Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30
  1. #1
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    101,216
    Let's hope so

  2. #2
    Veteran
    My Team
    Utah Jazz
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    7,778
    Already has. My sister has diabetes. George Bush and Republicans wanted to keep it that way, ostensibly in the name of treating individual cells as human life. Joyous day.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012302168.html
    FDA OKs 1st Embryonic Stem Cell Trial

    FRIDAY, Jan. 23 (HealthDay News) -- The first human trial using embryonic stem cells as a medical treatment has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

    Geron Corp., a California-based biotech company, has been given the OK to implant embryonic stem cells in eight to 10 paraplegic patients who can use their arms but can't walk. Stem cell injections will be given within two weeks of the injury. The study will begin this summer, and will be conducted at up to seven different medical centers.

    "This marks the dawn of a new era in medical therapeutics," Dr. Thomas B. Okarma, Geron's president and CEO said during a Friday morning teleconference. "This approach is one that reaches beyond pills and scalpels to achieve a new level of healing."

    Ultimately, this type of therapy might have the power to restore permanent organ and tissue function, Okarma said. The goal of this first trial is to see if injecting embryonic stem cells into humans is safe. However, the researchers will also be looking for signs of improvement in the patients' ability to feel sensation in or move their legs.

    Patients will receive injections at the site of the injury. It is hoped these cells will mature into cells that will repair damaged nerves and produce chemicals that nerve cells need to function and grow.

    This phase I trial will be limited to patients whose injury is located in the middle of the spine. If the trial is successful, Okarma said, the hope is to extend the treatment to patients with cervical spine injuries who are paralyzed from the neck down.

    Okarma said the injections must be given early after the injury, before scar tissue has developed that would prevent the cells from growing, but after the initial swelling has subsided.

    In addition, patients will receive anti-rejection drugs for about two months, after which they should no longer need those drugs. Patients will be followed for at least one year, he said.

    The treatment is not expected to restore full function to patients, but the researchers hope to see modest gains. "Any return of bladder or bowel function, a return of sensation, or a return of lower extremity locomotion would be a very exciting finding," Okarma said.

    In experiments with rats, researchers found these cells were safe and did restore some function. "These cells insulate as well as stimulate nerve fibers, leading to restoration of function in animal models of spinal cord injury," Okarma said.

    The cost of this therapy isn't known yet, but Okarma said it would be "affordable."

    Embryonic stem cells are the most basic human cells. These cells are believed to be capable of growing into any type of cell.

    The controversy surrounding the use of these cells has become a political issue, with some objecting that the use of these cells destroys potential life because they must be extracted from human embryos. This belief resulted in the Bush administration banning federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.

    While the Obama administration has indicated that it will lift the ban, the stem cells used in this trial were obtained from one of the Bush administration's approved stem cell lines. However, no federal funds were used in the development of this treatment.

    A decade has passed since the first embryonic stem cells were isolated at the University of Wisconsin, in groundbreaking research that was funded by Geron Corp.

    Geron is also working on using embryonic stem cells to treat failing hearts and to create insulin-producing islets for type 1 diabetics, Okarma said.

    "Embryonic stem cells are really nature's own way of making more of ourselves," Okarma said. "We are simply harnessing the biology of normal human development in our attempts to achieve permanent cures to chronic disease and injury."

    Peter Kiernan, chairman of the Christopher And Dana Reeves Foundation, said he's excited about this latest development in stem cell research.

    "This is not just a comet across our sky, this is really more like dawn," Kiernan said. "We are beginning a vast human experiment, and we have been waiting an extremely long time to get to this point. This is a very significant development."

    At the same time, Kiernan said he does not overestimate what can be expected from this trial.

    "Of the millions of people dealing with paralysis in our nation, they are all delighted with subtle increases in function," Kiernan said. "We eat, drink, sleep getting people out of wheelchairs, but the reality of the world we are in is if people get bowel function, some sexual function, some ability for movement, that is a wonderful outcome."

  3. #3
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    Too late for my brother. Thanks again, Bush.

  4. #4
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    101,216
    Already has. My sister has diabetes. George Bush and Republicans wanted to keep it that way, ostensibly in the name of treating individual cells as human life. Joyous day.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012302168.html
    Damn, talk about timing

    Too late for my brother. Thanks again, Bush.
    So sorry for your brother

  5. #5
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    2,592
    Already has. My sister has diabetes. George Bush and Republicans wanted to keep it that way, ostensibly in the name of treating individual cells as human life. Joyous day.
    No he hasn't, according to the article you posted. The treatment going to human trial was developed under W's rules (which really boiled down to not creating any new embyonic stem cell lines).

    Not that I agree with W's stance or anything, just clarifying.

