Reply With Quote
sheez.
What's the big deal if people heard explosions?
What they didn't hear, was explosives used by demolitionists.
sheez.
Truth is Willie didn't know what he was hearing when he heard it - that's precisely what his testimony shows - so there is no way to confirm what each noise actually was.
It simply makes no logical sense to set off incendiary devices in the basement that no one can see and cause the exact same damage as vaporized jet fuel at the exact same time your alleged partners in crime slam an airplane filled with actual jet fuel into the same building 80 floors above.
Give me a narrative that makes sense -- tell me what you think really happened on 9/11.
Nice try!
What's your proof? What did cause those explosions?
so when Willie and the others first heard the explosion below them, they were supposed to immediately determine that a demolition had gone off?
Are you aware that eyewitnesses are just supposed to tell what they heard, saw, or felt in regards to evidence?
They are supposed to know now?
Yes, that's why Willie's saying that 9/11 is an inside job is ridiculous. He heard explosions and didn't know what they were. That's all.Are you aware that eyewitnesses are just supposed to tell what they heard, saw, or felt in regards to evidence?
you're the one accusing someone of demolition. What is your proof?
oh yeah.........earwitnesses.
attorney: "so let me get this straight, you heard a duck quack"
witness: "yes"
attorney: "good enough......no further questions Your Honor"
Jury: "we find there to be sufficient evidence of a duck, your honor, and rule in favor of duck conspiracists."
so eyewitness reports of explosions automatically equals controlled deomlition in your book?
Are you mental?
Why would an explosion go off in the basement, just before the plane hit? Why would this info be covered up? That is guilty demeanor, a well established legal principle.
are you a lawyer? How do you know that the demolition was illegal? Maybe a terrorist was hiding down there with a bomb, and it went off when a good samaritan tried to stop it.
He knows now why they were there. Back in 2004, he didn't know. He speculated that maybe bin Laden put the bombs down there.
How could it be proven that someone in the sub-basement could hear the impact explosion 80 floors up?
How does he know now? What changed? You are saying he can only go by what he witnessed. In that case, he still doesn't know.No, he filed a lawsuit against the Bush administration claiming they did it.He speculated that maybe bin Laden put the bombs down there.
The explosion made part of the roof collapse. You are talking in circles.
What roof? The fake roof of the office? An explosion caused that. There is no way to prove it was the plane impact explosion.No. You just don't understand logical thought.You are talking in circles.
Why would there be any explosions at all in the sub-basements, if the plane hit on the 95th floor.
There are dozens of witnesses who heard these explosions, and many who were injured by them (physical evidence).
Well I saw in the tle "William Rodriguez Vindicated by Newly Released 9/11 Commission Notes.
How can you compare a regular demolition to one that is trying to be concealed, are you really that naive or are you just acting this way for our enjoyment?
For someone who claims to be Galileo, you sure don't know much about gravity.There is no doubt that explosions occurred, you just missed the most obvious cause of the explosions because you are completely biased towards arguing for a controlled demolition that took place over an hour after the explosions that you say caused the demolition.There are dozens of witnesses who heard these explosions, and many who were injured by them (physical evidence).
If Chump had some what of an open mind like RandomLie he would be worth the effort of a serious debate. But you could have 1 million eyewitnesses with video tapes of the basement exploding and he will say that is not enough proof.
But then again you guys have to deal with him 24/7 so I am not telling you anything you don't already know.
How was it concealed?
Who planted these phantom charges?
How did they get the charges to act exactly like jet fuel and burning debris falling down elevator and service shafts at the exact same time jet fuel and burning debris was falling down elevator and service shafts?
Why go through the trouble of planting phantom charges that act exactly like jet fuel and burning debris falling down elevator and service shafts and detonate them at the exact same time jet fuel and burning debris was falling down elevator and service shafts?
Please be specific.
Maybe if you actually had the balls to post what you think really happened on 9/11 using one screen name, people might respect you more.
When Chump can explain why sulfur residue was found on the WTC steel beams then i might chime in on this one sided debate.
What name do you recommend? Pardon me does your birth certificate say ChumpDumper? Don't lecture others on screen names that's just another spin you use to avoid the truth. I don't need respect I only seek the truth, only those who live a lie have the burden or need to seek respect from others so they may legitimize there existence on earth.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
