Reply With Quote
Warriors played some good defense in this game. That's not a joke either.
giving the spurs some room another chance for the spurs to get another game lead tommorow
and ill be there
Warriors played some good defense in this game. That's not a joke either.
89-84 5.3 left
west looks like hes going to cry
warriors win !
What do you know. West comes back in the lineup and the offense goes stagnant all of a sudden. Not only does West shoot a terrible percentage, but Peja has a terrible game, Butler and Posey aren't factors offensively. We need to figure out how to incorporate West in the offense without leaving everyone else stagnant.
The Spurs better be ready tomorrow!
The Hornets will be mad!!!!
Look at how the NBA is....
Golden State loses in Dallas by 24 points on Wed and then wins in New Orleans by 4 tonight!!
No way. Our offense stinks right now with West back. Peja becomes a non-factor when the offense is run through West. You guys will win pretty easily if we don't figure out how to play with West and Peja together.The Spurs better be ready tomorrow!
The Hornets will be mad!!!!
Look at how the NBA is....
Golden State loses in Dallas by 24 points on Wed and then wins in New Orleans by 4 tonight!!
Looked like a case of the Hornets looking ahead . . .
I was really high when I was me but is it me or was Julian Wright very productive, drew a few charges, forced a few turnovers, hit some shots.
Good job Warriors!!! (damn still no crazy in game pics)
More than anything.. I am looking forward to John Hollinger's playoff odds and the odd expression on his face when he reminisces about this week.
WHy you guys hating on Hollinger, he loved the Spurs in 2007 (when the Spurs were actually elite).
Its not about "hating" Hollinger. Its about his stubborn reliance on the "stats-alone" methodology. Not everything is measured in terms of numbers. Say, people with heart. They aren't measured by pulse rates or heart beats. Like the Spurs.
Hollinger got it wrong by saying that Spurs will finish with a record of 47-35 over the season. As things stand, they would have to go 16-21 to get to that milestone. Obviously, his number crunchers are wrong and that means his methodology is flawed.
The Rodeo Trip is still on and the Spurs might trip now and then; that doesn't mean that they will roll over owing to the schedule - something that Hollinger was hinting. It is not about "disrespect", but what else could it be if Hollinger continues to put up the Spurs below the 76ers in his "power" rankings?
? soooo brent barry puts us on that elite level? dumb.
He doesn't do anything, his software does it. He could care less because he thinks his software is impeccable -it isn't but that doesn't mean he has anything to do with how the software ranks the Spurs.
Obviously he fed in the logic for the software, didn't he? Otherwise it wouldn't be "his software", would it?
The point is that Hollinger's logic is flawed and ergo, so are his s/w's findings. Didn't someone say Humint > Machine Intelligence? Was it CIA Pop?
Yeah...West is the reason ya'll lost. He's a bum and if I were ya'll I'd trade him ASAP.
That's my main man Stephen Jackson showing it how it's done!
jax 15-6-7...nice
jackson played nice.
Are you still high or are you someone else now?
The Warriors really should've won by a lot more. They missed so many open shots (a lot of threes). Still, tonight will be a tough game.
Hollinger's formula has the Celtics , Magic Cavs and Lakers as the top 4. Dont see how there's any argument there.
Spurs are 8th, and if they beat the Hornets by a decent margin (4+ points) they'll probably be ranked 7th.
That's what I thought too.
We didn't look ahead against the Warriors. We played solid defense. We were just lost offensively. Guys were forced to stand around watching West be Karl Malone. The offense became stagnant. The Warriors are a terrible team. We beat much better teams in Philly and Denver easily this week without West, but once he came back, the offense revolved around him and his 5-17 shooting.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
