Page 6 of 20 FirstFirst ... 234567891016 ... LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 495
  1. #126
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    The 9/11 attacks were also set up, as to not harm any historical sites.

  2. #127
    Moss is Da Sauce! mouse's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    26,358
    How much pot does your average twoofer smoke?

    By the posts in this thead, I'd say quite a bit.
    So people who smoke pot can never amount to anything?




    Funny your avatar is one of the biggest weed smokers around.

  3. #128
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    It just doesn't make any sense. But then again, all of this is so far fetched it makes the OJ frame job seem plausible by comparison.
    OJ's easy to explain: The cops tried to frame a guilty guy and contaminated all the evidence. The two sides of the argument are not mutually exclusive, but that's not the only difference. Neither side of the OJ argument is completely insane.

  4. #129
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    9/11 is also well do ented.
    Quite right -- and there is no evidence of planted explosives or controlled demolition whatsoever.

  5. #130
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    The 9/11 attacks were also set up, as to not harm any historical sites.
    Then they ed up, because the Pentagon got hit.

  6. #131
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    I know these "black ops" guys are super smart and everything, but, if I were to stage a fake terrorist attack, why would I bother with hijacked planes?


    Wasn't the WTC actually BOMBED in 1993? Why not just plant bombs all over the place in towers 1 and 2? And why bother with rinky-dink WTC7 when you've just destroyed WTC1 and 2?


    Why weren't other small buildings in the area also "pulled"?


    It just doesn't make any sense. But then again, all of this is so far fetched it makes the OJ frame job seem plausible by comparison.
    The 9/11 attacks were set up to mimick a feature length thriller film.

    Each significant event was spaced out by about 15 to 20 minutes, the length of time between TV commercials and to permit bathroom breaks.

    This gripping thriller lasted about as long a typical motion picture, building suspense:

    1st tower hit

    2nd tower hit

    Pentagon hit

    2nd tower comes down

    1st tower comes down.

    WTC 7 was also supposed to be hit, too, to fill the gap after the between the South tower and the Pentagon.

    WTC 7 was supposed to come down after the North tower came down.

    Due to FL93 getting stuck in the runway for 43 minutes, this part had to be scrapped and they shot it down.

    They blew up WTC 7 just before dusk, so you could not see the charges very well.

    All the world's a stage.

  7. #132
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Wouldn't someone find at least one piece of steel from WTC 7 eventually?
    They did.

    No. The federal Post office was next door, they did not want to damage it.
    Why not?

    That's the priorities of an evil person. I find it hard to understand, too.
    You made the claim, now back it up.

    The 9/11 attacks were also set up, as to not harm any historical sites.
    The Pentagon is a pretty historical site. You could say it was also set up not to harm you personally, so therefore you are behind the 9/11 plot.

  8. #133
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    The 9/11 attacks were set up to mimick a feature length thriller film.

    Each significant event was spaced out by about 15 to 20 minutes, the length of time between TV commercials and to permit bathroom breaks.

    STOP. STOP. MY RIBS.


    If it was supposed to mimic a "thriller", then WTC7 was quite the dud.

  9. #134
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    The 9/11 attacks were set up to mimick a feature length thriller film.

    Each significant event was spaced out by about 15 to 20 minutes, the length of time between TV commercials and to permit bathroom breaks.

    This gripping thriller lasted about as long a typical motion picture, building suspense:

    1st tower hit

    2nd tower hit

    Pentagon hit

    2nd tower comes down

    1st tower comes down.

    WTC 7 was also supposed to be hit, too, to fill the gap after the between the South tower and the Pentagon.

    WTC 7 was supposed to come down after the North tower came down.

    Due to FL93 getting stuck in the runway for 43 minutes, this part had to be scrapped and they shot it down.

    They blew up WTC 7 just before dusk, so you could not see the charges very well.

    All the world's a stage.
    Who is they and why would they do this?

    Why would they do anything to WTC7?

    No one knew anything about that building before 9/11.

  10. #135
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    OJ's easy to explain: The cops tried to frame a guilty guy and contaminated all the evidence. The two sides of the argument are not mutually exclusive, but that's not the only difference. Neither side of the OJ argument is completely insane.
    OJ Simpson was innocent as the jury determined. You are a conspiracy theorist. The real killer was Jason Simpson.

  11. #136
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    10:05 a.m. WTC south tower collapses
    10:28 a.m. WTC north tower collapses


    <7 hours later>

    5:20 p.m. Insignificant WTC7 collapses


    Doesn't this go against your theory of "thriller" movie, Galileo?

  12. #137
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    The magic jet fuel.

    Creates a giant fireball outside.

    Starts a massive fire at the top.

    Goes 1000 feet down to start explosions in the basement.

    Takes down WTC 7.
    Jet fuel didn't take down WTC 7. Debris from the north tower that caught on fire did.

  13. #138
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    10:05 a.m. WTC south tower collapses
    10:28 a.m. WTC north tower collapses


    <7 hours later>

    5:20 p.m. Insignificant WTC7 collapses


    Doesn't this go against your theory of "thriller" movie, Galileo?
    Yeah, that's more like Berlin Alexanderplatz.

  14. #139
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    OJ's easy to explain: The cops tried to frame a guilty guy and contaminated all the evidence. The two sides of the argument are not mutually exclusive, but that's not the only difference. Neither side of the OJ argument is completely insane.
    OJ didn't do it. He had no motive, as the jury told the press in post-trial interviews. Just because someone got into a squabble with their ex-wife 6 years ago is not a real motive. OJ had plenty of women.

    The timeline didn't make rational sense, ruling out OJ as the killer. During the first two days of the trial, F. Lee Baily destroyed the testimony of Tom Lange and van Atter, showing the government theory to be false.

    Ron Goldman was a drug snitch in the witness protection program, and was a big time drug dealer. Jason Simpson was a small time dealer and Nicole was a coke . Jason went to kill Goldman and Nicole got caught in the crossfire.

    That's why they never found the murder weapon, Jason got it from the kitchen where he worked, and was never questioned by police.

    On the day after the murders, OJ hired a lawyer for Jason, but not for himself.

    If OJ did it, he would have had blood all over him.

    www.theoverlookedsuspect.com

    Do not question the jury verdict until you have examined all the evidence that the jury has already analyzed.

  15. #140
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    Jet fuel didn't take down WTC 7. Debris from the north tower that caught on fire did.
    why would WTC 7 catch on fire without jet fuel?

  16. #141
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    That's the priorities of an evil person. I find it hard to understand, too.
    so throwing out crap and hoping some of it sticks must be the priority of a Galileo. I find him hard to understand, too.

  17. #142
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    why would WTC 7 catch on fire without jet fuel?
    A burning building fell on it.

  18. #143
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    1,636
    The 9/11 attacks were set up to mimick a feature length thriller film.

    Each significant event was spaced out by about 15 to 20 minutes, the length of time between TV commercials and to permit bathroom breaks.

    This gripping thriller lasted about as long a typical motion picture, building suspense:

    1st tower hit

    2nd tower hit

    Pentagon hit

    2nd tower comes down

    1st tower comes down.

    WTC 7 was also supposed to be hit, too, to fill the gap after the between the South tower and the Pentagon.

    WTC 7 was supposed to come down after the North tower came down.

    Due to FL93 getting stuck in the runway for 43 minutes, this part had to be scrapped and they shot it down.

    They blew up WTC 7 just before dusk, so you could not see the charges very well.

    All the world's a stage.
    Flight 93 was going to DC, not New York. Do you really think WTC 7 was a more important--more "thrilling"---target than the Capitol or the White House? I want to know. Please answer.

    By the way, I love your use of the passive voice and the sinister "they."

  19. #144
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    Then they ed up, because the Pentagon got hit.
    They caused no damage that threatened the historical value of the Pentagon. They hit a part that was already under renovation and had reinforced walls to further reduce the damage.

    The Pentagon isn't very old either. It takes 100 years to make an antique.

  20. #145
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    The 9/11 attacks were also set up, as to not harm any historical sites.
    Who set them up?

  21. #146
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    They caused no damage that threatened the historical value of the Pentagon. They hit a part that was already under renovation and had reinforced walls to further reduce the damage.

    The Pentagon isn't very old either. It takes 100 years to make an antique.
    The historical landmark St. Nicholas Church was 169 years old when it was destroyed by the collapse of the south tower on 9/11.



    Another theory fails.

  22. #147
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    A burning building fell on it.
    You really believe that, don't you? So it wasn't the thermal expansion?

  23. #148
    Student of Liberty Galileo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,967
    The historical landmark St. Nicholas Church was 169 years old when it was destroyed by the collapse of the south tower on 9/11.



    Another theory fails.
    Most people have never heard of that. I'm talking about well-known landmarks like the Statue of Liberty, the Empire State Building, the Washington Monument, or the Whitehouse.

    People would get vwery upset if those national reasure were damaged, not some old church.

  24. #149
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    OJ didn't do it. He had no motive, as the jury told the press in post-trial interviews. Just because someone got into a squabble with their ex-wife 6 years ago is not a real motive. OJ had plenty of women.

    The timeline didn't make rational sense, ruling out OJ as the killer. During the first two days of the trial, F. Lee Baily destroyed the testimony of Tom Lange and van Atter, showing the government theory to be false.

    Ron Goldman was a drug snitch in the witness protection program, and was a big time drug dealer. Jason Simpson was a small time dealer and Nicole was a coke . Jason went to kill Goldman and Nicole got caught in the crossfire.

    That's why they never found the murder weapon, Jason got it from the kitchen where he worked, and was never questioned by police.

    On the day after the murders, OJ hired a lawyer for Jason, but not for himself.

    If OJ did it, he would have had blood all over him.

    www.theoverlookedsuspect.com

    Do not question the jury verdict until you have examined all the evidence that the jury has already analyzed.
    right. which is exactly why OJ went on the bizarre ride in the Bronco.

    Please save this for another thread and say who was behind the controlled demolition.

  25. #150
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    You really believe that, don't you?
    There is extensive video and eyewitness testimony to confirm this. Please explain how a burning building did not fall on WTC7.
    So it wasn't the thermal expansion?
    The thermal expansion was caused by the fires which were caused by the burning building that fell on WTC7.

    What part is difficult for you to comprehend?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •