Reply With Quote
Before you can criticize the NIST report, you need to be able to understand it.
You aren't there yet.
give me an example of something built with non-conducting steel.
You aren't there yet.
Galileo is an expert in physics.
You aren't there yet.
He was, but you are not.
I AM GALILEO!
Silly fonts do not make it so.
There were twin towers that collapsed across the street from the building in China, too? Creepy.
Was the building in China completed in 1979 and full of carpet, office funiture, papers, walls, doors, etc? Oh wait, no it wasn't completed yet and was basically hollow empty rooms with concrete and treated steel.
still waiting for real motive behind the controlled demolition.....
or does motive not matter to you conspiracy hacks?
Because, as we all know, all steel framed buildings are so alike, and all fires are so alike that we can easily compare them as being completely interchangible.
If one burns but does not fall down, it logically follows that no steel-framed building will ever fall down, even if it is actually framed in concrete and not steel. Remember not to look too closely at the specific buildings being compared and try not to notice the concrete holding a good portion of either building up.
So therefore any steel building that burns and falls down must be victim of an evil conspircacy.
How could I have not seen this leap of logic before?
Actually, motive is ALL they have. That's why they get into absurd conspiracy theories . . . because "they" wanted it to happen.
no motive needs to be alleged or proven to gain a conviction in American courts. Ice-cold killers kill just for the heck of it.
This isn't a court, although it's worth noting that nothing you have ever posted would fly in a real trial.
Why would anyone want to destroy WTC7?
That's not nescessasry to prove that WTC 7 was blown up. I don't care why the derangerd killers did it.
so you are saying that terrorists were the ones that got WTC 7 to free fall?
I just wanna be clear before I call you an idiot for no reason.
Enron. D'uh.
I do.
Nobody was killed in the WTC7 collapse, so why destroy it?
Terrorists did it.
The same terrorists also blew up the Twin Towers, dufus.
And who would that be?
and killed a bunch of people and spreading fear and so on and so on
please explain how terrorists that are smart enough to wire and detonate an entire building were too stupid to figure out to blow it before all the people left the area?
I'll go ahead and answer for you:
you don't have a clue because you obviously don't realize just what it would take to wire and blow up a building like that with nobody noticing.
you are an idiot.
Larry Silverstein.
You're the idiot.
The terrorists are Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Giuliani, and Silverstein.
if this were a real court, the judge would tell you to hurry the fock up, show your evidence and make your focking conclusion.
No they flew planes into those buildings, and their reasons for doing so are well-known.
Why would anyone want to destroy WTC7?
which Bush? Marvin or W?
No, outside of you, I think we all agree that you're the idiot.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions