Except there were, in and around WTC7.
No one.
That was easy.
For these reasons I made the decision (without consulting the owner, the mayor or anyone else - as ranking fire officer, that decision was my responsibility) to clear a collapse zone surrounding the building and to stop all activity within that zone. Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed.
Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit.
Regards, Dan Nigro
Chief of Department FDNY (retired) Source
For these reasons I made the decision (without consulting the owner, the mayor or anyone else - as ranking fire officer, that decision was my responsibility) to clear a collapse zone surrounding the building and to stop all activity within that zone. Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed.
Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit.
Regards, Dan Nigro
Chief of Department FDNY (retired) Source
If WTC 7 was an engineered collapse for safety reasons, why would that be a conspiracy? Its not a crime and it potentially saved lives.
So you think WTC7 was collapsed for safety reasons?
Well, somebody did say "pull it", but then again, that might have been Nbadan talking to Galileo during their "naughty time".
Its possible. That's what John Kerry thinks.
That wasn't my question.
What do you think?
Unlike the Archie Debunkers, I don't claim to know evrything about 9/11. Rather, I go by the facts.
I'd say it's about 10% likely that WTC 7 was engineered to collapse for safety reasons.
So how did the fire department engineer the collapse of WTC7 for safety reasons?I'd say it's about 10% likely that WTC 7 was engineered to collapse for safety reasons.
Which standard procedure calls for a skyscraper to be intentionally demolished for safety reason within three hours of its being declared unsafe?
Please give us the facts.
The fire department didn't do it.
So how did the fire department engineer the collapse of WTC7 for safety reasons?
Which standard procedure calls for a skyscraper to be intentionally demolished for safety reason within three hours of its being declared unsafe?
Please give us the facts.
So who did?
And how?
Please give us the facts.
The federal terrorists.
So the "federal terrorists" demolished WTC7 for safety reasons and it wasn't a criminal act?
oh stop, I can't (giggle) stand (hahahah) it...
military actions are legal.So the "federal terrorists" demolished WTC7 for safety reasons and it wasn't a criminal act?
So the federal military terrorists demolished it for safety reasons?
I am not a aluminum foil hat wearer but I think this country lies to it's people 24/7
You aren't Laker Lanny either.
Might be the only time you ever speak the truth in a 9/11 topic.
What the is a federal military terrorist?
Chumpy and RandomLie wants truthers to answer questions that have never been investigated at any level...'nough said....
If only those two would post what they really feel.
Plenty of people have said what they believe really happened on 9/11 after extensive investigation -- but you're too much of a coward to do so. It's much easier for you to propagate lies about what has already been investigated and spread innuendo about an alternate theory you will never, ever share -- because deep inside you know it's ridiculous and will be so easily shot down you'll be even more of a laughing stock than you are presently.
Brave, brave Sir Robin....
'nuff said (if you're going to quote Stan Lee, do it right, coward).
uhh yes exactly
and says the 9/11 commission report doesnt mean and nobody should care about it
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
