You have to be on pace to play 70 games to qualify. Since Parker missed ten games, he needs to get to 56 of 66 to reach that ratio - so 11 more games.
even nba.com doesn't think it's important.
Since the begining of the season they haven't put him in the stats.
http://www.nba.com/statistics/player...xp=-1&splitDD=
You have to be on pace to play 70 games to qualify. Since Parker missed ten games, he needs to get to 56 of 66 to reach that ratio - so 11 more games.
oh ok i didn't know that, thanks
failed attempt...
try again
Xap'
well it wasn't a trade to bash tony, he's my favourite spurs (je suis français)
Then I am sorry ! ( désolé le man !// le re portait à confusion )
Xap'
You mean UNDERrated!!
Tony's good, but in clutch situations I'd take Manu.
Who would you all want with the ball in a Game 7 with the score tied, under 24 seconds to go, Tony or Manu?
This season..... I want Tony to handle the ball and Mason to take the final shot.
When you go to the stats page on nba.com, look on the top of the page at section #4: Filter Options. Underneath that is a line that says Qualified: All / Qualified. If you click on All, the stat page will list all nba players in that statistical category, not just the guys with enough games to qualify.
I had sportscenter ESPN on last night around 11 or 12 and all they talked about were Kobe, James, Wade, Dirk, and one other scrub.
Nothing..........NOTHING....on Parker who had the best performance of the day.
ESPN ! You should see the games broadcasted by ESPN Brazil it's a lot of fun, the two guys are beyond pathetic, they know about bb, the other day they were talking about the best PGs it was like CP3 then Rondo then Nash then KiddDW and TP not mentionned.
That's true
They're awful
But Tony is listed as 'Qualified' for assists. I wonder why it is different.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)