I missed the invocation the first time around, but it turns out it was a bit of a mish-mash.
Not that it would make any difference to you, MH, but Warren tipped his hat to both Judaism and Islam in the invocation.
His citation of the Shema seems to have caused minor consternation among some Jews for trivializing the most sacred prayer of Judaism; his reference to God as the "compassionate and merciful one" echoes a standard opening from the Koran: Bismillah al-Rahman al-Rahim.(In the name of Allah, the most compassionate, the most merciful.) Interestingly, it's the fundamentalists who are complaining the most about this.
Also, his version of the Our Father included the interpolation "for thine is the kingdom, the power and the glory, for ever and ever" which Roman Catholics do not say.
The e enical gesture was purely rhetorical from what I could see. The only participants in the inauguration were protestant Christians. No rabbi, no Catholic priest, no other clergy were represented.
Just curious, does anyone know if this is much different from previous inaugurals?

Reply With Quote
at the OP getting owned on the definition of 'separation of Church and State', then thinking that quoting anti-Christian statements validates his original argument.
