Official: Spurs Trades Thread - Ideas and Scenarios

[DaBears]

thats the guy batum!! Doesnt solve the bigman problem but he shows a heck of alot in talent.

[DaBears]

Besides San Antonio deserves a player that gets us on Sportscenter every know and again with some alley-opps. i havent seen an alley opp from the SPURS since Clinton was in office.

[sonic21]

how about this

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...9~24&te=&cash=

[DaBears]

Thats doesnt really help the SPURS any. Your giving up 3- guys for one. Matt bonner by himself has better stats than turif. Need decent score and BIGMAN who can through some bows elbows. Rebound black. Ronnie my freind is a little undersized at the 4 position.

[DaBears]

I think this trade works out for the best. SPURS would have a nice run at a couple more rings with this lineup. Check it out for your self.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...24~24&te=&cash=

Starting 5:
Tony Parker
Micheal Finley
J.R. Smith
Kenyon Martin
Tim Duncan


Equals CHAMPIONSHIPS

[mardigan]

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...4~24&te=&cash=

I like this one, even though its unrealistic that the Warriors would do it.

[Shastafarian]

I think this trade works out for the best. SPURS would have a nice run at a couple more rings with this lineup. Check it out for your self.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...24~24&te=&cash=

Starting 5:
Tony Parker
Micheal Finley
J.R. Smith
Kenyon Martin
Tim Duncan


Equals CHAMPIONSHIPS

Just stop...please

[Russ]

Nazr Mohammed anyone?

[ManuTP9]

Nazr Mohammed anyone?

elson?

[Russ]

elson?

I like 'em both.

[Shastafarian]

Nazr Mohammed anyone?

elson?

How about Malik Rose

[sonic21]

Ely?

[mardigan]

Batteer!

[Duncan2177]

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...te=&cash=24:15

[Chieflion]

Here's the trade : Tony Parker for Greg Oden + Someone (to match the salaries)

The questions:

1)Do you think the Spurs would do this trade ?
2)Do you think the Blazers would do this trade ?
3)Do you think there's a possibility this trade might happen or at least be considered by the teams ?

Here are my answers :

1)Yes!
2)Maybe...
3)I think it's a big dream for the Spurs. I don't think it will happen but I hope I'm wrong and I wanna know your opinion.

I believe Greg Oden is SERIOUSLY underrated at the moment and I believe he's not well-coached either, so his trade value is not what it should be and the Blazers are looking for a good PG. If I were Popovich I would definitely push hard to make this trade happen.

That was my idea. you.

[Rogue]

jakie butler > NM and elson both

[DPG21920]

That was my idea. you.

I would not take credit for that.

[ManuTP9]

jakie butler > NM and elson both

agreed

[Chieflion]

I would not take credit for that.

Actually, all of us have different views of Oden, plus he is starting to get it together, add Bayless (above average defense and penetration ability for a rookie, just needs playing time) and Outlaw(long versatile 3 player and can start for the Spurs) to the deal and we have a contender. Salary matches too. 2010 seems more realistic after this too.

[Spur-Addict]

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...te=&cash=24:15

I always loved his energy.

I would not take credit for that.

[underdawg]

Doubt Sac would do this, but..

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...3~24&te=&cash=

Also, you trade the Clips a second rounder (maybe some cash) for Cheikh Samb (7.1' - blocks shots and rebounds.) He has a better shot than Ian and runs the floor better - blocks and rebounds are similar. Plug him in somewhere and I'm pretty confident he improves our interior defense against athletic bigs and guards that have been getting free passes to the rim.

Not a major change, but you now have 3 players that create offense (TP, Manu and Salmons.)

[Chieflion]

Doubt Sac would do this, but..

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/feature...3~24&te=&cash=

Also, you trade the Clips a second rounder (maybe some cash) for Cheikh Samb (7.1' - blocks shots and rebounds.) He has a better shot than Ian and runs the floor better - blocks and rebounds are similar. Plug him in somewhere and I'm pretty confident he improves our interior defense against athletic bigs and guards that have been getting free passes to the rim.

Not a major change, but you now have 3 players that create offense (TP, Manu and Salmons.)

We need a big. What is the point of trading Bonner (a big) and screwing up 2010.

[underdawg]

We need a big. What is the point of trading Bonner (a big) and screwing up 2010.

I don't think you get a quality big this season, so getting a functional big (I know I'm stretching it with Samb) and Salmons salary is only 5.8 mil in 2010. Bonner's and Udoka's salaries are a wash.

Edit: I should say you won't have Bowen or Finley's salary in 2010 and you need to fill the roster - 5.8 mil isn't expensive

[angelbelow]

We need a big. What is the point of trading Bonner (a big) and screwing up 2010.

nice avy. thats my favorite character.

[intlspurshk]

SPURS have too many limitations when we talking about trade
1st is to keep 2010 plan intact
2nd is to keep salaries below lux tax threhold
3rd is to keep big four in the team to demonstrate loyalty and maintain advantage in playoff experience and chemisry
On top of these objectives, some fans also want to keep GH, Mason, Splitter, Hairston, Gist for future development.

That leaves Bonner, JV, Thomas, Ian, Udoka, Oberto, and 2nd round rights who don't seem to be qualified for NBA games yet.

I don't see how SPURS can improve with the above assets and keep the objectives. Even some teams want cap space, the SPURS may not trade with them as it would mean taking long term contract.

There is no help from D league. So, SPURS have to get upgrade from draft but it also makes no sense to tank for this year.

I see SPURS may not be able to get past the top tier elite teams unless they give up some objectives.