and that doesnt mean that any of us care about USC or your lousy predictions.
USC still lost to Oregonk State. Tech at least lost to two respectable teams........one of which has a good shot at being national champs.
and Ohio State was a better choice because...........?
the only reason OSU was in there was because you can't have more than 2 teams per conference.
and that doesnt mean that any of us care about USC or your lousy predictions.
USC still lost to Oregonk State. Tech at least lost to two respectable teams........one of which has a good shot at being national champs.
Amen LaMarcus, and jgw owned once again with his homer usc takes. I also would love to play those over-rated usc punks this season so we could show them up once again in front of their home fans. Just remember, national champ. game is at the Rose Bowl next season-would be a great opportunity to show up yet another over-hyped usc team.
As for my boys at UT, a win is a win right? We pretty much sleep walked through the first half and then decided to start playing actual football in the
3rd quarter. Mack is now 3-0 in BCS games and you gotta love that kind of consistency.
As for next season, we are simply LOADED with talent coming back on this team. The one main area of rebuilding is the D line, but we have plenty of talented guys ready to step up and play. And to address running game concerns, get ready to watch C. Whaley. At about 6'3/230lbs, he should be a monster running the ball as the power back with Fozzy, Vondrell and J. Hills also adding to the mix at RB. Whaley also had two 400 plus yard rushing games this season, he looks like a MONSTER.![]()
UT's weakness is its offensive line. The run blocking and schemes have sucked major ass this year, moreso than normal. First we had to live with butterfingers Charles fumbling our way to close games, now we just have total total crap with the run. I almost want Charles back.
lol
i thought fozzie should have got more carries. hopefully we don't have any senior RBs to start over more talented players again.
I really am not tripping. All offensive starters minus Turner will be back. I think next years SC could be very good. This line is growing up together.
Until they lose to Stanford. Or UCLA. Or Oregon State.
i don't understand you at all, brah. if florida is so good how did they lose to mississippi? if t.u. is so good how did they lose to tekk? it happens...doesn't mean USC wasn't the best team this year. btw, oregon state played without their 2 best play makers, but you wouldn't know that.
this is the real reason. you t-sips are touchy creatures. newsflash...i don't like the longhorns, what a shocker. and this board is filled with t.u. fans and only 3, on a good day, Trojan fans. so yeah, i'm going to beat my chest a bit and try to make this forum a little more balanced. sorry you are woman.
those arkansas teams were ? one of them had 10 wins and SC rolled them up in arkansas. check yourself. (hint 2006)
lol, the truth comes out. poor little baby doesn't like that i don't give t.u. any credit...whaaa whaaa. grow up bag. maybe you guys will make it to the holiday or alamo bowl next year. t.u. has been to 3 bcs games...wow.
...i don't have the luxury of 20 Trojan fans coming on here telling you how much you've been owned, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen.
there's nothing greater than greatness.
Actually, (this must be the aggie education) I said there is no best team this year. So your questions mocking me about t.u. and florida are besides the point.
That arkansas team was crap. Even Brutalis admitted so when the season was over.
1. its relevant
2. b/c brutalis says so? ...lmao, are you serious? thats the weakest thing i've ever heard. brutalis thought Nutt was a ty coach...whoops
...be gone.
It doesn't really matter whether Brutalis was right or not (he was) because Arkansas was 5-7 this year, with bad losses and few quality wins. If you can't see that they were a bad team for yourself, well, take off the blinders.
what does arkansas's record have to do with 2006? Nutt left arkansas to go to mississippi and had great success in his first year (this year).
you don't make any sense and helped my argument (on the Nutt side). the 10 win arkansas team in 2006 was good, there isn't any way around it. the fact that they had some close losses at the end of the year is irrelevant.
^ I jumped in at half-time without knowing the score. Didn't realize this was about the 06 team or Nutt, I thought it was a discussion about Arkansas somehow impacting one of the teams that's claiming #1 this year. My bad.
what a dumb ing game.
Stoops does suck coaching the BCS games. They average like 60 points a game, have the best QB in the game and you run the freaken ball. You call 4 running plays inside the 10 and give the ball to Florida. You throw the ball before the half with 10 seconds left NOT in the in zone. You call a timeout in fear of a block punt only to have the other team call a timeout to block the punt and 5 guys have a shot at it. The running into the kicker was a accident. Man no matter how this game ends that guy obviously coaches different in the BCS games.
Stoops is a IDIOT. Every time there is a big down they run the ball. You have the Heisman winner!
OU should drop to 10 for making us watch this crapfest
Dude you are easily the biggest piece of , blindsided, one sided, biased poster on this ing forum.
I've seen captain mike give more ground in his homerism than you. You're a total bag piece of . It's entirely irrelevant, and everyone on this ing board knows it.
Poor Bradford, this guy could have been the overall pick in the draft. Stoops should give him his paycheck over the next 10 years to make up for the money he lost him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)