Reply With Quote
So 9/11 was caused by an earthquake.
Mystery solved.
William Rodriguez Vindicated by Newly Released 9/11 Commission Notes
Submitted by Reprehensor on Sun, 02/22/2009 - 9:32am.
William Rodriguez
For several years now, self-styled "debunkers" have been claiming that William Rodriguez has been lying about the testimony he gave to the 9/11 Commission in 2004. For example, on Mark Roberts' website, Roberts mocks Rodriguez;
"January, 2009: As promised, many of the 9/11 Commission investigation records have been made public. There is a wealth of material online, with more to come. I'm sure William Rodriguez will want to get the copies of the notes made by two investigators who interviewed him, to prove his claim that his story hasn't changed from the start and that the Commission attempted to cover it up. (Don't hold your breath for Rodriguez to publish those notes.)"
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...berts-lies.jpg
Not only have Mr. Rodriguez's basic claims remained unchanged, the cover-up continues; his actual testimony remains "restricted". One can only imagine why that would be. The wiser JREFers who have been holding their collective breath may now exhale, as Mr. Rodriguez has supplied us with copies of the 9/11 Commission Investigator notes in PDF form, which read in part;
"Rodriguez said on September 11, 2001 he reported late to work which was unusual for him. He said he was in the B1 sublevel ABM office speaking to Anthony Saltamachia when the plane struck the North Tower (WTC 1). He immediately thought the explosion was caused by a generator. Shortly after the first explosion a second explosion rocked the building and caused the office's false ceiling to collapse. Following these explosions Felipe David, who was severely burned, ran into the office. Rodriguez said there was a third explosion and he believed then the explosions were caused by an earthquake."
Clearly, Rodriguez was indeed talking about "explosions" from the very start.
Download investigator notes here:
Typed notes.
Handwritten original.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19439
So 9/11 was caused by an earthquake.
Mystery solved.
Wow!! You're an intelligent debunker! From now on, we'll all call you Chumper Debunker.
I realize that people love a good conspiracy and looking under corners is good in the long run but assuming something is true becuase it hasn't been disproven yet is stupid.
All this time Chump and his head in the sand followers have been saying where is the proof of our crazy conspiracies and finally when something new pops up, they begin to mock that also?
That is further proof Chump is not about the truth but about taking the other side just for the sake of a good argument.
Let's see . . . a janitor with show business aspirations . . . or the entire respectable scientific community . . . hmmm
The fact is, all the witnesses in the subbasement, at least 4 others, all testified that the first explosion came from below them before the second explosion from above.
If you are a crime investigator or arson investigator, that is clearly strong enough evidence to prove in court that such a thing happened.
The reality, is that the 9/11 Commission was not looking for the truth. They already decided what the "truth" was before they started the investigation.
It should also be pointed out that eyewitness testimony is not a "theory" or a "conspiracy theory". The people who heard the explosions are direct witnesses, no theory needed.
Lets see....an alcoholic draft dodger (Bush)....or the entire UN...hmmm
Hold on to that feeling.
How many times must we go through this?
Explosions, and explosive sounds are not necessarily created by explosives!
We need to get out heads out of the sand, man.
Like we want to hear what a wannabe stalker has to say.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=117205
In your case remove it from your ass first then we can talk sand.
Why was there a powerful explosion in the sub-basement, below Rodriguez and others, before the plane impacted the WTC?
ohhh....I see what you did there....
that gonged worse than galfaileo
How zabout Chunker Debumper?
it's not something new that popped up.
It's the same old truther method of using someone saying "I heard an explosion" as being proof of detonation.
ohhh......I see what you did there too.....
gong
It is evidence of a detonation.
You use the old archie debunker trick, confusing proof with evidence.
In court? Not even close. Why do you think they haven't been in court?
Yet there is no proof of detonation wiring or explosives.The reality, is that the 9/11 Commission was not looking for the truth. They already decided what the "truth" was before they started the investigation.
It should also be pointed out that eyewitness testimony is not a "theory" or a "conspiracy theory". The people who heard the explosions are direct witnesses, no theory needed.
I've got a question for you.....are all of the WTC wired to detonate or just WTC 1, (2?) and 7?
and why WTC 7?
it is not strong evidence on it's own.
It would only be nice supporting evidence if comibined with something else such as an actual detonation device
Go to any 9/11 thread in the Political Forum of Spurs Talk. I'm saying it's proof that you're an idiot, but there's definitely evidence of it.
For the clinically brain dead, here's what a controlled demolition looks and sounds like.
what other noises do explosives make, besides explosions?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
