Newly Uncovered WTC 7 Video Betrays More Foreknowledge Of Collapse
If you're new here and like what you read, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed to get the latest news. Thanks for visiting!
Despite event being unprecedented in history
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Another video from 9/11 has been uncovered which proves that the collapse of WTC 7 was anticipated beforehand, despite that fact that the event was unprecedented - no steel framed building had completely collapsed from fire damage alone in previous history.
A widely publicized aspect of the collapse of Building 7 is the fact that news organizations received foreknowledge that it was coming down well in advance of its eventual collapse. Indeed, both BBC and CNN reported that the structure had collapsed nearly 30 minutes before it actually fell.
In the following clip, Fox News correspondent David Lee Miller states, “We are told by one firefighter source that a building identified as trade center number 7 is in danger of collapse, we are told that engineers have gotten as close as they can to the building and that this building is on fire and there is a chance that this building could give way and we are told that if it does they expect that it would collapse in a southerly direction.”
Watch the video.
The notion that WTC 7, a structurally reinforced 47-story office building, would completely collapse from fire damage alone could not possibly have been anticipated on 9/11. Such an occurrence had never happened before in history. The sheer improbability of such a scenario unfolding was underscored in February 2005 when the Windsor building in Madrid burned like an inferno for over 24 hours and did not collapse, while WTC 7 suffered limited fires across a comparatively miniscule area and collapsed within 7 seconds on 9/11.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
The fact that official sources told Fox News that the building would fall in a southerly direction is also highly suspect if one were to accept that notion that the collapse was accidental and not engineered with the aid of explosives. How would they know which way it would fall if the event was unprecedented?
This level of foreknowledge about an unprecedented event also arouses su ious when one considers the fact that former New York City chief emergency manager Jerome Hauer, whose office was on the 23d floor of WTC 7, was also a building collapse specialist. Hauer has attracted su ion from the 9/11 truth movement because of his zeal to push the official story in the hours after the attack when details were still sketchy.
Hauer was also Managing Director of Kroll Associates - the company that provided security for the WTC complex on 9/11 - and he also betrayed advance knowledge of the anthrax attacks a week before they happened by taking cipro, the anthrax-fighting antibiotic, well before the first anthrax letters were received.
Of course, this website has exhaustively do ented eyewitness accounts of the preparation for a deliberate demolition of Building 7 and establishment media organizations have responded by embarking on an almost obsessive debunking campaign in an attempt to stymie growing interest in the subject.
People like former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue expert Kevin McPadden are on record as having personally witnessed the countdown that preceded the collapse of Building 7 and others, like former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer, described hearing bombs tear down the building as he fled the collapse.
These people have been ignored in the midst of an organized effort to sweep the controversy under the carpet characterized most recently by a bizarre and completely unscientific NIST report which concluded that a “new phenomenon,” and one that contradicts the very laws of physics, was responsible for the collapse of WTC 7.
Research related articles:
WTC 7 Emergency Head Was Building Collapse Specialist
Clarifying the Collapse Time of WTC 7
Leaked NIST Docs: “Unusual” Event Before Collapse Of WTC 7
Newly released video shows how easily electronic voting machines can be hacked, pried open
Scientists: “Unusual Magnetic Forces” Caused Twin Towers Collapse
No BBC, WTC 7 Did Not Collapse “Due To Fire” & The Final 9/11 Mystery Is Not Solved
Details Emerge on new WTC Collapse Videos
NIST WTC7 Report parody video
“Unusual Magnetic Forces” Should Not Have Caused the Twin Towers to Collapse
NIST’s WTC7 collapse models: some observations
DNC Warehouse “Concentration Camp” Uncovered By Reporters
Peter Schiff new VIDEO on the Coming Collapse Dec 16
44 Responses to “Newly Uncovered WTC 7 Video Betrays More Foreknowledge Of Collapse”
http://www.prisonplanet.com/newly-un...-collapse.html
Engineers inspected the building and firefighters measured the deformation of it with a transit line. That's how they determined it would probably collapse. This is well do ented.
They determined it would fall to the south because the south side of the building was where all the structural damage had occurred from being hit by 1,368-foot tall tower and it was also where they measured the deformation.
