Democrats in Congress will be Demonrats!

[Blake]

demonrats?

oh.....I see what you did there.....

[Wild Cobra]

That is the definition of intellectual dishonesty. One does not withold information simply because it makes your case look bad.

I have higher priorities than beating up on the underdog. I'm sorry, I hated bullies throughout school and I hate them now.

You don't fight lies with half-truths.

What half truths? The majority of this bailout is spending that will hurt us rather than help. Just because I don't bash the underdog doesn't make it a half-truth when I bash the party of demons.

Personally, I think the above statement is simply your attempt to not admit that you have no clue what kinds of earmarks were included in spending bills by Republicans over the last 8 years, and didn't want to admit I was right about never getting that information from the news sources you read/hear. The fact that it says more about you than you realize is simply icing on the cake.

I don't follow earmarks and I know there is little I can do about them. Not my major concern at the moment. I do disagree with anything not part of the scope and purpose of a bill to be inserted and I believe all items should be separately voted on by merit. I simply don't expect either part to change their elitist at ude.

Isn't this the party however that promised to stop earmarks?

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php? le=Earmarks

Have at. Prove to us that you aren't a hack, and tell me specifically what Republican introduced an earmark that you didn't like. THere are lots to choose from, so someone who is a genius of your caliber shouldn't have a hard time finding one.

Sorry, I have better things to do. If you sourced a site that breaks them all out allot better, I might take you up on it.

That is, unless honesty isn't something you strive for, in which case, feel free to ignore my request, and re-state how bad Democrats are. I promise not to be disappointed, as I don't expect much from you to begin with.

You can either believe me or not. That's you choice. My choice is not to spend more time looking things up that are low priority to me.

[Wild Cobra]

demonrats?

oh.....I see what you did there.....

Yep.

Demonrats are the political ones. Demoncraps are the reporters who eat and regurgitate their to us, and lib s are those drinking their kool-aid.

[Shastafarian]

He's too busy playing with his robot friends.

[George Gervin's Afro]

Yep.

Demonrats are the political ones. Demoncraps are the reporters who eat and regurgitate their to us, and lib s are those drinking their kool-aid.

Would another unecessary war make you happy?

[Blake]

Yep.

Demonrats are the political ones. Demoncraps are the reporters who eat and regurgitate their to us, and lib s are those drinking their kool-aid.

demoncraps?

oh......I see what you did there.....

[Oh, Gee!!]

demoncraps?

oh......I see what you did there.....

he's quite the wordsmith

[George Gervin's Afro]

he's quite the wordsmith

Who is taken out of context quite regularly.

[ChumpDumper]

Don't even worry about that argument. Funny how you only argue weak points, always shifting back to them avoiding other arguments. ACORN is a left wing partisan group, and therefore, the majority has no right to give tax payer dollars to them. If they wish to do so, they should give equal money to right wing groups.

How would the lefties feel about that?

Personally, I don't like either option. Let ACORN stand on their own, with private donations.

So by trying to weasel out of explaining why ACORN is some kind of dangerous liberal conspiracy, you admit you have no evidence whatsoever of any fraudulent votes resulting from ACORN's activities.

One can only conclude you see voter registration and voting as bad things.

You are an enemy of democracy.

[RandomGuy]

I have higher priorities than beating up on the underdog. I'm sorry, I hated bullies throughout school and I hate them now.

What half truths? The majority of this bailout is spending that will hurt us rather than help. Just because I don't bash the underdog doesn't make it a half-truth when I bash the party of demons.

I don't follow earmarks and I know there is little I can do about them. Not my major concern at the moment. I do disagree with anything not part of the scope and purpose of a bill to be inserted and I believe all items should be separately voted on by merit. I simply don't expect either part to change their elitist at ude.

Isn't this the party however that promised to stop earmarks?

Sorry, I have better things to do. If you sourced a site that breaks them all out allot better, I might take you up on it.

You can either believe me or not. That's you choice. My choice is not to spend more time looking things up that are low priority to me.

Too bad part of your self learning wasn't directed into developing critical thinking skills.

Just because someone is "an underdog" doesn't absolve you from telling the full truth as you know it.

Playing the character of a Political Hack, however, does. You have/had a choice, Hackdom, or intellectual honesty.

That is why you fail, padawan.