With all these great, close games...

[Whisky Dog]

Especially on national tv, are the Spurs no longer considered boring?

[InK]

That ll allways be a given.

[honestfool84]

i wonder if the spurs got kobe/lebron/dwade/dhoward, would they still be considered boring?

[honestfool84]

(just wondering, not expecting the spurs to get any of them (except HOPING for dhoward in '10)

[ElNono]

Who cares, really? I mean, as a Spurs fan I prefer they blow the game open in the 3rd and sit down our best players in the 4th. I don't really care what anybody else thinks...
It's not a popularity contest after all...

[DeadlyDynasty]

Roger Mason and some of the younger guys make the Spurs a better watch. Incidentally, their declining defense this year also has made them kinder to the eye. I'm so used to 91-81 games w/ a bunch of flops and fouls and low shooting percentages. This year the Spurs are more exciting w/ the close games and youth injection

[cool hand]

Especially on national tv, are the Spurs no longer considered boring?

its not the team that is boring.


its the national interest in a small south Texas town that makes us boring.

[baseline bum]

i wonder if the spurs got kobe/lebron/dwade/dhoward, would they still be considered boring?

You already know the answer to that; we had Robinson and people still called the Spurs boring.

[exstatic]

(just wondering, not expecting the spurs to get any of them (except HOPING for dhoward in '10)

I guess I have to be the one to break it to you: Howard extended with the Magic.

[ManuTP9]

its not the team that is boring.


its the national interest in a small south Texas town that makes us boring.

maybe because our jersey colors our bland?