Would you two lovers go get a room and leave the rest of us to a thread in theory about college sports?
You don't know sh1t.
Talking out out of your ass again.
huh? You've been wrong in basically every post.So, did you have fun arguing over semantics because you didn't want a term applied to your post, then stringing a discussion out until you could find something to prove wrong about it?
You say you are being entertained in one post, then two posts later, you say this is boring you. Again, you don't know what "entertained" means.
You self own and are a focking clueless idiot.
Would you two lovers go get a room and leave the rest of us to a thread in theory about college sports?
This is turning out to be as epic as a Utsa thread!!!! Keep it going! I already went the off in here.........now I just want to sit back and
Are you handicapped? Do you need some kind of assistance in starting your own thread? Nothing's stopping you, Shooter.
friggin jeenyus after jeenyus keeps popping up.
Any idea when this UTSA football team will step foot onto a field?
This is awesome Blake. We've had a breakthrough! Blake has finally given in.
friggin jeenyus after jeenyus keeps popping up.
Let's get the UTSA threads going again we don't need the College Forum!
Fall of 2011.
That's just around the corner.
This is awesome Blake. We've had a breakthrough! Blake has finally given in.
Let's get the UTSA threads going again we don't need the College Forum!
weak
cmon........you had to know.....
Not really. This is basically exactly the same as everything else you've posted.
Uhhh... Apparently you have trouble separating portions and wholes. As a whole, this is entertaining me. You're repe ive insult is boring. I mean, my mom used to come up with better than that (then again, my mom was a pro, can't expect people to live up to her standards).
As for our little conversation here...
You defended yourself against the "derogatory at ude" claim by basically stating you do exactly what I meant. Wow.
Otherwise, the big part of the debate was over my supposition that the deal for Cowboys TC became more pro-SA after the Saints as part of JJ's plan to keep a team out of SA.
You did absolutely nothing to refute it. It's not like it's hard. Since my premise is based on the intentions of someone who isn't around to verify/refute them, all that was needed was to come up with a viable alternative explanation as to why the deal changed.
, a good tactic would have been to bring up the cost of moving equipment from Dallas to Cali vs Dallas to SA, and things like that. You could also have lessened the pro-Dallas image of the first agreement by reminding everyone that part of the financial incentive of the 2003 was to pay for new turf that the Alamodome still uses for all football events, and the sodding that was used in the temporary field was then used to replant youth parks.
, anybody worth their salt would have at least brought up the kicker in the current TC agreement allowing the city to kick the Cowboys out if SA gets a team.
Gee, look, I just did more damage to my own premise than you did the entire time. Instead of actually trying to address the premise, you instead attacked details surrounding the background information that are unimportant to the general premise.
It's actually a common tactic used by people who are more concerned about tearing others down below them than elevating themselves.
DAMN!!! LOL........................
........................
........................
how many points do i get for
which is what? You said you can call it word for word.
More ass talking again.
It's so boring, you can't help yourself in responding every time.Uhhh... Apparently you have trouble separating portions and wholes. As a whole, this is entertaining me. You're repe ive insult is boring.
self ownage again.
your mom was a pro? I'm not even sure how to respond to that.....I mean, my mom used to come up with better than that (then again, my mom was a pro, can't expect people to live up to her standards).
I guess I'm sorry.
self ownage again.
Wrong again.As for our little conversation here...
You defended yourself against the "derogatory at ude" claim by basically stating you do exactly what I meant. Wow.
I called you a focking clueless idiot based on your posts. Stating the truth through derogatory terms does not equal a derogatory at ude.
Derogatory at ude isn't even a psychological term of any kind. You made that up all by yourself because you are a focking clueless idiot.
It isn't hard. You're the one making the claim, dipsh1t. It's on you to provide the facts to back it up. You did nothing to verify it.Otherwise, the big part of the debate was over my supposition that the deal for Cowboys TC became more pro-SA after the Saints as part of JJ's plan to keep a team out of SA.
You did absolutely nothing to refute it.
It's not like it's hard. Since my premise is based on the intentions of someone who isn't around to verify/refute them, all that was needed was to come up with a viable alternative explanation as to why the deal changed.
How can I refute something when there's nothing out there to refute?
Of course, as you said, you are the one that likes to make up sh1t for fun.
If that isn't the case here, then you are a focking clueless idiot because of this.......not because I'm displayin your made-up term of "derogatory at ude" but because you really are a focking confused idiot.
Gee look, you are coming up with a bunch of assumptions that do absolutely nothing for anything., a good tactic would have been to bring up the cost of moving equipment from Dallas to Cali vs Dallas to SA, and things like that. You could also have lessened the pro-Dallas image of the first agreement by reminding everyone that part of the financial incentive of the 2003 was to pay for new turf that the Alamodome still uses for all football events, and the sodding that was used in the temporary field was then used to replant youth parks.
, anybody worth their salt would have at least brought up the kicker in the current TC agreement allowing the city to kick the Cowboys out if SA gets a team.
Gee, look, I just did more damage to my own premise than you did the entire time. Instead of actually trying to address the premise, you instead attacked details surrounding the background information that are unimportant to the general premise.
More ass talking again.
You are a focking clueless idiot because you cannot provide any facts or data to support any of your ass talking.
It's actually a common tactic used by people who are more concerned about tearing others down below them than elevating themselves.
A more common tactic that actually works is providing evidence to back up your stupid assessments.
You are focking clueless idiot.
Didn't say I could. I said I did for that one post. The gist of every single one of you posts has been the same, so it's not like that's a challenge.
Who would have thought that kind of response was coming from someone specializing in slinging insults. Wow. Real original there.
You understand the concept of stringing multiple words together? It's not like I claimed it was a psychological disorder or something. You can look up "derogatory" and "at ude" and figure out how they can interract, right?
Uhhh... I showed a distinct, radical change of action and speculated a reason and stimulus.
That's all I claimed to do. I didn't claim it as undisputable fact, and in fact at one point I specifically stated the "JJ doesn't want a team in SA" theories are conspiracy theories. I even made extra special mention of mine.
At that point, you either accept the admission, or come up with a viable opposing theory. You chose neither.
Yep, I sure do. It's wildly entertaining to argue things you have no belief in.
You do realize that every single thing I said in my points against my own argument is a complete varifiable fact, and pretty well known ones at that. Therefore, your last sentence would have made more sense further up. Of course, since you used this sentence, or derivation of it, so often, it really doesn't matter.
Well, considering you just called a bunch of facts assumptions, I'm not going to worry too much about it. Besides the fact that without testimony from the person who made the decision, the impetus for any decision is speculation.
And now you have officially bored me. Have a good weekend, see everybody on Monday.
Post # 466 and still no links or facts or data or anything but you talking out of your ass.
Obviously you're not getting bored of self ownage.
If you get tired of self-owning, let me know and I'll do it for you on Monday when you come back for more.
Looks like we have been called in just in time.
This would be the point where Mookie would post ''reggie bush lateral'' and lock this thread.
Whats up DEL???
ha........del.........
Last edited by redraiderinfiji; 02-20-2009 at 10:26 PM.
A&M v tech today!!!!!
UTSA got hammered saturday in huntsville (which sucks btw, a huge statue of sam houston and a prison)...the team looked like they just didn't want to be there...
I know it's a day late but damn that was a good win for Texas vs Oklahoma. I think they're going to have to win the Big 12 tourney to get to the "dance" though.
Was a close game.......Tech still is not that good.....Wish knight would have stayed!A&M v tech today!!!!!
I loved that big fat badass!
Best quote from knight....
"I want to be buried face down so my critics can kiss my ass"
- Indiana pep rally when Knight was leaving
why? who leaves in the middle of the season just so his son could get the job? what did he really do for ya'll when he was there? knight hasn't been relevant was 20 yrs
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