Little things like that tipped them off.
It's nice to see that the three members of the spurstalk brain trust weighed in first for us.
An idea totally contradicted by the FEMA report, which is then totally contradicted by the NIST working hypothesis, which is then totally contradicted by the final NIST report.
No real engineer would have concluded that WTC 7 would collapse, based on your theory.
Fire Can't Melt Steel!
Well, the people on the scene didn't have the luxury of six months or seven years to make a detailed report about what they thought might happen in a matter of hours. If you recall, it was a busy day -- forgive them if they couldn't run several hundred computer models and give you the answer you wanted.
And what idea was contradicted? That there was damage to the south side and deformation actually pointed towards a collapse. To totally contradict this, the subsequent reports would have to have said the building was going to collapse some other direction. They did not. The reports differ on causation, but the symptoms were there on 9/11.
They did -- and you are accusing them and the FDNY of being in on the conspiracy. You are a reprehensible human being. You need to tell us everyone you think is in on this conspiracy of yours and then I suggest you go and try to make a citizen's arrest. Just walk into a New York firehouse and start taking them in. Do it.No real engineer would have concluded that WTC 7 would collapse, based on your theory.
The engineers were told it would collapse by someone privy to the information.
Based on the small amount of damage and small isolated fires, no real engineer would have predicted collapse.
They should've done a contolled demolition on an even SMALLER building. That would've been absolutely horrifying.
Even though there's absolutely ZERO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE to suggest that WTC7 was a controlled demolition, I just don't understant what MOTIVE there would be for wanting to do a controlled demolition on a building that is totally insignificant next to the twin towers.
I can't speak to WTC7 because, at the time, no one heard of or gave a rats ass about a small building when two huge towers were on fire, but a senior engineer in our office predicted that the one or both of the twin towers would collapse.
There's zero physical evidence that WTC 7 even existed, as none of the steel was recovered.They should've done a contolled demolition on an even SMALLER building. That would've been absolutely horrifying.
Even though there's absolutely ZERO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE to suggest that WTC7 was a controlled demolition, I just don't understant what MOTIVE there would be for wanting to do a controlled demolition on a building that is totally insignificant next to the twin towers.
We can recover items from the bottom of the ocean and from the North pole, but we are unable to recover steel beams from downtown Manhattan.
And they have obviously come out and told their story about how they were mislead by the evil overlords hundreds of times since 2001.
There was a tremendous amount of damage. There were large fires. Real engineers were there and they predicted the collapse.on the small amount of damage and small isolated fires, no real engineer would have predicted collapse.
I know you can't be happy unless you feel oppressed by shadowy figures controlling your life, but in this case you are simply and utterly wrong.
Of course the steel was recovered.
Really. The final NIST report on WTC 7 says none was recovered.
Really? But they didn't predict the collapse of WTC 3, WTC 4, WTC 5, or WTC 6?
Nice.
It's sad that so many people have wasted their otherwise useful energy on this stupid subject.
quoting an article from prisonplanet.com was your first mistake
"A Newly Uncovered top secret video made for national TV by Fox News"
So it's still there in a pile on Vesey Street?
Wrong again.
sort of like trying to uncover a gigantic steel beam from WTC 7, easier said then done.
I still don't get it.
Why WTC7?
Was a plane supposed to hit that small building?
Were the "conspirators" just bored?
Did they not want to waste leftover explosives?
FL93 was supposed to hit WTC 7, but it got stuck in the runway 43 minutes. By the time it was hijacked, it was too late to get back to NYC.
WTC 3's collapse didn't need to be predicted since both north and south towers fell directly on top of it.
Before:
After the south tower collapse:
After the north tower collapse:
Building 4? Same story:
Buildings 5 and 6 had massive damage from debris from the north tower, and both burned quite fiercely after that collapse, and experienced partial internal collapses themselves. They did not totally collapse, but they were not constructed with 40+ floors over a Con Ed substation like WTC 7.
Building 5:
Building 6:
Authorities did not predict the collapse of the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church either.
So obviously Bartholomew I is the mastermind behind 9/11.
That's where they found Megatron.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
