Reply With Quote
Who are "they"? And who hijacked the planes? Silverstein, Giuliani, Bush . . . who else?
Please fill in the blanks, and don't use the passive voice.
We've already gone over this before.
FL93 was supposed to fly into WTC 7, as Giuliani has mentioned.
But FL93 got stuck in the runway for 43 minutes. By the time it was hijacked, it was too late to fly back to NYC, so it was shot down.
So we've got WTC 7 just sitting there loaded with explosives. They blew it up at dusk, before it was too dark to see the light flashes.
Who are "they"? And who hijacked the planes? Silverstein, Giuliani, Bush . . . who else?
Please fill in the blanks, and don't use the passive voice.
Rudy never mentioned this.
Silent, hush-a-boom explosions no one heard.But FL93 got stuck in the runway for 43 minutes. By the time it was hijacked, it was too late to fly back to NYC, so it was shot down.
So we've got WTC 7 just sitting there loaded with explosives. They blew it up at dusk, before it was too dark to see the light flashes.
Or saw.
Or planted.
9iu11iani did mention it. He said he didn't go to WTC 7 because another plane was heading towards it.
No he didn't.
He did. Look it up, its in the Terror Timeline.
Pretty much everyone thought their tall building might get hit by a plane on 9/11. WTC 7 was evacuated because it made sense to evacuate it.
Now why would anyone want to destroy WTC7?
Here's a partial list of other buildings evacuated on 9/11.
* the United Nations headquarters in New York City
* the Sears Tower in Chicago
* several skyscrapers in downtown Houston
* the Transamerica building in San Francisco
* the Renaissance Center in Detroit
* in London, Canary Wharf tower and the Stock Exchange Tower
* the Empire State Building
Disneyland was also closed. So now we know that Mickey Mouse was in on it too!
Giuliani wasn't in WTC 7.
He said he didn't go to WTC 7 because a third plane [FL93] was headed towards it.
He said he was told a plane might be headed toward it.
All the other buildings listed thought that planes might be headed toward them as well.
Again, why would anyone want to destroy WTC7?
Giuliani was supposed to go to the 23rd floor of WTC 7, to the OEMEOC.
He didn't go there because a third plane was headed towards it. You are just monkeying around with semantics because I caught you in another lie.
Guiliani went to a different building instead, that didn't have a plane flying towards it.
He was told another hijacked plane might be flying towards New York. The people in Washington thought another plane might be headed there. The Capitol and White House were evacuated.
He went to a mobile command center -- pretty much an armored bus. Nobody really wanted to be in any tall buildings that day, as the list above shows.Guiliani went to a different building instead, that didn't have a plane flying towards it.
This was AFTER both the Twin Towers had been hit. The third plane was supposed to be FL93. It never made it.
No duh. Had WTC been evacuated at 6 AM, now that would have been su ious.No evidence supporting its target was WTC7. None whatsoever.The third plane was supposed to be FL93.
Which brings us back to the original question:
Why would anyone want to destroy WTC7?
What exactly were they supposed to do with a building filled to the hilt with explosives? Just leave it sit there? Don't you think somebody would have found them?
There were no explosives planted in WTC7.
Yes there were. There is video of it being blown up.
No there isn't.
Nor was there any trace of explosives at the site.
Nor was there any report of an explosion at the time of collapse.
Nor was there, as your continued evasion of the question shows, any reason to destroy WTC7.
There was a lot of evidence of explosives found, including molton steel, molton metal, thermal hotspots, partially evaporated steel, and bizarre & exotic chemicals.
To go with the evidence of explosives, there are many witnesses who heard explosions.
There would have been more evidence found, but all the steel was shipped to Asia before it could be tested.
There is also a witness who heard a countdown before it fell.
You are in a state of denial.
That's evidence of a fire. No evidence of explosives.
No one reported any explosions right before the collapse.To go with the evidence of explosives, there are many witnesses who heard explosions.
The steel was inspected on site.There would have been more evidence found, but all the steel was shipped to Asia before it could be tested.
Just one?There is also a witness who heard a countdown before it fell.
You have denied answering a simple question for pages now:You are in a state of denial.
Why would anyone want to bring down WTC7?
Be honest, who here actually believes the 9/11 report in its entirety?
What parts do you not believe?
Page and paragraph numbers are requested.
I can find the odd erroneous detail, but it is not an engineering report.
are you waiting for the insurance money motive?
I know I am....
cmon Gal, answer the question
lemme guess too.....
Silverstein said "pull it" and that's all the proof you need, right?
I don't buy that one. I'm skeptical of conspiracy theories like that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions