So Utah should be playing against my Gators next week![]()
1. Oregon State beat Utah fair and square...the refs had other plans
2. penn state killed Oregon State
3. USC didn't get smoked by Oregon State
...your argument doesn't hold water.
Yup, to Ole Miss.....our friends in Lubbock saw them up close and personal today.![]()
What's the point of classifying these teams in the same division when half the teams are precluded from making the BCS CG before the season starts?
My ass they did. Look at the ing replay. It was clearly pass interference.
why does everyone say a playoff will magically determine who is best? how many times in any sport, pro or otherwise, has a better team been beaten by a lesser team? more than i can count.
i'm not saying playoffs wouldnt be better, but lets say it was a playoff system....and utah won. would everone agree they're the best team. no they wouldnt. and neither would anyone if texas won, or tech, or florida and so on.....
again, playoffs wold be better, but to say "a best" team will be determind bc of it is stupid
Yeah fans of Texas on here were telling me TT could beat FLA and so on.... They always used the ole miss excuse to down me or FLA fans in here like it was horrible to lose to them, turns out they are not so bad after all. Ole Miss was a good team.
YEP that happens except in 7 game series, then the better team USUALLY WINS, thats the time you usually see the best team win it all barring injuries or horrible calls in a few games, even then you gotta lose 4. I agree with what you said though.
I didn't think Bama would smoke them especially without their best player. SC, however, would trash them.
Andre Smith would have changed this game a lot.
What heads who argue fail to realize, yet Utah players and their fans and so on who say they were the best..... Okay FLA beat them by three less points, okay! They were fully healthy with all their guns and FLA missed 25% of their O with Harvin, and he is wrth AT LEAST 7 points a game! Harvin not out there and their team at full strength and they stilll win it. I mean you can argue that all day, but seriously what I said is 100% truth and nobody can argue that, period.
So the New York Giants werent the best team in pro football last year? Kansas wasnt the best NCAA basketball team? Is that whay you are saying?
![]()
any loss ao home in collage is a bad loss
what we have now is far better then what it use to be like.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)