Reply With Quote
Local man takes huge dump, does not flush down toilet
Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse
Giant flames engulf every floor of 44-story building and it remains standing, yet limited fires across just 8 floors of WTC 7 brought down building within 7 seconds on 9/11. How can NIST’s “new phenomenon” explain this one?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/fire-con...-collapse.html
I guess steel buildings in China don't get "thermal expansion" like they do here, eh?
Local man takes huge dump, does not flush down toilet
another article from prisonplanet?
yay!
You made assumptions about the construction of the building that were in no news article.
When will you learn that lying doesn't help your cause?
The Chinese use special anti-thermal action beams for construction!
Last edited by Galileo; 02-09-2009 at 04:21 PM.
I figured it out.
The Chinese didn't put a diesel tank on the 5th floor!
just curious, who was behind WTC7 falling down?
I think the people behind WTC 7 got out of the way before it fell.
funny.
who was behind the plans to drop the building?
The terrorists!
well that was easier than I thought.
Why did WTC7 need to be destroyed?
In other news, the building didn't have debris from the next door 110 foot towers hitting it when they collapsed.
It didn't, but you can't suggest that towers one and two were brought down in a controlled demolition if you acknowledge that tower seven collapsed within its own footprint, because it kills the conspiracy theory that it's impossible for a building to collapse that way if it happened the same day right across the street.
You talking about the building in China. No, it didn't fall. Shoulda, though.In other news, the building didn't have debris from the next door 110 foot towers hitting it when they collapsed.
It shoulda had debris from two 110 story buildings hit it?
You fail to make sense.
Because the terrorists are evil and they hate America.
So you have no valid reason.
Fair enough.
so the debris knocked over WTC 7? It wasn't thermal expansion anymore?
It certainly didn't help. Without the debris, there are no fires. Without the fires....
Now why did the people you think brought down WTC7 brought down WTC7?
I think its safe to assume that more than one thing could contribute to a building falling down that by themselves alone may not be sufficient.
It's also safe to assume that buildings built after the collapse of WTC7 would not be built like WTC7.
why's that? You think people who build skyscrapers actually pay attention to NIST's WTC 7 bull .
Yes. Very much so.
If you can give me some quotes from people who build skyscrapers that say they regularly ignore the NIST, I would be happy to read them.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
