Reply With Quote
No thanks, unless the Raptors are dying to just give him away. Was compared to Dirk before he was drafted, but looks more like Dirk-lite. Disappears in big games. Bonner brings much of the same and the Spurs don't have to give up anything for him.
He's not as good as the Raptors hoped he would be but he's still a former #1 pick. If we can get him for anyone except the big 4 (TP, TF, Manu, Mason) should we do it???? I think we should. He could play as PF and shoot threes if people double Duncan and he can guard guys like Nowitzki, West and Amare.
Here's the link : http://hoopshype.com/
So what do you guys think ???
No thanks, unless the Raptors are dying to just give him away. Was compared to Dirk before he was drafted, but looks more like Dirk-lite. Disappears in big games. Bonner brings much of the same and the Spurs don't have to give up anything for him.
bigger version of Bonner but at least Bargnani is consistent.
the big 4 is still tim, tony, manu and bruce. the same that brought us 3 les. you'll see it come PO time.
I think if you think Bargnani is good, then you need to watch more basketball.
Bargnani sucks and is one of the worst number 1 picks ever.
banana > bargnani
Dude is a freakin' bust. No thanks and no thanks.
O.K., I'm italian, so my opinion could be "conditioned"...but...
I think we should try.
Because, for what he can give, he's the best big to play with Duncan!
He would be a big improvement over Bonner.
Can shoot like Bonner, rebounds as well as him, play better defense, can block shots better than him and he can also go in penetration.
All he needs is to play with confidence...and he could benefit of playing in a good team like ours.
Bonner, Udoka, Voughn + second choice for Bargs...I'll do it in an hartbeat!!!
Bargnani for Bonner and Vaughn, I'll give it a shot.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...8~28&te=&cash=
Gigantic fail.
bonner is puttin up better numbers than this busts
This "fail" thing sure is stupid. Tell me why do you think this is a "gigantic fail" and maybe we could have a mature discussion
Oh pardon me.
Well, when you look at the said player in a purely rational point of view lets do.
Bargnani, stinks.
Bonner, while not an all star, is more serviceable and rebounds better, AND, shoots the ball better than Bargnani.
So maturely I say, Bargnani STINKS, Bonner, does NOT stink.
Thats why this is a gigantic bowl of pathetic fail.
To me they are pretty much the same with the exception that Bargnagni is a 7 footer, thing that could come in handy in the playoffs. Besides with Bonner you know that what you're getting is pretty much all you can get. With Bargnani there's always the chance that he starts playing at the level he's supossed to and if he doesn't, who cares? we'll still be getting the same production in a bigger, younger body.
Oh pardon me.
Well, when you look at the said player in a purely rational point of view lets do.
Bargnani, stinks.
Bonner, while not an all star, is more serviceable and rebounds better, AND, shoots the ball better than Bargnani.
So maturely I say, Bargnani STINKS, Bonner, does NOT stink.
Thats why this is a gigantic bowl of pathetic fail.
In the couple games that he got to start recently, he played well (26/6 and 19/6). In today's game, he has 13 at the half. So maybe he just needs to start
So......let me get this straight.
You think they are pretty much the same player but yet you want to get rid of of the player who has been showing improvment over someone who has not, just because Bargnani is taller? If the Spurs needed someone just because he was tall they would have kept Uwe Blab awhile back.
Bargnani should be at WalMart working customer service helping little old ladies reach the top shelf in the hardware dept., because his NBA skills are nil.
Bonner is better than Bargnani
They have kind of the same style of play with the difference that Bargnani is taller, younger and more talented. That's why I would trade him for Bonner.
Thank god you're not the Spurs' GM.
http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/player...?playerId=2987
Check out the last 5 games and tell me if you think Bonner could put those numbers.
no!
another shooter who is afraid of contact. no!!!!
Actaully....I think he could....if he was in Toronto.
The 5 blocks in one game also?
If the Raptors are serious about getting rid of Bargnani I will go for it no doubt. I think that playing in a well coached contender is what this kid needs.
For a shooter he sure sucks at shooting.
He is only 23 and he has time to improve, but right now he would not be better than Matt.
That said, I will wait at least 2 more years before calling him a bust. Of course for a #1 pick he is not good. But this draft was just weak.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
