Reply With Quote
Looks like someone slept through grade school.
see i know thats were you were going and there was no recruting violations with bomar the probles were after he was already there and as soon as the school found out they reported it to the ncaa and kicked his ass off the team.
after an ou applied the ncaa ruleing the probation was lifted but it was never for recruting
so try again ass clown
Looks like someone slept through grade school.
Yeah, as soon as they found out the ncaa would find out...ass clown.
That auto dealer "employed" half the team.
The $ooner program has been dirty since Bud Wilkinson and remains so today. Sorry to break the news to you.
Oklahoma's on probation right now jackass. Try again.
i think it was lifted, were did you find your info.
Their wins were given back but they still lost scholarships and are still on probation.
http://www.gnextinc.com/ousoonersblo...caa-major.html
History of Oklahoma NCAA Major Violations
I've been e-mailed and asked. What's the history of NCAA violations involving the University of Oklahoma football team. This includes only major violations (as listed by the NCAA) for football team. The NCAA list six major infractions by the Oklahoma football team dating back to January 1956.
January 11, 1956 - NCAA found University of Oklahoma football team violated improper transportation; extra benefits; improper recruiting inducements.
Result: 1 year Probation
January 11, 1960 - NCAA found University of Oklahoma football team violated improper financial aid; improper recruiting inducements; outside fund; lack of ins utional control.
Result: 1 year Probation, 1 year post season ban, 1 year television ban
September 20, 1973 - NCAA found University of Oklahoma football team violated extra benefits; including improper recruiting inducements; lodging, publicity and transportation; tryouts; excessive number of official visits; excessive time for official visits; in addition to academic fraud; eligibility; unethical conduct.
Result: 2 year Probation, 2 year post season ban, 2 year television ban, one assistant football coach not allowed to recruit.
November 11, 1980 - NCAA found University of Oklahoma football team violated improper financial aid; improper recruiting contacts, entertainment and transportation.
Result: Publicly reprimand.
December 19, 1988 - NCAA found University of Oklahoma football team violated improper transportation; extra benefits; complimentary tickets; improper recruiting contacts, employment, entertainment, inducements and transportation; unethical conduct; outside fund; lack of ins utional control; certification of compliance.
Result: 3 years probation; 1 year television ban; 3 years probation; Maximum of 18 initial grants for 1989-90 and 1990-91 football season. maximum of eight coaches may recruit off campus for 1989-90; OU limited to maximum of 50 official visits for 1988-89 and 1989-90; The University of Oklahoma files annual reports regarding compliance programs; University of Oklahoma must show cause why more penalties should not be imposed if ins ution does not remove two assistant coaches and recruiting coordinator from recruiting and disassociate one representative.
And then the latest July 11, 2007. The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions has penalized the University of Oklahoma for major violations in its football program.
http://www.briancombs.net/854/
With the Oklahoma Sooners’ undeserved national championship game approaching, let’s look back at the history of rules breaking at this fine ins ution.
1889: The Land Run
Territories in Oklahoma were opened for settlement at high noon on April 22, 1889, with an estimated 50,000 people lined up for their piece of the available two million acres. It was called a land run as land was claimed on a first come, first served basis.
Those who broke the rules by crossing the border into the territory before it was allowed were said to have been crossing the border sooner, leading to the term “sooners”, which eventually became the state’s official nickname.
Thus, the state ins utionalized the approval of cheating.
1955: Recruiting Violations
Accusations were made by the NCAA of paying player’s tuition after their eligibility had expired, paying the bills of player’s families, and of the liberal spreading around of money in general. OU was put on probation for two years, with the NCAA noting how much it appreciated OU’s cooperation.
1960: The Slush Fund
A NCAA report stated that an OU athletic department official (unnamed) failed to report a slush fund operated by OU staff. The official stonewalled when its existence was revealed. OU was put on “indefinite suspension” until OU proved the slush fund was gone.
1973: Various Violations
Accusations included boosters providing transportation to recruits, and a Sooner assistant falsifying QB Kerry Jackson’s transcript so he would be eligible (the assistant was not terminated). The NCAA gave OU a TV ban and a bowl game ban. Barry Switzer was on the staff at this time, but was an assistant to head coach Chuck Fairbanks.
1980: Sweating the Small Stuff
Lots of smoke, but not much fire. Switzer mocked the NCAA for prosecuting them in his book, “Bootlegger’s Boy”, but players Charles Thompson and Brian Bosworth reported getting paid well in their respective books.
1988: Switzer’s True Colors Show
Any doubts that Switzer ran a dirty program were dispelled by the NCAA’s report covering 1985 and 1986. Assistant coaches offered envelopes with cash to recruits, cars were provided, bills were taken care of, and game tickets were sold. An internal OU investigation revealed no additional violations. Unfortunately, ex-players and recruits talked, so the NCAA reported additional violations.
OU again investigated and found nothing more. The NCAA sanctioned OU, and informed them that if they fought the sanctions, the NCAA had more they could investigate.
Oklahoma received a three year probation, a two year television ban, and a one year bowl ban. Switzer was fired.
April 2006: A Phone Addiction
The NCAA revealed an investigation into hundreds of improper recruiting phone calls by former basketball coach Kelvin Sampson’s staff. Oklahoma escaped major sanctions, as the NCAA found OU guilty of a “failure to monitor,” a less severe ruling than “lack of ins utional control,” which had been recommended by the NCAA’s enforcement staff.
The NCAA backed OU’s self-imposed two year probation, but also issued a public reprimand and censure.
August 2006: Big Red Imports
Right before the 2006 football season, it was revealed that Rhett Bomar and J.D. Quinn had been kicked off the team. They had been “employed” by car dealership Big Red Imports, and being paid for work they did not perform. They were let go from the team right before the NCAA came down on OU.
Additional investigations by OU concluded that no additional violations had occurred, even though Adrian Peterson had purchased a vehicle from the dealership before securing financing, driven it for several weeks, and then returned the car. Oklahoma ruled Peterson did not violate rules because the dealership said it was normal business practice.
Oklahoma was forced by the NCAA to forfeit its wins from the 2005 season and lost two scholarships for the 2008-09 and 2009-10 school years. It’s probation from the Sampson problem was also extended.
Last edited by spurtime; 01-21-2009 at 11:23 AM.
if its only for the football team why is this on there it is for basketball. all so like i said the only one that happened under this staff they took care of. I know your going to come on here and talk and call me a homer but i never said the school dident have problems in the past but since stoops has taken over its been a clean run program.
on a side note my Greatgrand Mother passed to day so i will be out of town for the next few days and will have to get back to what ever crap you talk next week
have a good weekend
It's the entire athletic program you . Your reading comprehension equals your spelling.
maybe you should read again mother er it say's football team
This sentence makes absolutely no sense. No suprise there. Try again with punctuation and proper grammer and I might try responding. I'm tired of translating your re ed language. It's obviously not English.
My statement wasn't limited to football, funboy...
I mean the entire athletics program...
not that it ing matters any more but in the post you did say football program
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions