Reply With Quote
No. Tim Duncan is The San Antonio Spurs.
I was leaning yes for Lebron no for Howard when I read this post. I'm fully in the no camp now.
No. Tim Duncan is The San Antonio Spurs.
if the spurs trade Duncan on his final year in the league, you can start calling the team the San Antonio INGRATES.
They're a good team with a few players doing things that they don't normally do......
Kinda reminds me of the Celtics last year.
No to the Duncan for whoever stuff
nyet
No...oh wait....uh no.....wait wait wait....uhmm.....no..........NO!
For both, yes.
NO ,especially DH
DUNCAN is a sign of San Antonio !
On the other hand, as good as he is, i don't see the cavs or the magic giving up james or howard for timmy
Maybe it's a little less impossible with the cavs, because of all the 2010 thing
if you trade tim duncan, the mexicans will invade texas....
tim duncan texas ranger, his got your back
no. absolutely not.
and your thread still sucks
Secondly, evidently all these people are not saying no. How many yes's do you need before you realize your opinion is not the opinion of everyone.followed right away by 7 nos in a row.
no, it's notWhat is the big deal about proposing a hypothetical question? It is just interesting discussion.
nobody is discussing this but you.If you do not like it, move along and do not post. It will eventually fall off the page. But if some like to discuss things, why do you hate on it and act like an emo d-bag?
This thread was flaming before you thought of it.
You are talking about trading the greatest Spur of all time that has won 4 championships for this city.
Get the f out of here with this crap.
it depends what you're looking for...
After a decade of success, Duncan IS the Spurs. Therefore, spurs fans would never want to see him in an other uniform, no matter what it takes.
But from a rational point of view, a 32 years old TD for a 24 years old LBJ...... , if you want to contend for the next decade, this is a no brainer
and your thread still sucks
no, it's not
nobody is discussing this but you.
This thread was flaming before you thought of it.
You are talking about trading the greatest Spur of all time that has won 4 championships for this city.
Get the f out of here with this crap.If you don't care about this rumor, why do you keep posting in the thread?
And yes, it's been mentioned throughout this thread that the Spurs would have to include much more to get Rasheed (probably Manu) or a third team be involved and multiple other players. You aren't making any revelations by coming into a thread bashing it about how it's wasting your time and won't happen. No one is saying it WILL happen. It's just a discussion of a rumor. I don't get how it's bothering you so much.Multiple people are discussing this, hence the other posters (including yourself) that keep this thread at the top of the page.Why are you here? This rumor is wasting your time. Move along
Joke of a human.
If I was the GM I would have to ask Duncan how he feels about it. I'd do it only if he wanted to go.
For Lebron, yes
For Howard, not so sure I would.
did Kori tell that to you?
Mulitple posts saying "no" does not equal a "discussion". This isn't a rumor thread and I never said you are wasting anyone's time.
What I'm saying is that you almost deserve to get pinked for coming on a Spurs board and suggesting that the Spurs should trade the greatest Spur and greatest power forward of all time who is still in his prime if they get the chance for one of two unproven commodities.
You're either an idiot or a troll. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you are just being an idiot.
Joke of a human.
I wouldnt trade Tim for anybody in the NBA. Are LBJ or Kobe better players? Maybe at their positions. Is DH a better big man than Tim? I dont think so right now. Tim has paid his dues for this franchise and deserves to retire a Spur, just like David Robinson.
Kori said that to another d-bag such as yourself who keeps posting in threads "that in their minds suck". You keep self owning. Where did I suggest that the Spurs should trade Duncan for what you call "unproven commodities"?did Kori tell that to you?
Mulitple posts saying "no" does not equal a "discussion". This isn't a rumor thread and I never said you are wasting anyone's time.
What I'm saying is that you almost deserve to get pinked for coming on a Spurs board and suggesting that the Spurs should trade the greatest Spur and greatest power forward of all time who is still in his prime if they get the chance for one of two unproven commodities.
You're either an idiot or a troll. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you are just being an idiot.
You keep pointing to the people who said "no", but there were some people who said yes, so shhhhhh. Let us who want to discuss things (even hypothetically) about the Spurs do so. Move along kid.
The thread is led "hypothetical question", not "Spurs should trade Duncan". I am assuming you can read, so it must be a comprehension problem. How can someone who has less post than me suggest that I should be pinked? Your life should be pinked, because you are a joke of a human.
Last edited by DPG21920; 02-13-2009 at 12:20 PM.
No.
I think she was talking to posters like you that flat out called that other dude a "liar" when all he was doing was reporting what he heard on the radio.
I don't think you know what self owning means.You keep self owning. Where did I suggest that the Spurs should trade Duncan for what you call "unproven commodities"?
Neither Dwight nor LBJ have won any rings means "unproven commodities" for the Spurs. You want to trade the one of the "proven" top ten players of all time who is currently in his prime for either one.
self owned, dumbass.
Nobody is discussing anything with you except me and I'm discussing with you how stupid you are for want to trade Duncan for LBJ or Howard.You keep pointing to the people who said "no", but there were some people who said yes, so shhhhhh. Let us who want to discuss things (even hypothetically) about the Spurs do so. Move along kid.
Move along, dip .
this thread should be led "here's a stupid question" and you yourself said the Spurs should trade Duncan right now if they could.The thread is led "hypothetical question", not "Spurs should trade Duncan".
you can't write.I am assuming you can read, so it must be a comprehension problem.
How can someone who has less post than me suggest that I should be pinked?
that means mouse is a genius and must have been right all along about 9/11.
Your life should be pinked, because you are a joke of a human.
weak
shhhhh.I think she was talking to posters like you that flat out called that other dude a "liar" when all he was doing was reporting what he heard on the radio.
I don't think you know what self owning means.
Neither Dwight nor LBJ have won any rings means "unproven commodities" for the Spurs. You want to trade the one of the "proven" top ten players of all time who is currently in his prime for either one.
self owned, dumbass.
Nobody is discussing anything with you except me and I'm discussing with you how stupid you are for want to trade Duncan for LBJ or Howard.
Move along, dip .
this thread should be led "here's a stupid question" and you yourself said the Spurs should trade Duncan right now if they could.
you can't write.
that means mouse is a genius and must have been right all along about 9/11.
weak
If I am so dumb, where were you to rip on all the other conversations I have been a part of? Point is, to come in an act like an emo d-bag because you personally do not like a thread makes youweak.
As already explained to you, if you don't like it, do not post. Just move along. No need to be an a-hole and ruin the thread. If everyone else is in agreement, then the thread will fall off the page.
So once again, shhhhhhh.
No.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
