Reply With Quote
Yeah, that's it.
I wouldn't know.
But I notice you didn't answer my question. Do you have a answer, or do you consider the question itself misguided?
I like these quotes from the paper I cited:
Yeah, that's it.
I wouldn't know.
But I notice you didn't answer my question. Do you have a answer, or do you consider the question itself misguided?
I didn't answer your question because it was based on a false premise.
Gotcha. That's an answer. You refuse to answer mine.
Thanks, I guess.
the right wing is composed of some of the most ignorant s in the nation, while they think whatever they say has substance the rest of us just laugh on the inside as they run around circles. No wonder your party is in shambles and the laughing stock of the nation.
This is coming from from an independent, both parties suck but i prefer the lesser of 2 evils.
Watching Wild Cobra shows how flawed their logic really is.
I would say there's plenty of fail to go around, and no need to pick on such an easy target. There's no valor in it.
I should remember that sometimes.
WTF are you talking about? This issue has nothing to do with being conservative or liberal.
This topic is actually one of WC's stronger ones. He misuses his reason just like he does everywhere else, but his discourse on GW is at least reason-based, and is even mildly persuasive in spots.
Some of the stuff he suggests about solar activity and soot seem plausible to me.
What the are you talkign about? You and Wild Cobra are the only ones that have posted Global warming articles!
The search function is your friend.
This is not exactly right, and I don't know how much it's safe to assume about DarrinS's political orientation. Even if you are right about it, his views on science *may not* be ideologically derived.
FWIW sook, where DarrinS is concerned it seems there's an honest disagreement about the science.
Where WC is concerned, the disagreement strikes me as basically dishonest, but even WC occasionally turns up a topical nugget. Like the soot thing.
You're a ing idiot.
I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN!
Do a little fact finding and you will discover they are, without doubt, the primary reasons we have been warming.
Can you explain why any point I bring up on the issue is dishonest?
That. I'd like to see!
I think your best point was how the greenhouse effect of C02 is logarithmic. That pretty much ends the debate, IMO. You should post that graph again.
WC, why don't you respond to what I posted on page 1?
Because I haven't read all the material involved yet for one. I don't know if your article is a correct assessment or not. Mainly because it came from you, and I didn't know how much of the words were yours until I went to the link.
Admit it, WC: you do play one on ST.
I don't think these liberals understand math.
It the way you argue that's dishonest.
Example please.
Yet you can say with certainty that what this man says is correct?
It seems to beI don't know if your article is a correct assessment or not.
That's funny Mr. RobotfixerMainly because it came from you
None of them. So respond.and I didn't know how much of the words were yours until I went to the link.
You could have just said there's support for the hypotheses. Instead, you claim there's no doubt. Your hypotheses are not even theories yet, and you're claiming they're already proven.
That's an example of dishonesty.
Stop being dishonest. Where did I say that?
I rarely agree with everything someone says.
Yes, it sounds good. For all I know, the rebuttal is taking things out of context. I'm not convinced just because something sounds good. I'm sorry you are.
If I have time to absorb what's being said on the heat equations.
Who's being dishonest now? I never said you agreed with everything he said. I said you though he was correct without having read all of the information. Am I wrong?
Yes, it sounds good. For all I know, the rebuttal is taking things out of context. I'm not convinced just because something sounds good. I'm sorry you are.that's hilarious coming from you
Only if it doesn't conflict with your robot repairs.If I have time to absorb what's being said on the heat equations.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions