Total Salaries : Bos = $80 M ; LA = $82 M ; Cle = $90 M ... Spurs = $68 M

[kace]

this guy has a valid point and most of you didn't even understand what he meant.

who said money won le ? who said the most expensive roster is always the best ?

who said the spurs didn't spend their money wisely by finding good players who fit well their system ?

but if the spurs had 12 M more to spend (and didn't care about the tax), would they spend this money stupidly ? wouldn't they be the same good FO but with one more great player to add to the roster ?

Let Pop and RC find a 12 M player and let's see if the team wouldn't be better.

i don't complain about the owner wanting to stay under the cap nor about the current roster but the OP has a valid point.

[K-State Spur]

i don't complain about the owner wanting to stay under the cap nor about the current roster but the OP has a valid point.

spurs are over the cap.

[ducks]

Cleveland is a big market??

get lost troll

[Buddy Holly]

I don't speak about stupid teams.
I speak about Lakers and Celtics.
This topic is about contenders for the 2009 le.
And it is more easy to be a great team when you have $12-14 Mil more.

You're a moron. There's more to the game than total salary. Go back to Spursreport.

[timaios]

You're a moron. There's more to the game than total salary. Go back to Spursreport.

So all you've got, are insults.
You are obviously the most intelligent person here.

I am a moron because i say a team with more money can have more talents.
OK.

[Buddy Holly]

So all you've got, are insults.

How else do you respond to a stupid ass post/thread?

You are obviously the most intelligent person here.

No .

I am a moron because i say a team with more money can have more talents.

Yes. Thanks for playing.

[timaios]

How else do you respond to a stupid ass post/thread?

I don't know...
Maybe with some respect, some class.
But i understand you are not familiar with those concepts.

[kace]

spurs are over the cap.

this year too ?

well, let's say that the owner doesn't want to bee too much over the cap.

but the OP has still a valid point.

[Buddy Holly]

I don't know...
Maybe with some respect, some class.
But i understand you are not familiar with those concepts.

This is a internet sports forum not the dinner table. Man up or GTFO.

[timaios]

This is a internet sports forum not the dinner table. Man up or GTFO.

You are such a great guy.

By the way.

2008/09 max salary cap figure: $58,680,000
2008/09 min salary cap figure: $44,010,000
2008/09 luxury tax threshold: $71,150,000

[Buddy Holly]

You are such a great guy.

Yeah I know. I'm not a fan of people who always state the obvious.

By the way.

2008/09 max salary cap figure: $58,680,000
2008/09 min salary cap figure: $44,010,000
2008/09 luxury tax threshold: $71,150,000

Could care less.

Did you want me to explain something to you?

[lefty]

That's what I call getting the most bang from your buck

[timaios]

Could care less.

Did you want me to explain something to you?

For someone who doesn't care, you post a lot in that thread... and for the "salary cap" part, no it wasn't for you it was for kace.

[Buddy Holly]

For someone who doesn't care, you post a lot in that thread...

I care so little that I actually pretend to care.

and for the "salary cap" part, no it wasn't for you it was for kace.

Well you did a great job of conveying that.