Reply With Quote
Do we need God to tell us that killing an innocent human being as a matter of convenience is morally wrong?
If it's a human being, and you end it's life....it's morally wrong.
If it's not a human being, you can do whatever you want to it.
Is it possible President Obama is trying to do the same? I've actually never heard him say otherwise. While you may believe he's doing something improper, its entirely possible he believes he's doing the right thing in order to save more lives in the long run.
Do we need God to tell us that killing an innocent human being as a matter of convenience is morally wrong?
If it's a human being, and you end it's life....it's morally wrong.
If it's not a human being, you can do whatever you want to it.
It is possible and I hope it is true.
However, I don't think that excuses me from my obligation to speak up for what I believe to be right.
Ya know, in the end, I love me some Theocracy.
By all means speak out - I only hope you apply your standards equally. I feel that you don't do that - especially when you consider some of the actions President Bush has made and how much you support him.
Your ignorance is the direct result of your stubborn disregard for God and His Word.
Jesus said plainly that He is the way, the truth, and the life. He is the source of right direction and there is no other.
Sorry to leave abruptly guys but someone else will be taking the computer in about five minutes.
Go to .
... then I learned that all moral judgments are "value judgments," that all value judgments are subjective, and that none can be proved to be either "right" or "wrong." I even read somewhere that the Chief Justice of the United States had written that the American Cons ution expressed nothing more than collective value judgments. Believe it or not, I figured out what apparently the Chief Justice couldn't figure out for himself -- that if the rationality of one value judgment was zero, multiplying it by millions would not make it one bit more rational. Nor is there any "reason" to obey the law for anyone, like myself, who has the boldness and daring -- the strength of character -- to throw off its shackles.... I discovered that to become truly free, truly unfettered, I had to become truly uninhibited. And I quickly discovered that the greatest obstacle to my freedom, the greatest block and limitation to it, consists in the insupportable "value judgment" that I was bound to respect the rights of others. I asked myself, who were these "others"? Other human beings, with human rights? Why is it more wrong to kill a human animal than any other animal, a pig or a sheep or a steer? Is your life more to you than a hog's life to a hog? Why should I be willing to sacrifice my pleasure more for the one than the other? Surely, you would not, in this age of scientific enlightenment, declare that God or nature has marked some pleasures as "moral" or "good" and others as "immoral" or "bad"? In any case, let me assure you, my dear young lady, that there is absolutely no comparison between the pleasure I might take in eating ham and the pleasure I anticipate in raping and murdering you. That is the honest conclusion to which my education has led me -- after the most conscientious examination of my spontaneous and uninhibited self.
So did this guy
so if he told you that God told him to kill his son, would you believe him and let him walk or would you call the cops?I would assume that God had sent me as Angel to say, " Stop, do not harm him!"
Are you kidding?!!!!!!!!!!???
Ask Bo, my mom, anyone who knows me.
I NEVER cared for president Bush. I voted for him begrudingly in 2004 and ONLY because he was pro-life.
I wouldn't vote in 2000 because Gore supported abortion and I could not stomach the thought of voting for Bush.
I don't deal in hypotheticals.
I know you don't.
It's really a shame.
Bye guys!
What a shame. I'm not saying this is how you feel but you basically put unborn fetuses above our soldiers.
```
Your whole religion is hypothetical.
You know. I strive to know God. I spend hours and hours pouring over the psalms and gospels. I've read Kierkegaard until my ears bled. Brothers Karamazov three and half times in two years. Took a class on existential Christianity. Read The Idiot twice. Barclay's, The Gospel of Luke. Tolstoy's Resurrection, Confession, What I Believe. I've gone to church. I've gone to my parent's bible study. I've met with a pastor. I've gone to a shrink. I've meditated. I've prayed. I've begged and begged and begged for God to come into my life and I've put myself through an absolute intellectual and spiritual ringer in the pursuit. And at the end of the day I'm a weary and scared agnostic and what you just said is just about the most offensive and stupid thing anybody's ever said to me, on a message board or otherwise.
you, you simple. ing. .
so Obama doesn't like babies. nobody's perfect
christian jihadist forum
Um, I'm not quite sure how I can say this without sounding like a , but please don't attach my name to your beliefs.
The only point of my earlier post is that abortion is not the only service that family planning agencies provide. Or, more specifically, that the president's decision to lift the ban on funding for such agencies is not, in any way, the same thing as killing babies.
Last edited by CuckingFunt; 01-23-2009 at 04:35 PM.
I just don’t want to pay for women’s abortions in Saudi Arabia…Why cant Obama & his worshippers understand this?
"The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money"
There are no abortions in Saudi Arabia to be paid for.
Do we have to call it pro choice, when in actuality it's pro-women's choice. Abortion is so ing hypocritical
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