  6. #6
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    True enough, getting around the ban was just an unnecessary hoop to jump through.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    My Team
    Utah Jazz
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    7,778
    The treatment going to human trial was developed under W's rules (which really boiled down to not creating any new embyonic stem cell lines).
    That's true, and I'm for only having read a little past the headline. Still, whether the cells were developed under Bush's guidelines, I doubt his FDA would've approved their usage had he remained president.

  8. #8
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    20,699
    My sister has diabetes.
    What kind?

  9. #9
    Veteran
    My Team
    Utah Jazz
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    7,778
    Type 1

    Sorry to hear that chump.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    2,592
    True enough, getting around the ban was just an unnecessary hoop to jump through.
    Quite true. This might have been ready years earlier if Bush had allowed it.

    That's true, and I'm for only having read a little past the headline. Still, whether the cells were developed under Bush's guidelines, I doubt his FDA would've approved their usage had he remained president.
    Quite likely. It's a stupid ban anyway.

  11. #11
    Mr Robinsons hood denizen Creepn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    4,965
    This issue is right up there with the economy issue for me.

  12. #12
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    676
    I am very glad we will finally see progression in stem cell research.

    I give you guys, chump and bali, a lot of but I am sorry your loved ones were victims of the times.

  13. #13
    Veteran temujin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,408
    Stem cells research was actively pursued in the US under the Bush administration.

    They stopped grants from federal agencies and derivation of new cell lines from human embryos.

    That said, some of the major advancements recently made to the field were contributed from US labs, thanks to state and charities money.

    In a much as Bush was manifestly one of the worst american presidents, to sell the idea that nothing was done because of some veto of his is simply wrong.

  14. #14
    Veteran temujin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,408
    Too late for my brother. Thanks again, Bush.
    Sorry to read that.

  15. #15
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    Thanks. I don't blame Bush for his death -- he was in a bad way. I just don't want any progress that could help others in his position artificially stymied by pointless ideology.

  16. #16
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    Shame on all of you for wanting to torture stem cells in the name of safety....

  17. #17
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    le:

    Will Oboama do something for stem cell research?
    I am tired of people lacking essential specificity.

    President Bush and most republicans are only against “Embryonic” Stem Cell research. Not Stem Cell research!

    Please, keep the proper context, or I will label you as ignorant!

    The problem with promoting Embryonic Stem Cell research, is then you create a market of creating life for the sole purpose of experimenting on it and killing it!

    There are two other types of stem cells that do not destroy embryos, and have been more promising!

  18. #18
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    I am very glad we will finally see progression in stem cell research.
    Again, you forget to say "Embryonic" stem cell!

    Adult stem cell research has been advancing nicely. Just not newsworthy because you cannot do Bush Bashing over it. To date, only Adult Stem Cell research has practical applications.

    From wiki, Adult stem cell:

    Adult stem cell treatments have been used for many years to successfully treat leukemia and related bone/blood cancers utilizing bone marrow transplants. The use of adult stem cells in research and therapy is not considered as controversial as the use of embryonic stem cells, because the production of adult stem cells does not require the destruction of an embryo. Consequently, the majority of US government funding provided for research in this field is restricted to supporting adult stem cell research.
    In 2008 the first full transplant of a human organ grown from adult stem cells was carried out by Paolo Macchiarini, at the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona on Claudia Castillo, a Colombian female adult whose trachea had collapsed due to tuberculosis. Researchers from the University of Padua, the University of Bristol, and Politecnico di Milano harvested a section of trachea from a donor and stripped off the cells that could cause an immune reaction, leaving a grey trunk of cartilage. This section of trachea was then "seeded" with stem cells taken from Ms. Castillo's bone marrow and a new section of trachea was grown in the laboratory over four days. The new section of trachea was then transplanted into the left main bronchus of the patient. Because the stem cells were harvested from the patient's own bone marrow Professor Macchiarini did not think it was necessary for her to be given anti-rejection (immunosuppressive) medication and when the procedure was reported four months later in The Lancet, the patient's immune system was showing no signs of rejecting the transplant.
    Please, don't force me to call people ignorant on the subject.

  19. #19
    Uno, Dos, Tres, Catorce... Ya Vez's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    500
    nothing has stopped private companies from doing there own research or am I wrong.. what about Europe and Canada has it continued there... ?

  20. #20
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    nothing has stopped private companies from doing there own research or am I wrong.. what about Europe and Canada has it continued there... ?
    You are exactly right. Only government funding for Embryonic Stem Cell research has been stopped. Private and corporate funds can be used all they want. Those holding the money must not see future profits on the subject!

  21. #21
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    Propaganda Cobra.

