I just trade Bruce Bowen for Kevin Durant

[IcemanCometh]

On Espn's Trade Machine. I can do it why can't the front office? Jesus they suck I should be in charge, make the trade happen Pop!

[timvp]

lol, ut

[EricB]

[EricB]

Over under on how many posts it will take before someone takes this seriously?

[024]

holy if it can be done on the trade machine then it must be possible. wtf why won't the spurs do it? are they stupid or something?

[smeagol]

On Espn's Trade Machine. I can do it why can't the front office? Jesus they suck I should be in charge, make the trade happen Pop!

You have not missed a beat . . .

[hater]

well they gave us KT for free

[EricB]

holy if it can be done on the trade machine then it must be possible. wtf why won't the spurs do it? are they stupid or something?

That was quick...

[024]

That was quick...

internet is not very good at projecting sarcasm. you really think i took that seriously?

[EricB]

internet is not very good at projecting sarcasm. you really think i took that seriously?

The sarcasm of thinking the OP's sarcasm is real is not very good.

[Tully365]

EricB falls into his own trap.... now, that's funny.

[StoneBuddha]

On Espn's Trade Machine. I can do it why can't the front office? Jesus they suck I should be in charge, make the trade happen Pop!

I wouldn't do it. Who would guard Kobe then? We'd have to try and outscore them and that's not Spurs basketball.

[EricB]

EricB falls into his own trap.... now, that's funny.

How so?

It was sarcasm in reaction to thinking the OP was serious.

[SenorSpur]

[Tully365]

How so?

It was sarcasm in reaction to thinking the OP was serious.

Poster 024 was being sarcastic, just as the OP was being sarcastic. You posted first asking who would be the first (presumably gullible) person to respond to the OP seriously, and then posted seriously to 024's post, which was written in the same spirit of sarcasm. Thus.. you fell into your own trap. So the answer to your original question is T Par..., er, EricB.

[Ed Helicopter Jones]

IcemanCometh.









Check.

[SpursWoman]

@ Iceman.

[DAF86]

EricB falls into his own trap.... now, that's funny.

Self

[YoMamaIsCallin]

I'm a subs ute for another guy
I look pretty tall but my heels are high
The simple things you see are all complicated
I look pretty young but I'm just backdated

--Pete Townshend

[InK]

On Espn's Trade Machine. I can do it why can't the front office? Jesus they suck I should be in charge, make the trade happen Pop!

Lmfao, finally a good trade thread.

[Dex]

Poster 024 was being sarcastic, just as the OP was being sarcastic. You posted first asking who would be the first (presumably gullible) person to respond to the OP seriously, and then posted seriously to 024's post, which was written in the same spirit of sarcasm. Thus.. you fell into your own trap. So the answer to your original question is T Par..., er, EricB.

I think I need a diagram for this post.

[Thompson]

Poster 024 was being sarcastic, just as the OP was being sarcastic. You posted first asking who would be the first (presumably gullible) person to respond to the OP seriously, and then posted seriously to 024's post, which was written in the same spirit of sarcasm. Thus.. you fell into your own trap. So the answer to your original question is T Par..., er, EricB.

Unless EricB realized poster 024 was not seriously failing to comprehend the sarcasm of the OP, and himself responded sarcastically that poster 024 had fallen into the trap, knowing full well he hadn't.

[InK]

Unless EricB realized poster 024 was not seriously failing to comprehend the sarcasm of the OP, and himself responded sarcastically that poster 024 had fallen into the trap, knowing full well he hadn't.

But what if Trully was beeing sarcastic as well, while knowing some other guy would come in and point at the obvious mistake?!? Then that would mean that your the first guy who failed at this thread? Or were u beeing sarcastic in a quadruple sarcasm loop as well??!? Im just kidding, or am i.

[Tully365]

But what if Trully was beeing sarcastic as well, while knowing some other guy would come in and point at the obvious mistake?!? Then that would mean that your the first guy who failed at this thread? Or were u beeing sarcastic in a quadruple sarcasm loop as well??!? Im just kidding, or am i.

Are you Thomas Pynchon?!

[024]

Poster 024 was being sarcastic, just as the OP was being sarcastic. You posted first asking who would be the first (presumably gullible) person to respond to the OP seriously, and then posted seriously to 024's post, which was written in the same spirit of sarcasm. Thus.. you fell into your own trap. So the answer to your original question is T Par..., er, EricB.

i can clear this up. tully is correct, i was following the OP's sarcasm.