College Sports Thread

[j-6]

You're regressing to the level of the idiots that got the CSF shut down, and frankly, I thought you were better than that.

[tonylongoriafan]

Again tony, you have missed the point. No one is telling you to stop supporting UTSA and no one is telling that you shouldn't do it.

If people want to support UTSA, that is great but some of your fellow supporters crossed the line. If you are not one of them, then you have nothing to worry about. If you are one of them, then you should grow the up.

I am using the word "you" in the general sense, not specifically to you personally.

i get your point. you miss mine.

i would say san antonio HATES utsa, if more than 10% of the population even knew it existed.

this is JUST A FORUM! the imaginary make believe line being crossed here pails in comparison to real life actual disrepect and non support the san antonio community as a whole has shown to the university. so when you say you or them, the way we take it is as US. so with all due respect, if we choose to see your line, we will go right up to it, and yes sometime cross, because, who really cares (did u get it?)

[Dr. Gonzo]

i get your point. you miss mine.

i would say san antonio HATES utsa, if more than 10% of the population even knew it existed.

this is JUST A FORUM! the imaginary make believe line being crossed here pails in comparison to real life actual disrepect and non support the san antonio community as a whole has shown to the university. so when you say you or them, the way we take it is as US. so with all due respect, if we choose to see your line, we will go right up to it, and yes sometime cross, because, who really cares (did u get it?)

And you and your annoying friends, more them than you, are just making it worse for UTSA.

This city love the Longhorns and will always be Longhorn supporters first, regardless of whether UTSA has a football team or not. And I bet you are one of those Longhorn loving SA people that wear the burnt orange gear and make trips to Austin to go check them out. If you love and support your school you should only support them.

[tonylongoriafan]

Its obvious that UTSA topics are annoying the site creator and since your buddies cant follow rules she might start laying the law down. If you have been around here long enough you learn and that you dont with Kori and you shoudlnt want to.

annoying? the trade tony parker threads are annoying. the rasheed wallace vince carter knob slobbing threads are annoying. if i have to go through usc, ou, mma threads, then UTSA talk is relevant.

[samikeyp]

My point was addressing the behavior of some of the UTSA supporters on this message board not real life. The problem is that some people crossed that line and took the internet stuff into their real lives and made it personal, that is where the problem lies and that is what I was addressing.

I doubt all of San Antonio hates UTSA but so what if they do?

Does it really matter what others think? You can't let someone else trash talk affect the way you feel. Trust me, as a Cowboys fan, I know this!

[tonylongoriafan]

And you and your annoying friends, more them than you, are just making it worse for UTSA.

This city love the Longhorns and will always be Longhorn supporters first, regardless of whether UTSA has a football team or not. And I bet you are one of those Longhorn loving SA people that wear the burnt orange gear and make trips to Austin to go check them out. If you love and support your school you should only support them.

i agree with about the longhorns. and i love and support many things.

as far as my allegiances. i have 2 college degrees from 2 different schools. i'm not rich but i do have disposable income. i love sports. so i do go to austin for the sports and the party. i also go to dallas for the same for the cowboys. i make a roady for the spurs (this year h-town next month) but i'll also be there for the SLC tourney with the Runners.

[samikeyp]

The number of threads, IMO, is not annoying. , we endure Capt. Mike's constant OSU threads. Who really wants to see the OSU's "JV girls rodeo won fourth place in the bull jerking off contest but haha! its still better than the Aggrots!" thread? That is why you leave it alone.

Its the content of said threads that is the problem. If you can't take the talk, then don't give it. And the jerkoffs that posted personal stuff online and tracked down people at their jobs obviously can't take it.

You speak of lines being crossed....they crossed a big one.

[tonylongoriafan]

You're regressing to the level of the idiots that got the CSF shut down, and frankly, I thought you were better than that.

if you look at my posts i believe you will find a steady, consistent stream of what i'm saying about UTSA.

[tonylongoriafan]

My point was addressing the behavior of some of the UTSA supporters on this message board not real life. The problem is that some people crossed that line and took the internet stuff into their real lives and made it personal, that is where the problem lies and that is what I was addressing.

I doubt all of San Antonio hates UTSA but so what if they do?

Does it really matter what others think? You can't let someone else trash talk affect the way you feel. Trust me, as a Cowboys fan, I know this!

i got it

people's opinion are just that and don't affect what i think. i was responding to the people getting banned and the suggestion UTSA supporters go elsewhere.

[samikeyp]

i got it

people's opinion are just that and don't affect what i think. i was responding to the people getting banned and the suggestion UTSA supporters go elsewhere.

Those who got banned deserved it. It sucks though because there are legit UTSA fans who got lumped in with those weeds and that is not fair.

[tonylongoriafan]

Those who got banned deserved it. It sucks though because there are legit UTSA fans who got lumped in with those weeds and that is not fair.

i disagree

[samikeyp]

i disagree

Which part?

[leemajors]

Which part?

he doesn't get it. Kori is obviously very patient, since it took this long for them to get banned.

[samikeyp]

he doesn't get it.

I get it, I am just encouraging debate.

(I know you didn't mean me, lee)

[tonylongoriafan]

Which part?

the 2 sentences u wrote: 1) the ones banned did not get banned for crossing the line u previously mentioned. they got banned for basically disagreeing with kori and 2) fair or not i know the people u refer to as " weeds" and they are nothing but supporters of UTSA, no matter what they're called on this forum

[samikeyp]

the 2 sentences u wrote: 1) the ones banned did not get banned for crossing the line u previously mentioned. they got banned for basically disagreeing with kori and 2) fair or not i know the people u refer to as " weeds" and they are nothing but supporters of UTSA, no matter what they're called on this forum

They were being weeds for their behavior NOT for their support of UTSA Athletics. , I support UTSA Athletics and never even went to school there.

People got banned because they posted other people's personal info. That is wrong. They broke the rules and they paid for it.

Like it or not, this is Kori's site and she can ban anyone for anything at anytime. You may not think its fair but that is irrelevant. If not for Kori, there would be no College Football Forum. Just because a person doesn't like or agree with a rule doesn't give them permission to not follow said rule.

[tonylongoriafan]

I get it, I am just encouraging debate.

(I know you didn't mean me, lee)

ME TOO

[Dr. Gonzo]

the 2 sentences u wrote: 1) the ones banned did not get banned for crossing the line u previously mentioned. they got banned for basically disagreeing with kori and 2) fair or not i know the people u refer to as " weeds" and they are nothing but supporters of UTSA, no matter what they're called on this forum

So a person can't be a weed if they support UTSA?

Making threats against people, harassing people at work, calling people's supervisors, posing as a spokesman from the athletics department and throwing the athletics directors name around, which I'm sure she wouldn't be pleased about, and calling out the owner of the forum isn't weed behavior because they support UTSA? Got it.

[tonylongoriafan]

They were being weeds for their behavior NOT for their support of UTSA Athletics. , I support UTSA Athletics and never even went to school there.

People got banned because they posted other people's personal info. That is wrong. They broke the rules and they paid for it.

Like it or not, this is Kori's site and she can ban anyone for anything at anytime. You may not think its fair but that is irrelevant. If not for Kori, there would be no College Football Forum. Just because a person doesn't like or agree with a rule doesn't give them permission to not follow said rule.

i guess only kori can answer why people were banned. but the personal info, calling work, whatever happened thing was weeks ago. bleedo&b got banned cause he started a thread that yes called out kori but the jist of it was he disagreed with her. i guess that's kori's "right" fair not.

on another note, you can't build something like ST and claim ownership of it. no disrespect and not calling neone out, but kori maybe the creator, moderator, and owner of the domain name, but what makes ST great is that it belongs to the posters. NO ONE owns spurstalk.

[tonylongoriafan]

So a person can't be a weed if they support UTSA?

Making threats against people, harassing people at work, calling people's supervisors, posing as a spokesman from the athletics department and throwing the athletics directors name around, which I'm sure she wouldn't be pleased about, and calling out the owner of the forum isn't weed behavior because they support UTSA? Got it.

no, they can be. but didn't u basically invite them to do so. i know u did for me and i didn't take the bait. what i said was the I know them and they are not " weeds" just UTSA supporters.

[ATRAIN]

i guess only kori can answer why people were banned. but the personal info, calling work, whatever happened thing was weeks ago. bleedo&b got banned cause he started a thread that yes called out kori but the jist of it was he disagreed with her. i guess that's kori's "right" fair not.

on another note, you can't build something like ST and claim ownership of it. no disrespect and not calling neone out, but kori maybe the creator, moderator, and owner of the domain name, but what makes ST great is that it belongs to the posters. NO ONE owns spurstalk.

Actually she pays the bills and could shut it down anytime so she owns it.

[rolleyes]

on another note, you can't build something like ST and claim ownership of it. no disrespect and not calling neone out, but kori maybe the creator, moderator, and owner of the domain name, but what makes ST great is that it belongs to the posters. NO ONE owns spurstalk.

[tonylongoriafan]

Actually she pays the bills and could shut it down anytime so she owns it.

you can never shutdown ST






(insert rolling eyes here)

[CubanMustGo]

You're totally effing clueless.

No rolling eyes needed.

[ATRAIN]

you can never shutdown ST






(insert rolling eyes here)

You know I thought you were a quality poster but then you go and pull this out of your ass.....guess you fit right in with your UTSA buddies.