  22. #22
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    101,216
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090307/...ama_stem_cells

    Source: Obama to reverse limits on stem cell work



    WASHINGTON – Reversing an eight-year-old limit on potentially life-saving science, President Barack Obama plans to lift restrictions Monday on taxpayer-funded research using embryonic stem cells.

    The long-promised move will allow a rush of research aimed at one day better treating, if not curing, ailments from diabetes to paralysis — research that crosses partisan lines, backed by such notables as Nancy Reagan and the late Christopher Reeve. But it stirs intense controversy over whether government crosses a moral line with such research.

    Obama will hold an event at the White House to announce the move, a senior administration official said Friday. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the policy had not yet been publicly announced.

    Embryonic stem cells are master cells that can morph into any cell of the body. Scientists hope to harness them so they can create replacement tissues to treat a variety of diseases — such as new insulin-producing cells for diabetics, cells that could help those with Parkinson's disease or maybe even Alzheimer's, or new nerve connections to restore movement after spinal injury.

    "I feel vindicated after eight years of struggle, and I know it's going to energize my research team," said Dr. George Daley of the Harvard Stem Cell Ins ute and Children's Hospital of Boston, a leading stem cell researcher.

    But the research is controversial because days-old embryos must be destroyed to obtain the cells. They typically are culled from fertility-clinic leftovers otherwise destined to be thrown away.

    Under President George W. Bush, taxpayer money for that research was limited to a small number of stem cell lines that were created before Aug. 9, 2001, lines that in many cases had some drawbacks that limited their potential usability.

    But hundreds more of such lines — groups of cells that can continue to propagate in lab dishes — have been created since then, ones that scientists say are healthier, better suited to creating treatments for people rather than doing basic laboratory science.

    Work didn't stop. Indeed, it advanced enough that this summer, the private Geron Corp. will begin the world's first study of a treatment using human embryonic stem cells, in people who recently suffered a spinal cord injury.

    Nor does Obama's change fund creation of new lines. But it means that scientists who until now have had to rely on private donations to work with these newer stem cell lines can apply for government money for the research, just like they do for studies of gene therapy or other treatment approaches.

    The aim of the policy is to restore "scientific integrity" to the process, the administration official said.

    "America's biomedical research enterprise experienced steady decline over the past eight years, with shrinking budgets and policies that elevated ideology over science. This slowed the pace of discovery and the search for cures," said Sean Morrison, director of the University of Michigan's Center for Stem Cell Biology.

    Critics immediately denounced the move.

    "Taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for experiments that require the destruction of human life," said Tony Perkins of the conservative Family Research Council. "President Obama's policy change is especially troubling given the significant adult stem cell advances that are being used to treat patients now without harming or destroying human embryos."

    Indeed, there are different types of stem cells: So-called adult stem cells that produce a specific type of tissue; younger stem cells found floating in amniotic fluid or the placenta. Scientists even have learned to reprogram certain cells to behave like stem cells.

    But even researchers who work with varying types consider embryonic stem cells the most flexible and thus most promising form — and say that science, not politics, should ultimately judge.

    "Science works best and patients are served best by having all the tools at our disposal," Daley said.

    Obama made it clear during the campaign he would overturn Bush's directive.

    During the campaign, Obama said, "I strongly support expanding research on stem cells. I believe that the restrictions that President Bush has placed on funding of human embryonic stem cell research have handcuffed our scientists and hindered our ability to compete with other nations."

    He said he would lift Bush's ban and "ensure that all research on stem cells is conducted ethically and with rigorous oversight."

    "Patients and people who've been patient advocates are going to be really happy," said Amy Comstock Rick of the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research.

    The ruling will bring one immediate change: As of Monday, scientists who've had to meticulously keep separate their federally funded research and their privately funded stem cell work — from buying separate microscopes to even setting up labs in different buildings — won't have that expensive hurdle anymore.

    Next, scientists can start applying for research grants from the National Ins utes of Health. The NIH already has begun writing guidelines that, among other things, are expected to demand that the cells being used were derived with proper informed consent from the woman or couple who donated the original embryo

  23. #23
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    i think the govt are hypocrites reason being

    its okay to have designer babies, but not okay for stem cell research? they should drop the ideals and approve such projects, who knows what we can cure...someone has to make the first step....

  24. #24
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    Too late for my brother. Thanks again, Bush.
    bush did not stop stem research to begin with
    but blame him
    he gets blame for everthing
    does he get blamed for your job you have now to?
    the money in your bank?
    or does he get blamed for everything bad in your life
    Last edited by ducks; 03-06-2009 at 10:31 PM.

  25. #25
    Veteran
    My Team
    Utah Jazz
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    7,778
    Yup, ducks with his obligatory "I'm the of the day" post. you ducks.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •