A huge lie. Science education that does not encourage students to evaluate competing hypothesis by rigorous standards and skepticism is not teaching students about the way science actually operates. Unless he wants the curriculum to include rigorous debunking of intelligent design as something non-scientific, ID has no place in biology classrooms.
Bingo. Paint evolution as speculation and faith to drag it down to the same level.
Unconscionable strawman. Natural selection is a game of dice only when you look at it from a few inches above ground. Look at it from 1000 feet above and it's very ordered; beneficial adaptations win out. Also, order from disorder on our planet is powered by the energy from our sun and from our planet's molten core, so his unconscious application of the 2nd law of thermodynamics is incorrect.
Another strawman. Non-belief = nihlism? Garbage. I like to hike mountains, go to the beach, meet people, study a math book, have a nice steak, etc. Happiness is a pretty good purpose in life.
The fruits of rigorous application of the scientific method are having amazing technology at our fingertips. To borrow an argument from physicist Walter Lewin, today we live in an incredible age; for a lousy couple hundred bucks a month we have the equivalent of 100 slaves working like dogs for us 12 hours a day, without any time off.
If you tell an impressionable child what he's learning is nonsense, he'll buy into it. Everyone likes to complain about how our nation isn't producing great engineers in large numbers like India or China without thinking why that may be; perhaps it's our peoples' indifference to education fueling this.
Sadly, this will probably be the case.