Reply With Quote
No need for that here. It's amazing that something like that can cause you to make a post like that. That's horrible.
Anyways, Oberto, Udoka, Bowen(Yes, I said it), and Splitter's rights need to go.
Ah the new guy coming in telling everyone how to think.
So Kurt Thomas has been great lately, so he needs to go, genius.
Finley has been solid all year, needs to go.
Genius.
Absolute genius.
No need for that here. It's amazing that something like that can cause you to make a post like that. That's horrible.
Anyways, Oberto, Udoka, Bowen(Yes, I said it), and Splitter's rights need to go.
LOL since your smack talk is pretty bad itself and seemingly you don't watch much ball, I'll try to explain why you don't make sense.
First of all you say we need a big man who can rebound, defend and take space, then you say you want to get rid of Kurt Thomas... who do you think we can get then? Dwight Howard for Vaughn?
Then you say we need a good center and rookies on the bench to win it all. Name the last team who has won a championship with a bench of rookies or inexperienced players.
The Spurs have invested too much in Ian to let him go just because he's had an injury plagued year. After all he's played only 7 NBA games and is still 21. Also, even if the Spurs give up on him, his trade value is 0 right now.
Bruce Bowen stays no matter what, it's not even worth explaining why.
Vaughn is the best 3rd string PG you'll find right now, especially considering his mentorship. He's gonna be a coach someday and he's very valuable to the team right now. Next year he'll probably be an assistant somewhere, but he's valuable to the Spurs right now.
Pop doesn't make too many roster changes, nor he should. This is how you preserve a championship contender for 11 years in a row, rather than making constand overhauls like the Warriors for example. There is nothing logical from a basketball point of view that would suggest that Pop would certainly decide to change his methods in his 13th NBA season and jeopardize Duncan's last 3/4 seasons. We need to win right now, that's why we're being run in such a conservative manner. And that's how it's supposed to be.
The threadstarter should go.
The team needs help in the frontcourt it can't be stated enough. In a 7 game series vs. LA or The Celtics we could not win with this lineup. Us winning with Bonner at Center is fantasy basketball. Tim Duncan's final years have to be good ones, thats why either before the deadline or this summer a good big next to Duncan will be emerge.
So basically keep the Big 3, Hill, KT, Bruce, Money, Ian, Malik, and maybe Matt.
Amen...trade everyone else for a pick or at least sumthin
How this thread is salvaged by the moderator and mine is deleted is beyond me. Pop is "going with what he's got" so get over it. Were a talented team.
Guess why genius...
There's already more than enough useless trade thread around.
If each and every new user post a thread about his own thoughts the board is unreadable.
+1
I have some doubts about KT, mainly because we need someone big, anyhow he made his shots and plays here and there, which is useful.
You guys are forgetting about Hairston!
Great point. What the signing of Mason and drafting of Hill this year have proven (once again) is that RC and Pop are better at this than every single member of spurstalk! Shocking!
I like what you did. This is a place of discussion, not insults. Alot of people seem to forget that.
Pop is going with what he's got? Are you sure about that? If you think the spurs can beat the lakers and celtics in a seven game series your crazy, Even Pop stated that his team can't beat the lakers and celtics in a seven game series.
thats the worst trade ive evwer seen! lol tony was top 3 in points in the pain a few years ago! when gregoden can top that letmeknow! and u have no idea hoqw hard it is to come uipon a point guard of tony parkers calibur!
If not why aren't they? The Knicks are willing to trade their bigger contracts to clear up room and David Lee's contract isn't nearly as big as some of the other rumors we have heard such as VC, Sheed, Brad Miller etc. Why the can't this happen?
Because David Lee is actually wanted in NY, they just don't see him signing there in the summer. He is also younger and can actually improve his game.
Something called "needing a trade chip that the Knicks want"
The Knicks aren't gonna give him up for peanuts.
We could S&T Marbury. I hear he's popular in New York these days.
I'm not sure that's correct. What I have heard is that Lee is available, but if you want him, you MUST take Eddie Curry, and that contract IS toxic.
S&T a player that isn't a free agent?
I'm all ears.
I've heard they've offered him contract extension but it turned it down. He expects somewhere in the 10 mil range, which I doubt he can get but you never know with random teams throwing away money.
The Curry thing is correct. I'm sure they'd give up anything to give up that walking McDonalds.
Eddie Curry won't ever play a game in the NBA again.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
